Since the founding of Harvard College, colleges and universities have used many types of examinations to serve multiple purposes. In the early days of student assessment, the process was straightforward. Each institution developed and administered its own unique examination to its own students to monitor their progress and to prospective students who applied for admission. Large-scale standardized tests emerged in the twentieth century in part to relieve the burden placed upon high schools of having to prepare students to meet the examination requirements of each institution to which a student applied. Up to that point, local communities of tutors and teachers were attempting to prepare students to succeed on each higher education institution’s unique examination. Large-scale standardized tests have enjoyed more than a century of popularity and growth, and they have helped higher education institutions to solve problems in admissions and placement, and to measure learning outcomes. Over time, they have also become controversial, especially pertaining to race and class. This article is a historical view of educational testing in U.S. higher education, linking its development with past and present societal challenges related to civil rights laws, prominent higher education policies, and the long struggle of African American people in the United States.
AtkinsonRichard C.2004. College admissions and the SAT: A personal perspective. Address at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, San Diego, CA, April14.
2.
BarkenSteven E.2010. A brief history of education in the United States. In Sociology: Understanding and changing the social world, 596–98. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Libraries.
3.
BaumSandy. 1995. The federal role in financing higher education: An economic perspective. Paper presented at the National Conference on the Best Ways for the Federal Government to Help Students and Families Finance Postsecondary Education, Charleston, SC, October.
BondLloyd. 1981. Bias in mental tests. In Issues in testing: Coaching, disclosure, and ethnic bias, ed. GreenBert F.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Boss.
6.
BowenWilliamBokDerek. 1998. The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
BowenWilliam G.ChingosMatthew M.McPhersonMichael S.2018. Test scores and high school grades as predictors. In Measuring success: Testing, grades, and the future of college admissions, eds. BuckleyJackLetukasLynnWildavskyBen, 193–226. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
BrighamCarl C.1923. A study of American intelligence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
ChalmersDavid M.2003. Backfire: How the Ku Klux Klan helped the civil rights movement. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
11.
Civil Rights Act of1964, Pub. L. 88–352, 78 Stat. 241 (1964).
12.
ClearyT. Anne. 1968. Test bias: Prediction of grades of Negro and white students in integrated colleges. Journal of Educational Measurement5 (2): 115–24.
13.
ColeNancy S.1973. Bias in selection. Journal of Educational Measurement10 (4): 237–55.
14.
ColeNancy S.ZiekyMichael J.2001. The new faces of fairness. Journal of Educational Measurement38 (4): 369–82.
15.
The College Board. 2016. Innovative practices of interest on campus. Washington, DC:
Educational Testing Service (ETS). 2018. Navigating holistic admissions for a stronger graduate program. Princeton, NJ: ETS. Available from http://www.holisticadmissions.org/.
EliotCharles W.1904. The Negro problem. Records of the President of Harvard University, box 219, folder 144, Harvard University Archives.
24.
EliotCharles W.1969. A turning point in higher education. The inaugural address of Charles William Eliot as president of Harvard College. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
FordDonna Y.2004. Intelligence testing and cultural diversity: Concerns, cautions, and considerations. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
26.
FuessClaude M.1950. The College Board: Its first fifty years. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
27.
GladieuxLawrence. 1995. Federal student aid policy: A history and an assessment. Paper presented at the National Conference on the Best Ways for the Federal Government to Help Students and Families Finance Postsecondary Education, Charleston, SC, October.
28.
HarperShaun R.PattonLori D.WoodenOntario S.2009. Access and equity for African American students in higher education: A critical race historical analysis of policy efforts. Journal of Higher Education80 (4): 389–414.
Harvard University. ca. 1806–1994. Harvard University. Faculty of arts, sciences and Harvard College. Faculty minutes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Archives.
HeflingKimberly. 14November2018. College Board chief: There are a lot of amazing people with low SAT scores. Politico.
34.
HerboldHilary. 1994. Never a level playing field: Blacks and the GI Bill. Journal of Blacks in Higher Education1(6): 104–8.
35.
HickmanBrent R.2010. Effort, race gaps and affirmative action: A game-theoretic analysis of college admissions. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.
36.
Higher Education Act of1965, Pub. L. 89–329 (1965).
37.
HilliardAsa G.2000. Excellence in education versus high-stakes standardized testing. Journal of Teacher Education51 (4): 293–304.
38.
HoffmanCharleneSnyderThomas D.DavisCelestineSonnenbergBill. 1996. Historically Black colleges and universities, 1976 to 1994. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
39.
HolmgrenDavid. 2008. Lindquist, Everet Franklin. In The biographical dictionary of Iowa, eds. HudsonDavidBergmanMarvinHortonLoren. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.
40.
JaschikScott. 27September2017. New SAT, old gaps on race. Inside Higher Ed. Available from https://www.insidehighered.com.
41.
JencksChristopherPhillipsMeredith. 1998. The Black-white test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
42.
JensenArthur. 1969. How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement?Harvard Educational Review39 (1): 1–123.
43.
KarabelJerome. 2006. The chosen: The hidden history of admission and exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
44.
KatznelsonIra. 2006. When affirmative action was white: An untold history of racial inequality in twentieth-century America. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.
45.
KillenbeckMark R.2004. Affirmative action and diversity: The beginning of the end? Or the end of the beginning?Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
KozolJonathan. 1967. Death at an early age: The destruction of the hearts and minds of Negro children in the Boston public schools. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
LaPianaWilliam P.1998. A history of the Law School Admission Council and the LSAT. Paper presented at the LSAC Annual Meeting.
50.
LawrenceIda M.RigolGretchen W.Van EssenThomasJacksonCarol A.2003. A historical perspective on the content of the SAT. New York, NY: The College Board.
51.
LemannNicholas. 2000. The big test: the secret history of the American meritocracy. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
52.
LinnRobert L.1973. Fair test use in selection. Review of Educational Research43 (2): 139–61.
53.
LinnRobert. 2001. A century of standardized testing: Controversies and pendulum swings. Educational Assessment7 (1): 29–38.
54.
LivingstonGary D.1993. Racism and the passage of the Immigration Act of 1924: The beginning of the quota system. Journal of Borderlands Studies8 (2): 73–90.
55.
LucidoJerome A.2018. Understanding the test-optional movement. In Measuring success: Testing, grades, and the future of college admissions, eds. BuckleyJackLetukasLynnWildavskyBen, 145–70. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
56.
MaguireEric. 2018. Going test-optional: A case study. In Measuring success: Testing, grades, and the future of college admissions, eds. BuckleyJackLetukasLynnWildavskyBen, 171–92. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
McGaghieWilliam C.2002. Assessing readiness for medical education: Evolution of the Medical College Admission Test. JAMA288 (9): 1085–90.
60.
McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950).
61.
MillerSherralWalkerMichaelLetukasLynn. 2017. Redesigning the SAT using principles of fairness and equity. In Test fairness in the new generation of large-scale assessment, eds. JiaoHongLissitzRobert W.Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
62.
Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada, 305 U.S. 337 (1938).
NettlesMichael T.1995. How much can education do?Planning for Higher Education23 (3): 10–18.
66.
NettlesMichael T.GossmanErica J.ThoenyA. RobertDandridgeBetty A.1988. The causes and consequences of college students’ performance: a focus on Black and white students’ attrition rates, progression rates and grade point averages. Nashville, TN: Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
67.
NettlesMichael T.MillettCatherine M.ReadyDouglas D.2003. Attacking the African American–white achievement gap on college admissions tests. Brookings Papers on Education Policy6:215–52.
68.
NettlesMichael T.PernaLaura W.MillettCatherine M.1998. Race and testing in college admissions. In Chilling admissions: The affirmative action crisis and the search for alternatives, eds. OrfieldGaryMillerEdward, 97–110. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
69.
OlsonKeith W.1974. The G.I. Bill, the veterans, and the colleges. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
70.
PetersenNancy S.NovickMelvin R.1976. An evaluation of some models for culture-fair selection. Journal of Educational Measurement13 (1): 3–29.
71.
PopescuIoanaDuffyErinMendelsohnJoshuaEscarceJosé J.2018. Racial residential segregation, socioeconomic disparities, and the white-Black survival gap. PLOS ONE13 (2): e0193222. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193222.
72.
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896).
73.
Roberts v. City of Boston, 59 D. Mass. 198 (1850).
74.
RikoonSamuelLiebtagTravisOlivera-AguilarMargaritaRobbinsStevenJacksonTeresa. 2014. A pilot study of holistic assessment and course placement in community college: Findings and recommendations. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Available from https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RM-14-10.pdf.
75.
SantelicesMaria VeronicaWilsonMark. 2010. Unfair treatment? The case of Freedle, the SAT, and the standardization approach to differential item functioning. Harvard Educational Review80 (1): 106–34.
76.
SeldenSteven. 1999. Inheriting shame: The story of eugenics and racism in America. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Sipuel v. Board of Regents of Univ. of Okla., 332 U.S. 631 (1948).
79.
SmallwoodMary Lovett. 1935. An historical study of examinations and grading systems in early American universities: A critical study of the original records of Harvard, William and Mary, Yale, Mount Holyoke, and Michigan from their founding to 1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80.
SnyderThomas D.HoffmanCharlene M.1993. Digest of education statistics 1993. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
81.
SteeleClaude MAronsonJoshua. 1995. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology69 (5): 797–811.
82.
StewartJeffrey C.2018. The new Negro: The life of Alain Locke. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
83.
StewartSaranHaynesChayla. 2015. An alternative approach to standardized testing: A model that promotes racial equity and college access. Journal of Critical Scholarship on Higher Education and Student Affairs2 (1): 122–36.
84.
Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950).
85.
ThorndikeRobert L.1971. Concepts of culture-fairness. Journal of Educational Measurement8 (2): 63–70.
86.
TrowMartin. 1988. American higher education: Past, present, and future. Educational Researcher17 (3): 13–23.
87.
TurnerSarahBoundJohn. 2003. Closing the gap or widening the divide: The effects of the G.I. Bill and World War II on the educational outcomes of Black Americans. Journal of Economic History63 (1): 145–77.
88.
U.S. Congress, House of Representatives. 1924. Restriction of immigration: Hearings before the Committee on Immigration and Naturalization, House of Representatives, 68th Congress, 1st Session. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
89.
ValentineJohn A.1987. The College Board and the school curriculum: A history of the College Board’s influence on the substance and standards of American education, 1900–1980. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
90.
VersheldenCia. 2017. Bandwidth recovery: Helping students reclaim cognitive resources lost to poverty, racism and social marginalization. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
91.
WechslerHarold S.2017. The qualified student: A history of selective college admission in America. New York, NY: Routledge.
92.
WigginsGrant. 2011. A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan92 (7): 81–93.
93.
WilkinsRoy. 1948. University of Arkansas is first. The Crisis77 (9): 330–33.
94.
ZookGeorge Frederick. 1947. Higher education for American democracy. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
95.
ZwickRebecca. 2002. Fair game?New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
