The effects of recessions on social and political attitudes are likely smaller than the effects on employment, income, and wealth, but relatively modest aggregate effects may be masking differences in attitudes between individuals who live in areas most and least affected by recessions. To investigate social and political attitudes in geographical context, we exploit a new data source that matches individuals to their county of residence to analyze whether changing economic conditions at the county level are associated with changing confidence in major social institutions and with changing levels of interpersonal trust. We find that individuals in particularly affected counties are more likely to decrease their support for organized labor and the federal government. County-level hardship does not appear to be associated with changes in interpersonal measures of trust, however, suggesting that two very different processes may be at play.
AndersonCameron D.RoyJason. 2011. Local economies and national economic evaluations. Electoral Studies30:795–803.
2.
BarrAndrewTurnerSarah E.2013. Expanding enrollments and contracting state budgets: The effects of the Great Recession on higher education. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, this volume.
3.
BartelsLarry M.2013. Political effects of the Great Recession. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, this volume.
4.
BlinderAlan S.2013. The macroeconomic policy paradox: Failing by succeeding. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, this volume.
5.
CookKaren S.LeviMargaretHardinRussell, eds. 2009. Whom can we trust? How groups, networks and institutions make trust possible. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
6.
GlanvilleJenniferPaxtonPamela. 2007. How do we learn to trust? A confirmatory tetrad analysis of the sources of generalized trust. Social Psychology Quarterly70:230–42.
7.
GruskyDavidWesternBruceWimerChristopher, eds. 2011. The Great Recession. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
8.
HoogheMarcReeskensTimStolleDietlindTrappersAnn. 2009. Ethnic diversity and generalized trust in Europe: A cross-national multilevel study. Comparative Political Studies42 (2): 198–223.
9.
HoutMichaelLevanonAsafCumberworthErin. 2011. Unemployment during recessions. In The Great Recession, eds. GruskyDavidWesternBruceWimerChristopher, 59–81. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
10.
KenworthyLaneOwensLindsay A.2011. How do economic recessions influence public opinion. In The Great Recession, eds. GruskyDavidWesternBruceWimerChristopher, 196–219. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
11.
KinderDonald R.KiewietD. Roderick. 1979. Economic discontent and political behavior: The role of personal grievances and collective economic judgments in congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science23:495–527.
12.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.StegmaierMary. 2000. Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science3:183–219.
13.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.StegmaierMary. 2008. Economic models of voting. In The Oxford handbook of political behavior, eds. DaltonRussell J.KlingemannHans-Dieter, 518–37. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14.
LimChaeyoonLaurenceJames. n.d. Doing good when times are bad: Volunteering behavior in economic hard times. Unpublished manuscript.
15.
MunnellAlicia H.RutledgeMatthew S.2013. The effects of the Great Recession on the retirement security of older workers. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, this volume.
16.
OwensLindsay A.2012. The Polls—Trends: Confidence in banks, financial institutions and Wall Street, 1971–2011. Public Opinion Quarterly76 (1): 142–62.
17.
PaxtonPamela. 2005. Trust in decline?Contexts4:40–46.
18.
PfefferFabian T.DanzigerSheldonSchoeniRobert F.2013. Wealth disparities before and after the Great Recession. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, this volume.
19.
PutnamRobert D.2007. E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies30 (2): 137–74.
20.
ReevesAndrewGimpelJames G.2012. Ecologies of unease: Geographic context and national economic evaluations. Political Behavior34:507–34.
21.
RothsteinBoStolleDietlind. 2001. Social capital and street-level bureaucracy: An institutional theory of generalized trust. Paper presented at the Trust in Government Conference, Center for the Study of Democratic Politics, Princeton, NJ.
22.
SampsonRobert J.GraifCorina. 2009. Structural and temporal contexts of trust: Durable social processes in Chicago neighborhoods. In Whom do we trust? How groups, networks and institutions make trust possible, eds. CookKaren S.LeviMargaretHardinRussell, 182–216. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
23.
SmithSandra. 2010. Race and trust. Annual Review of Sociology36:453–75.
24.
SmithTomSonJaesok. 2010. An analysis of panel attrition and panel change on the 2006–2008 General Social Survey panel. GSS Methodological Report No. 118. Chicago, IL: NORC.
25.
StevensonWendyWolfersJustin. 2011. Trust in public institutions over the business cycle. American Economic Review101 (3): 281–87.
van der MeerTomJochemTolsma. 2011. Ethnic diversity and its supposed detrimental effects on social cohesion: A review of 56 empirical studies. Working Paper, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
28.
WolffEdwardOwensLindsay A.BurakEsra. 2011. Housing and wealth in the Great Recession. In The Great Recession, eds. GruskyDavidWesternBruceWimerChristopher, 127–58. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
29.
Zizumbo-ColungaDanielZechmeisterElizabeth J.SeligsonMitchell A.2010. Social capital and economic crisis in the United States. AmericasBarometer Insights No. 43. Available from http://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/insights/I0843en.pdf.
