Abstract
Corporate self-regulation has been blamed for many of the worst environmental and financial catastrophes of the twenty-first century, but the failure of self-regulation in these catastrophes has been rivaled by failures of government regulation. This article explores the consequences of adopting self-regulation under conditions of failed or deficient government regulation. First, it identifies the conditions that produce the phenomenon of “blue moon” self-regulation, or self-regulation that successfully achieves public regulatory goals. Second, it develops a typology of regulatory voids in which self-regulation is commonly adopted and analyzes its prospects for success under each set of conditions. It concludes that prospects for self-regulatory success are particularly bleak in regulatory voids that have been created by the concerted political opposition of regulated entities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
