The quintessential image of the television audience is of the family viewing at home—sitting together comfortably in front of the lively set. Accompanying this happy image is its negative—a child viewing alone while real life goes on elsewhere. This article reviews evidence over five decades regarding the changing place of television in children’s lives. It argues that, notwithstanding postwar trends that have significantly changed adolescence, the family home, and wider consumer society, there was time for the 1950s family experiment to spawn the 1960s and 1970s family television experiment, thereby shaping normative expectations—academic, policy, and popular—regarding television audiences for years to come. At the turn of the twenty-first century, we must recognize that it was the underlying long-term trend of individualization, and its associated trends of consumerism, globalization, and democratization, that, historically and now, more profoundly frame the place of television in the family.
Abrams, M.1959. The teenage consumer. In LPE (London Express Exchange) papers. Vol. 5. London: The London Press Exchange Ltd.
2.
Andreasen, M.S.1994. Patterns of family life and television consumption from 1945 to the 1990’s. In Media, children and the family-Social scientific, psychodynamic and clinical perspectives, ed. J. Bryant and A. C. Huston , 19-35. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Barker, M., and J. Petley.2001. Ill effects: The media/violence debate . 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
4.
Beck, U. [ 1986]2005. Risk society: Towards a new modernity . London: Sage.
5.
Beck, U., and E. Beck-Gernsheim .2002. Individualization. London: Sage.
6.
Bettelheim, B.1999. Do children need television? In Children, television and the new media, ed. P. Lohr and M. Meyer, 3-7. Luton , UK: University of Luton Press.
7.
Broddason, T.2006. Youth and new media in the new millennium. Nordicom Review27 (2): 105-18.
8.
Butsch, R.2000. The making of American audiences: From stage to television 1750-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Coontz, S.1997. The way we really are: Coming to terms with America’s changing families. New York: Basic Books.
10.
Cunningham, H.1995. The century of the child. In Children and childhood in Western society since 1500, ed. H. Cunningham, 163-85. London and New York : Longman.
11.
Europa.2007. Media literacy: Do people really understand how to make the most of blogs, search engines or interactive TV?http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/07/1970&format=HTML&aged=l&language=EN&guiLanguage=en (accessed July 19, 2008).
12.
Flichy, P.2002. New media history. In Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs, ed. L. Lievrouw and S. Livingstone, 136-50. London : Sage.
13.
France, A.2007. Understanding youth in late modernity. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
14.
Gadlin, H.1978. Child discipline and the pursuit of self: An historical interpretation. In Advances in child development and behavior, vol. 12, ed. H. W. Reese and L. P. Lipsitt, 231-61. New York: Academic Press.
15.
Giddens, A.1991. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge, UK: Polity .
16.
---. 1993. The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
17.
Goodman, I.R.1983. Television’s role in family interaction: A family systems perspective. Journal of Family Issues4 (2): 405-24.
18.
Hill, M., and K. Tisdall.1997. Children and society. London: Longman.
19.
Hillman, M., Whitelegg, J., & Adams, J., 1990. One false move . . . A study of children’s independent mobility. London: Policy Studies Institute.
20.
Himmelweit, H.T., A.N. Oppenheim, and P. Vince.1958. Television and the child. An empirical study of the effect of television on the young. London : Oxford University Press.
21.
Jenkins, H.2003. Quentin Tarantino’s Star Wars? Digital cinema, media convergence, and participatory culture. In Rethinking media change: The aesthetics of transition, ed. D. Thorburn and H. Jenkins, 281-312. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
Johnsson-Smaragdi, U.1992. Learning to watch television: Longitudinal LISREL models replicated. Lund Research Papers in Media and Communication Studies no. 5 . Lund, Sweden: University of Lund .
23.
Katz, E.2003. Disintermediating the parents: What else is new? In In the wired homestead: An MIT sourcebook on the Internet and the family, ed. J. Turow and A. L. Kavanaugh, 45-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
Katz, E., and M. Gurevitch.1976. The secularization of leisure: Culture and communication in Israel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
Kenway, J., and E. Bullen.2008. Dividing delights: Children, adults and the search for sales. In International handbook of children, media and culture, ed. K. Drotner and S. Livingstone, 168-82. London: Sage.
26.
Klapper, J.T.1960. The effects of mass communication. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
27.
Kline, S.1993. Out of the garden: Toys and children’s culture in the age of TV marketing. London: Verso.
28.
Livingstone, S.1992. The meaning of domestic technologies: A personal construct analysis of familial gender relations. In Consuming technologies , ed. R. Silverstone and E. Hirsch.London: Routledge.
29.
---. 2002. Young people and new media: Childhood and the changing media environment. London: Sage .
30.
---. 2008. Engaging with media-A matter of literacy? Communication , Culture and Critique1 (1): 51-62.
31.
Livingstone, S., and M. Bober.2006. Regulating the Internet at home: Contrasting the perspectives of children and parents. In Digital generations , ed. D. Buckingham and R. Willett, 93-113. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
Livingstone, S., & Bovill, M.1999. Young People New Media. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
33.
Livingstone, S., M. Bovill, and M. Gaskell.1999. European TV kids in a transformed media world: Key findings of the UK study. In Children, television and the new media, ed. P. Lohr and M. Meyer.Luton, UK: University of Luton Press.
34.
Luke, C.1989. Pedagogy, printing and Protestantism: The discourse of childhood. Albany: State University of New York Press.
35.
---. 1990. Constructing the child viewer: A history of the American discourse on television and children, 1950-1980. New York : Praeger.
36.
MacKenzie, D., and J. Wajcman , eds. 1999. The social shaping of technology . 2nd ed. Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.
37.
Millwood Hargrave, A., and S. Livingstone.2009. Harm and offence in media content: A review of the empirical literature (2nd ed.). Bristol, UK: Intellect.
38.
Morley, D.1986. Family television: Cultural power and domestic leisure . London: Comedia.
39.
Nathanson, A.I.2004. Factual and evaluative approaches to modifying children’s responses to violent television. Journal of Communication54 (2): 321-35.
40.
Osgerby, B.1998. Youth in Britain since 1945. Oxford , UK: Blackwell.
41.
Oswell, D.2002. Television, childhood and the home: A history of the making of the child television audience in Britain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42.
Pecora, N.2007. The changing nature of children’s television: Fifty years of research. In Children and television: Fifty years of research, ed. N. Pecora, J. C. Murray, and E. A. Wartella, 1-40. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Roberts, D., U. Foehr, and V. Rideout.2005. Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
44.
Robinson, J.P., and G. Godbey.1997. Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. 2nd ed. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
45.
Rowland, W.R.1983. The politics of TV violence: Policy uses of communication research. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage .
46.
Scannell, P.1988. Radio times: The temporal arrangements of broadcasting in the modern world. In Television and its audience: International research perspectives, ed. P. Drummond and R. Paterson.London: British Film Institute.
47.
Schramm, W., J. Lyle, and E.B. Parker.1961. Television in the lives of our children . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
48.
Seiter, E.1993. Sold separately: Children and parents in consumer culture . New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
49.
Spigel, L.1992. Make room for TV: Television and the family ideal in postwar America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
Valkenburg, P.M., M. Krcmar, A.L. Peeters, and N.M. Marseille.1999. Developing a scale to assess three different styles of television mediation: "Instructive mediation," "restrictive mediation," and "social coviewing."Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media43 (1): 52-66.
51.
Wartella, E., and B. Reeves.1985. Historical trends in research on children and the media: 1900-1960. Journal of Communication35 (2): 118-33.
52.
Williams, R.1974. Television: Technology and cultural form. London: Fontana.
53.
Ziehe, T.1994. From living standard to life style. Young: Nordic Journal of Youth Research2 (2): 2-16.
