Sharing is an alternative form of distribution to commodity exchange and gift giving. Compared to these alternative modes, sharing can foster community, save resources, and create certain synergies. Yet outside of our immediate families, we do little sharing. Even within the family, there is increased privatization. This article addresses impediments to sharing as well as incentives that may encourage more sharing of both tangible and intangible goods. Two recent developments, the Internet and intellectual property rights doctrines, are locked in a battle that will do much to determine the future of sharing. Businesses may lead the way with virtual corporations outsourcing the bulk of their operations. Whether virtual consumers sharing some of their major possessions are a viable counterpart remains an open question.
Abelson, R.P.1986. Beliefs are like possessions . Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior15: 223-50 .
2.
Barbrook, R.2005. The hi-tech gift economy . First Monday . http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue3_12/barbrook/index.html (accessed November 1, 2006).
3.
Barbrook, R. , and A. Cameron2001. Californian ideology. In crypto anarchy, cyberstates, and pirate utopias, ed. P. Ludlow.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
4.
Belk, R.1979. Gift-giving behavior. In Research in marketing , vol. 2, ed. J. N. Sheth.Greenwich, CT: JAI .
5.
———. 1985. Materialism: Trait aspects of living in the material world . Journal of Consumer Research12 (3): 265-80 .
6.
———. 1987. Identity and the relevance of market, personal and community objects. In Marketing and semiotics: New directions for the study of signs for sale, ed. Jean Umiker-Sebeok.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter .
7.
———. 1988. Possessions and the extended self . Journal of Consumer Research15: 139-68 .
8.
———. 1990. How perceptions of the body influence organ donation and transplantation: Me and thee versus mine and thine. In Psychological research on organ donation, ed. J. Shanteau and R. J. HarrisWashington, DC: American Psychological Association .
9.
———. 1992. Attachment to possessions. In Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research, vol. 12, Place attachment , ed. I. Altman and S. Low.New York: Plenum .
10.
———. 1996. The perfect gift. In Gift giving: A research anthology, ed. C. Otnes and R. F. BeltraminiBowling Green, OH: Bowling Green University Popular Press .
11.
———. 2000. Consumption patterns of the new elite in Zimbabwe . Journal of Macromarketing20: 204-5 .
12.
———. 2005. Exchange taboos from an interpretive perspective . Journal of Consumer Psychology15 (1): 16-21 .
13.
Belk, R. , and G. Coon.1993. Gift giving as agapic love: An alternative to the exchange paradigm based on dating experiences . Journal of Consumer Research20: 393-417 .
14.
Belk, R. and G. Tumbat.2005. The cult of Mac. Consumption, Markets andCulture8: 205-18 .
15.
Benjamin, W.1968. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction . In Illuminations , ed. H. Arendt, trans. Harry Zohn. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World .
16.
Benkler, Y.2005. Coase's penguin, or, Linux and the nature of the firm . In Code: Collaborative ownership and the digital economy , ed. R. Ghosh.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
17.
Bergquist, M.2003. Open source software development as gift culture: Work and identity formation in an Internet community. In New technologies at work: People, screens, and social virtuality, ed. C. Garsten and H. WulffOxford , UK: Berg .
18.
Bergquist, M. , and J. Ljungberg.2001. The power of gifts: Organizing social relationships in open source communities . Information Systems Journal11: 305-20 .
19.
Boyle, J.2005. Fencing off ideas: Enclosure and the disappearance of the public domain. In Code: Collaborative ownership and the digital economy, ed. R. Ghosh , 235-58. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
20.
Boyle, T.C.1998. Filthy with things. In T. C. Boyle stories . London: Penguin .
21.
Carrier, J.1995. Gifts and commodities: Exchange and Western capitalism since 1700. London: Routledge .
22.
Coyne, R.2005. Cornucopia limited: Design and dissent on the Internet . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
23.
David, P.A.2005. From keeping “nature's secrets” to the institutionalization of “open science.” In Code: Collaborative ownership and the digital economy, ed. R. Ghosh.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
24.
Davis, N.2000. The gift in sixteenth-century France. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press .
25.
Derrida, J.1992. Given time. I, Counterfeit money. Trans. P. Kamuf. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
26.
DiMaggio, P.1982. Cultural entrepreneurship in nineteenth-centuryBoston : The classification and framing of American art. Media, Culture and Society4: 303-22 .
27.
Douglas, M. , and B. Isherwood.1979. The world of goods: Towards an anthropology of consumption. New York: Norton .
28.
Elgin, D.1998. Voluntary simplicity, revised edition: Toward a way of life that is outwardly simple, inwardly rich. New York : Harper .
29.
Etzioni, A.1988. The moral dimension: Toward a new economics. New York: Free Press .
30.
Fiske, A.P.1991. Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations, communal sharing, authority ranking, equality matching, and market pricing. New York: Free Press .
31.
Foster, G.M.1969. Peasant society and the image of limited good. In Applied anthropology, ed. G. M. Foster.Boston: Little, Brown .
32.
———. 1972. The anatomy of envy: A study of symbolic behavior . Current Anthropology13: 165-82 .
33.
Frow, J.1997. Time and commodity culture: Essays in cultural theory and postmodernity. Oxford, UK: Clarendon .
34.
Furby, L.1976. The socialization of possession and ownership among children in three cultural groups: Israeli kibbutz, Israeli city, and American. In Piagetian research: Compilation and commentary, vol. 1, ed. S. Modgil and C. Modgil.Windsor , UK: NFER Publishing .
35.
———. 1978. Sharing: Decisions and moral judgments about letting others use one's personal possessions . Psychological Reports93: 595-609 .
36.
Gerrard, G.1989. Everyone will be jealous for that mutika . Mankind19 (2): 95-111 .
37.
Ghosh, R. , ed. 2005. Code: Collaborative ownership and the digital economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
38.
Giesler, M.2006. Consumer gift system: Netnographic insights from Napster . Journal of Consumer Research33: 283-90 .
39.
Godbout, J.T. , and A. Caille1998. The world of the gift. Trans. D. Winkler. Montreal, Canada : McGill-Queen's University Press .
40.
Gould, R.A.1982. To have and have not: The ecology of sharing among hunter-gatherers . In Resource managers: North American and Australian hunter-gatherers , ed. N. M. Williams and E. S. Hunn.Boulder, CO: Westview .
41.
Granovetter , Mark. 1985 . Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness . American Journal of Sociology91 (November): 481-510 .
42.
Gregory, C.A.1982. Gifts and commodities. London: Academic Press .
43.
———. 1997. Savage money: The anthropology and politics of commodity exchange. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic .
44.
Hammerslough, J.2001. Dematerializing: Taming the power of possessions. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing .
45.
Hardin, G.1968. The tragedy of the commons . Science162: 1243-48 .
46.
Hayden, C.2005. Benefit-sharing: Experiments in governance. In Code: Collaborative ownership and the digital economy, ed. R. Ghosh.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
47.
Hyde, L.1983. The gift: Imagination and the erotic life of property . New York: Random House .
48.
Inglehart, R.1981. Post-materialism in an environment of insecurity . American Political Science Review75: 880-900 .
49.
Jones, A.1996. Philanthropy in the African American experience. In Giving: Western ideas of philanthropy, ed. J. B. Schweewind.Bloomington: Indiana University Press .
50.
Kelty, C.2005. Trust among the algorithms: Ownership, identity, and the collaborative stewardship of information. In Code: Collaborative ownership and the digital economy, ed. R. Ghosh.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
51.
Kleine, S.S. , and S.M. Baker.2004. An integrative review of material possession attachment . Academy of Marketing Science Review1: 1-39 .
52.
Kleine, S.S. , R.E. Kleine III, and C.T. Allen .1995. How is a possession “me” or “not me”? Characterizing types and an antecedent of material possession attachment . Journal of Consumer Research22: 327-43 .
53.
Komter, A.E.2005. Social solidarity and the gift. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
54.
Love, J. , and T. Hubbard.2005. Paying for public goods. In Code: Collaborative ownership and the digital economy, ed. R. Ghosh.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
55.
Maddock, K.1972. The Australian Aborigines: A portrait of their society . London: Penguin .
56.
Malraux, A.1967. Museums without walls. Ed. S. Gilbert and F. Price.Garden City, NY: Doubleday .
57.
Mauss, M.1967. The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. I. Trans. Ian Cunnison. New York: Norton .
58.
McGraw, A.P. , P.E. Tetlock , and O.V. Kristel.2003. The limits of fungibility: Relational schemata and the value of things . Journal of Consumer Research30: 219-29 .
59.
Miller, D.2001. Alienable gifts and inalienable commodities. In The empire of things: Regimes of value and material culture, ed. Fred R. Myers , 91-115. Oxford , UK: School of American Research Press .
60.
Muñiz, A.M. , Jr., and T. O'Guinn .2001. Brand community . Journal of Consumer Research27: 412-33 .
61.
Osteen, M.2002. Gift or commodity? In The question of the gift: Essays across disciplines, ed. Mark OsteenLondon: Routledge .
62.
Pareles, J.2005. The Dead's gamble: Free music for sale . New York Times (online edition), December 3.
63.
Peters, Annette , Stephanie von Klot, Margit Heier , Ines Trentinaglia , Allmut Hörmann , H. Erich Wichmann , and Hannelore Löwel.2004. Exposure to traffic and the onset of myocardial infarction . New England Journal of Medicine351 (17): 1721-30 .
64.
Pinchot, G.1995. The gift economy. Context: A Quarterly of Humane Sustainable Culture. http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC41/PinchotG.htm (accessed November 1, 2006).
65.
Pine, J.B. , II, and J.H. Gilmore .1999. The experience economy: Work as theatre and every business a stage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press .
66.
Raymond, E.S.2001. The hacker milieu as gift culture . Future Positive. http://futurepositive.synearth.net/stories/storyReader$223 (accessed November 1, 2006).
67.
Reece, S.1993. The stranger's welcome: Oral theory and the aesthetics of the Homeric hospitality scene. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press .
68.
Rheingold, H.2000. The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
69.
Roberts, S.1996. Contexts of charity in the Middle Ages: Religious, social, and civic. In Giving: Western ideas of philanthropy, ed. J. B. Schweewind.Bloomington : Indiana University Press .
70.
Rupp, K.2003. Gift-giving in Japan: Cash, connections, cosmologies. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
71.
Sahlins, M.1972. Stone age economics. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton .
72.
Schor, J.B.1998. The overspent American: Upscaling, downshifting, and the new consumer. New York: Basic Books .
73.
Sherry, J.F. , Jr. 1983. Gift giving in anthropological perspective . Journal of Consumer Research10: 157-68 .
74.
Sherry, J.F. , Jr., M.A. McGrath , and S.J. Levy.1992. The disposition of the gift and many unhappy returns . Journal of Retailing38 (1): 40-65 .
75.
———. 1993. The dark side of the gift . Journal of Business Research28: 225-44 .
76.
Sieber, J.E.1991. Sharing social science data: Advantages and challenges . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
77.
Silver, A.1990. Friendship in commercial society: Eighteenth-century social theory and modern Sociology . American Journal of Sociology95: 1474-1504 .
78.
Simmel, G.1990. The philosophy of money. Trans. Bottomore and D. Frisby . London: Routledge .
79.
Testart, A.1987. Game sharing systems and kinship systems among hunter-gatherers . Man22 (2): 287-304 .
80.
Varian, H.R.2000. Buying, sharing and renting information goods. http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/∼hal/Papers/sharing.pdf (accessed November 1, 2006).
81.
Vaughan, G.1997. For-giving: A feminist critique of exchange. Austin, TX: Plain View Press .
82.
Wallendorf, M. , and E.J. Arnould.1988. “ My favorite things”: A cross-cultural inquiry into object attachment, possessiveness, and social linkage . Journal of Consumer Research14: 531-47 .
83.
Webley, P. , S.L. Lea , and R. Portalska.1983. The unacceptability of money as a gift . Journal of Economic Psychology4: 223-38 .
84.
Weiner, A.1992. Inalienable possessions: The paradox of keeping-while-giving . Berkeley: University of California Press .
85.
Windfield, Nick.2005. In a dizzying world, one way to keep up: Renting possessions . Wall Street Journal, October 17, p. A1 .
86.
Yan, Y.1996. The flow of gifts: Reciprocity and social networks in a Chinese village. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
