Social scientists interested in criminal activity have generally neglected the topic of democracy, while researchers interested in the topic of democracy have virtually ignored criminal activity. This confluence of neglect has been especially obvious in research on intellectual property (IP) theft. In this study, the authors examine the interrelationship between democracy and IP theft—specifically software piracy. Piracy data from eighty-two countries between the years 1995 and 2000 are used to examine how democratization relates to rates of software piracy. The authors use trajectory methodology to identify distinct offender groups, which vary in their rates of software piracy. The current research has two specific goals: (1) to identify distinct trajectories of software piracy offenders at the international level and (2) to examine how these groups vary according to several measures of democratic strength. The authors hypothesize that more democratic countries (including those that have strong political and civil liberties) will have lower software piracy rates.
Alford, William P.1996/1997. Making the world safe for what? Intellectual property rights, human rights and foreign economic policy in the post-European cold war world. Journal of International Law and Politics29:135-152.
2.
Allum, Felia, and Renate Siebert, eds. 2003. Organized crime: The challenge to democracy. London: Routledge.
3.
Altbach, Philip G.1988. Economic progress brings copyright to Asia. Far East Economic Review139 (9): 62-63.
4.
Barber, Benjamin R.1984. Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
Bremer, Stuart. 1992. Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816-1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution36:309-341.
6.
Business Software Alliance (BSA). 2001. Sixth Annual BSA Global Software Piracy Study. May. Washington, DC: International Planning and Research Corporation.
7.
Cheng, Hsing K., Ronald R. Sims, and Hildy Teegen. 1997. To purchase or to pirate software: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems13 (4): 49-60.
8.
Christensen, Anne L., and Martha M. Eining. 1991. Factors influencing software piracy: Implications for accountants. Journal of Information Systems5 (spring): 67-80.
9.
Cohen, Eli, and Larry Cornwell. 1989. A question of ethics: Developing information systems ethics. Journal of Business Ethics8:431-437.
10.
Drahos, Peter. 2002. Developing countries and international intellectual property standard-setting. Journal of World Intellectual Property5 (5): 765-789.
11.
Drahos, Peter, and John Braithwaite. 2001/2002. Intellectual property, corporate strategy, globalisation: TRIPS in context. Wisconsin International Law Journal20 (3): 451-480.
12.
Dudas, Jon W. 2004. Statement of Jon W. Dudas, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, before the Committee on Judiciary, United States Senate. March 23. http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/speeches/2004mar23.htm (accessed August 25, 2005).
13.
D’Unger, Amy V., Kenneth C. Land, and Patricia L. McCall. 1998. How many latent classes of delinquent/criminal careers? Results from mixed Poisson regression analyses. American Journal of Sociology103 (6): 1593-1630.
14.
Freedom House. 1996. World Survey of Economic Freedom 1995-1996: A Freedom House study. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
15.
Friedman, Thomas L.2005. The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
16.
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. 2003. Modified Polity P4 and P4D data, version 1.0. http://weber.ucsd.edu/%7Ekgledits/Polity.html.
17.
Gopal, Ram D., and G. Lawrence Sanders. 1997. Preventive and deterrent controls for software piracy. Journal of Management Information Systems13 (4): 29-47.
18.
Greenberg, David F., ed. 1981. Crime and capitalism: Readings in Marxist criminology. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
19.
Hinduja, Sameer. 2001. Correlates of internet software piracy. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice17 (4): 369-382.
20.
International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI). 2003. The record industry commercial piracy report, 2003. London: IFPI.
21.
Jones, Bobby L., Daniel S. Nagin, and Kathryn Roeder. 2001. A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociological Methods and Research29:374-393.
22.
Keane, John. 2004. Violence and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Kim, Sang-Weon, and William A. Pridemore. 2005. Social change, institutional anomie, and serious property crime in transitional Russia. British Journal of Criminology45:81-97.
24.
Kini, Ranjan B., H. V. Ramakrishna, and B. S. Vijayaraman. 2003. An exploratory study of moral intensity regarding software piracy of students in Thailand. Behaviour and Information Technology22 (1): 63-70.
25.
Krain, Matthew. 1998. Contemporary democracies revisited: Democracy, political violence, and event count models. Comparative Political Studies31 (2): 139-164.
26.
LaFree, Gary. 2003. Criminology and democracy. The Criminologist28 (1): 1-5
27.
LaFree, Gary. 2005. Evidence for elite convergence in cross-national homicide victimization trends, 1956-2000. Sociological Quarterly46:191-211.
28.
Maher, Megan K., and Jon Michael Thompson. 2002. Intellectual property crimes. American Criminal Law Review39 (2): 763-816.
29.
Moran, J.2001. Democratic transitions and forms of corruption. Crime, Law, and Social Change36:379-393.
30.
Motion Picture Association (MPA). 2003. 2003 piracy fact sheets: US overview. Los Angeles: MPA Worldwide Market Research.
31.
Nagin, Daniel S.2005. Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
Nagin, Daniel S., and Kenneth C. Land. 1993. Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: Specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed poisson model. Criminology31:327-362.
33.
Nagin, Daniel S., and Richard E. Tremblay. 2005. Developmental trajectory groups: Fact or a useful statistical fiction?Criminology43 (4): 873-904.
34.
Netanel, Neil W.1996. Copyright and a democratic civil society. Yale Law Journal106 (2): 283-387.
35.
Neuman, W. Lawrence, and Ronald J. Berger. 1988. Competing perspectives on cross-national crime: An evaluation of theory and evidence. Sociological Quarterly29:281-313.
36.
Piquero, Nicole Leeper. 2005. Causes and prevention of intellectual property crime. Trends in Organized Crime8 (4): 40-61.
37.
Powell, G. Bingham. 1982. Contemporary democracies: Participation, stability, and violence. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
38.
Rapp, Robert, and Richard P. Rozek. 1990. Benefits and costs of intellectual property protection in developing countries. Journal of World Trade6 (2): 75-102.
39.
Reichman, Jerome H.1996/1997. From free riders to fair followers: Global competition under the TRIPS agreement. New York University International Journal of Law and Politics29:11-93.
40.
Ronkainen, Ilkka A., and Jose-Luis Guerrero-Cusumano. 2001. Correlates of intellectual property violations. Multinational Business Review9:59-65.
41.
Schwarz, Gideon. 1978. Estimating dimensions of a model. Annals of Statistics6:461-464.
42.
Seale, Darryl A., Michael Polakowski, and Sherry Schneider. 1998. It’s not really theft! Personal and work-place ethics that enable software piracy. Behaviour and Information Technology17 (1): 27-40.
43.
Shim, J. P., and G. Stephen Taylor. 1989. Practicing manager’s perception/attitude toward illegal software copying. OR/MS Today16:30-33.
44.
Shore, Barry, A.R. Venkatachalam, Eleanne Solorzano, Janice M. Burn, Syed Zahoor Hassan, and Lech J. Janczewski. 2001. Softlifting and piracy: Behavior across cultures. Technology in Society23:563-581.
45.
Sims, Ronald R., Hsing K. Cheng, and Hildy Teegen. 1996. Toward a profile of student software pirates. Journal of Business Ethics15:839-849.
46.
Solomon, S. L., and J. A. O’Brien. 1990. The effect of demographic factors on attitudes toward software piracy. Journal of Computer Information Systems30:40-46.
47.
Steidlmeier, Paul. 1993. The moral legitimacy of intellectual property claims: American business and developing country perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics12 (2): 157-164.
48.
Sung, Hung-En.2004. Democracy and political corruption: A cross-national comparison. Crime, Law, and Social Change41:179-194.
49.
Swinyard, W. R., H. Rinne, and A. Keng Kau. 1990. The morality of software piracy: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Business Ethics9:655-664.
50.
Taylor, G. Stephen, and J. P. Shim. 1993. A comparative examination of attitudes toward software piracy among business professors and executives. Human Relations46:419-433.
51.
Taylor, I., P. Walton, and J. Young. 1973. The new criminology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
52.
Vold, George B., Thomas J. Bernard, and Jeffrey B. Snipes. 1998. Theoretical criminology. 4th ed.New York: Oxford University Press.
53.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The modern world-system. Vol. 1, Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. New York: Academic Press.
54.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1991. Geopolitics and geoculture: Essays on the changing world-system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
