Prior research has advanced several explanations for entrepreneurial success in nascent markets but leaves a key imperative unexplored: the business model. By studying five ventures in a nascent financial-technology market, we develop a novel theoretical framework for understanding how entrepreneurs effectively design business models: parallel play. Similar to parallel play by preschoolers, entrepreneurs engaged in parallel play interweave action, cognition, and timing to accelerate learning about a novel world. Specifically, they (1) borrow from peers and focus on established substitutes for their services or products, (2) test assumptions, then commit to a broad business-model template, and (3) pause before elaborating the activity system. The insights from our framework contribute to research on optimal distinctiveness and to the learning and evolutionary-adjustment literatures. More broadly, we blend organization theory with a fresh theoretical lens—business-model processes—to highlight how organizations actually work and create value.
AdnerR.KapoorR.2016 “Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Reexamining technology S-curves.” Strategic Management Journal, 37: 625–648.
2.
AfuahA.TucciC. L.2000Internet Business Models and Strategies: Text and Cases. New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
3.
AhujaG.NovelliE.2016 “Incumbent responses to an entrant with a new business model: Resource co-deployment and resource re-deployment strategies.” In FoltaT.HelfatC.KarimS. (eds.), Advances in Strategic Management: Resource Redeployment and Corporate Strategy, 35: 125–153. Bingley, UK: Emerald Insight.
4.
AmitR.ZottC.2012 “Creating value through business model innovation.” MIT Sloan Management Review, 53: 41–49.
5.
AmitR.ZottC.2015 “Crafting business architecture: The antecedents of business model design.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9: 331–350.
6.
AndersonP.TushmanM. L.1990 “Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 604–633.
7.
AnthonyC.NelsonA. J.TripsasM.2016 “‘Who are you? . . . I really wanna know’: Product meaning and competitive positioning in the nascent synthesizer industry.” Strategy Science, 1: 163–183.
8.
BakemanR.BrownleeJ. R.1980 “The strategic use of parallel play: A sequential analysis.” Child Development, 51: 873–878.
9.
BakerT.NelsonR. E.2005 “Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 329–366.
10.
BattilanaJ.LecaB.BoxenbaumE.2009 “How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship.” Academy of Management Annals, 3: 65–107.
11.
BaumannO.SiggelkowN.2013 “Dealing with complexity: Integrated vs. chunky search processes.” Organization Science, 24: 116–132.
12.
BennerM. J.TripsasM.2012 “The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras.” Strategic Management Journal, 33: 277–302.
13.
BermissY. S.HallenB. L.McDonaldR.PahnkeE. C.2017 “Entrepreneurial beacons: The Yale endowment, run-ups, and the growth of venture capital.” Strategic Management Journal, 38: 545–565.
14.
BinghamC. B.EisenhardtK. M.2011 “Rational heuristics: The ‘simple rules’ that strategists learn from process experience.” Strategic Management Journal, 32: 1437–1464.
15.
BinghamL. B.O’LearyR.2006 “Conclusion: Parallel play, not collaboration: Missing questions, missing connections.” Public Administration Review, 66: 161–167.
16.
BlankS.2013 “Why the lean start-up changes everything.” Harvard Business Review, 91: 63–72.
17.
BremnerR. P.EisenhardtK. M.2019 “Experimentation, bottlenecks, and organizational form: Innovation and growth in the nascent drone industry.” Working paper, Stanford Technology Ventures Program.
18.
BrownS. L.EisenhardtK. M.1997 “The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 1–34.
19.
Casadesus-MasanellR.ZhuF.2013 “Business model innovation and competitive imitation: The case of sponsor-based business models.” Strategic Management Journal, 34: 464–482.
20.
ChenE. L.KatilaR.McDonaldR.EisenhardtK. M.2010 “Life in the fast lane: Origins of competitive interaction in new vs. established markets.” Strategic Management Journal, 31: 1527–1547.
21.
ChesbroughH.RosenbloomR. S.2002 “The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies.” Industrial and Corporate Change, 11: 529–555.
22.
ContigianiA.LevinthalD.2019 “Situating the construct of lean startup: Adjacent ‘conversations’ and possible future directions.” Industrial and Corporate Change, forthcoming.
23.
DalpiazE.RindovaV.RavasiD.2016 “Combining logics to transform organizational agency: Blending industry and art at Alessi.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 61: 347–392.
24.
DavisJ. P.EisenhardtK. M.BinghamC. B.2009 “Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 54: 413–452.
25.
DeephouseD. L.1999 “To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance.” Strategic Management Journal, 20: 147–166.
26.
DemilB.LecocqX.RicartJ. E.ZottC.2015 “Introduction to the SEJ special issue on business models: Business models within the domain of strategic entrepreneurship.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9: 1–11.
27.
DeSantolaA.GulatiR.2017 “Scaling: Organizing and growth in entrepreneurial ventures.” Academy of Management Annals, 11: 640–668.
28.
EisenhardtK. M.1989a “Building theories from case study research.” Academy of Management Review, 14: 532–550.
29.
EisenhardtK. M.1989b “Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments.” Academy of Management Journal, 32: 543–576.
30.
EisenhardtK. M.BinghamC. B.2017 “Superior strategy in entrepreneurial settings: Thinking, doing, and the logic of opportunity.” Strategy Science, 2: 246–257.
31.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E.2007 “Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges.” Academy of Management Journal, 50: 25–32.
32.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E.SonensheinS.2016 “Grand challenges and inductive methods: Rigor without rigor mortis.” Academy of Management Journal, 59: 1113–1123.
33.
EisenhardtK. M.TabriziB. N.1995 “Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 84–110.
34.
EisenmannT. R.2001Internet Business Models: Text and Cases. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
35.
EisenmannT.RiesE.DillardS.2013 “Hypothesis-driven entrepreneurship: The lean startup.” Harvard Business School Background Note 812–095, July10.
36.
ElsbachK. D.StiglianiI.2018 “Design thinking and organizational culture: A review and framework for future research.” Journal of Management, 44: 2274–2306.
37.
GaoC.McDonaldR. M.2019 “Shaping nascent industries: Innovation strategy and regulatory uncertainty in personal genomics.” Working paper, Harvard Business School.
38.
GaoC.ZuzulT.JonesG.KhannaT.2017 “Overcoming institutional voids: A reputation-based view of long-run survival.” Strategic Management Journal, 38: 2147–2167.
39.
GavettiG.LevinthalD. A.RivkinJ. W.2005 “Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy.” Strategic Management Journal, 26: 691–712.
40.
GavettiG.RivkinJ.2007 “On the origins of strategy: Action and cognition over time.” Organization Science, 18: 420–439.
41.
HannahD. P.EisenhardtK. M.2018 “How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems.” Strategic Management Journal, 39: 3163–3192.
42.
HargadonA. B.DouglasY.2001 “When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 476–501.
43.
HiattS. R.CarlosW. C.2018 “From farms to fuel tanks: Stakeholder framing contests and entrepreneurship in the emergent U.S. biodiesel market.” Strategic Management Journal, published online ahead of print. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2989.
44.
HuberG.1985 “Temporal stability and response-order biases in participant descriptions of organizational decisions.” Academy of Management Journal, 28: 943–950.
45.
HuberG.PowerD.1985 “Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy.” Strategic Management Journal, 6: 171–180.
46.
JenningsJ.JenningsP. D.GreenwoodR.2006 “The strategic positioning of professional service firm start-ups: Balance beguiles but purism pays.” Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 24: 45–68.
47.
JickT.1979 “Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 602–611.
48.
JohnsonM.ChristensenC.KagermannH.2008 “Reinventing your business model.” Harvard Business Review, 86: 50–59.
49.
KatilaR.ChenE. L.2008 “Effects of search timing on innovation: The value of not being in sync with rivals.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 593–625.
50.
KerrW.LernerJ.SchoarA.2014 “The consequences of entrepreneurial finance: Evidence from angel financings.” Review of Financial Studies, 27: 20–55.
51.
KerrW.NandaR.Rhodes-KropfM.2014 “Entrepreneurship as experimentation.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28: 25–48.
52.
KumarN.SternL.AndersonJ.1993 “Conducting interorganizational research using key informants.” Academy of Management Journal, 36: 1633–1651.
53.
LangleyA.1999 “Strategies for theorizing from process data.” Academy of Management Review, 24: 691–710.
54.
LounsburyM.GlynnM. A.2001 “Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources.” Strategic Management Journal, 22: 545–564.
55.
LounsburyM.RaoH.2004 “Sources of durability and change in market classifications: A study of the reconstitution of product categories in the American mutual fund industry, 1944–1985.” Social Forces, 82: 969–999.
56.
MartinsL. L.RindovaV. P.GreenbaumB. E.2015 “Unlocking the hidden value of concepts: A cognitive approach to business model innovation.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9: 99–117.
57.
MarxM.HsuD.2015 “Strategic ‘switchbacks’: Dynamic commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs.” Research Policy, 44: 1815–1826.
58.
MassaL.TucciC. L.AfuahA.2017 “A critical assessment of business model research.” Academy of Management Annals, 11: 73–104.
59.
McDonaldR.GaoC.2019 “Pivoting isn’t enough: Managing strategic reorientation in new ventures.” Organization Science, forthcoming.
60.
MinerA.BassoffP.MoormanC.2001 “Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 304–337.
61.
MurrayF.TripsasM.2004 “The exploratory processes of entrepreneurial firms: The role of purposeful experimentation.” In BaumJ. A. C.McGahanA. M. (eds.), Business Strategy over the Industry Lifecycle: 45–75. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
62.
NavisC.GlynnM. A.2010 “How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 439–471.
63.
NavisC.GlynnM. A.2011 “Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility.” Academy of Management Review, 36: 479–499.
64.
OttT. E.EisenhardtK. M.BinghamC. B.2017 “Strategy formation in entrepreneurial settings: Past insights and future directions.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11: 306–325.
65.
OzcanP.EisenhardtK.2009 “Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network strategies, and firm performance.” Academy of Management Journal, 52: 246–279.
66.
PahnkeE.McDonaldR.WangD.HallenB.2015 “Exposed: Venture capital, competitor ties, and entrepreneurial innovation.” Academy of Management Journal, 58: 1334–1360.
67.
PartenM. B.1932 “Social participation among pre-school children.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 27 (3): 243–269.
68.
PiezunkaH.DahlanderL.2014 “Distant search, narrow attention: How crowding alters organizations’ filtering of suggestions in crowdsourcing.” Academy of Management Journal, 58: 856–880.
69.
PisanoG. P.1994 “Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development.” Strategic Management Journal, 15: 85–100.
70.
PorterM.1996 “What is strategy?”Harvard Business Review, 74: 61–78.
71.
RaffaelliR.2018 “Technology reemergence: Creating new value for old technologies in Swiss mechanical watchmaking, 1970–2008.” Administrative Science Quarterly, published online ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/0001839218778505.
72.
RaffaelliR.GlynnM. A.TushmanM.2019 “Flexing the frame: The role of cognitive and emotional framing in innovation adoption by incumbent firms.” Strategic Management Journal, forthcoming.
73.
RaoH.1994 “The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912.” Strategic Management Journal, 15: 29–44.
74.
RiesE.2011The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. New York: Crown Business.
75.
RindovaV.KothaS.2001 “Continuous morphing: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form and function.” Academy of Management Journal, 44: 1263–1280.
76.
RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.ParkerJ. G.1998 “Peer interactions, relationships, and groups.” In DamonW.EisenbergN. (eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology: 619–700. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
77.
SantosF.EisenhardtK. M.2009 “Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial agency in nascent fields.” Academy of Management Journal, 52: 643–671.
78.
ShihW.KaufmanS.2014 “Netflix in 2011.” Harvard Business School Case 615-007.
79.
SmithP. K.1978 “A longitudinal study of social participation in preschool children: Solitary and parallel play reexamined.” Developmental Psychology, 14: 517–523.
80.
SnihurY.ZottC.2019 “The genesis and metamorphosis of imprints: How business model innovation evolves in young ventures.” Academy of Management Journal, published online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0706.
81.
ThomkeS. H.1998 “Managing experimentation in the design of new products.” Management Science, 44: 743–762.
82.
ThomkeS.ReinertsenD.1998 “Agile product development: Managing development flexibility in uncertain environments.” California Management Review, 41 (1): 8–30.
83.
ThomkeS.von HippelE.2002 “Customers as innovators: A new way to create value.” Harvard Business Review, 80: 74–85.
84.
TripsasM.GavettiG.2000 “Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging.” Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1147–1161.
85.
WeberK.HeinzeK.DeSouceyM.2008 “Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products.” Administrative Science Quarterly. 53: 529–567.
86.
WryT.LounsburyM.JenningsP. D.2014 “Hybrid vigor: Securing venture capital by spanning categories in nanotechnology.” Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1309–1333.
87.
YinR.2009Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
88.
ZhaoE. Y.FisherG.LounsburyM.MillerD.2017 “Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management.” Strategic Management Journal, 38: 93–113.
89.
ZhaoE. Y.IshiharaM.JenningsP. D.LounsburyM.2018 “Optimal distinctiveness in the console video game industry: An exemplar-based model of proto-category evolution.” Organization Science, published online ahead of print. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2017.1194.
90.
ZottC.AmitR.2007 “Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms.” Organization Science, 18: 181–199.
91.
ZottC.AmitR.2016 “Business model innovation: Toward a process perspective.” In ShalleyC. E.HittM. A.ZhouJ. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship: 395–406. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
92.
ZottC.AmitR.MassaL.2011 “The business model: Recent developments and future research.” Journal of Management, 37: 1019–1042.
93.
ZuzulT.EdmondsonA.2017 “The advocacy trap: When legitimacy building inhibits organizational learning.” Academy of Management Discoveries, 3: 302–321.
94.
ZuzulT.TripsasM.2019 “Start-up inertia versus flexibility: The role of founder identity in a nascent industry.” Administrative Science Quarterly, published online ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/0001-839219843486.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
