Despite lab-based evidence supporting the argument that double standards—by which one group is unfairly held to stricter standards than another—explain observed gender differences in evaluations, it remains unclear whether double standards also affect evaluations in organization and market contexts, where competitive pressures create a disincentive to discriminate. Using data from a field study of investment professionals sharing recommendations on an online platform, and drawing on status theory, we identify the conditions under which double standards in multistage evaluations contribute to unequal outcomes for men and women. We find that double standards disadvantaging women are most likely when evaluators face heightened search costs related to the number of candidates being compared or higher levels of uncertainty stemming from variation in the amount of pertinent information available. We rule out that systematic gender differences in the actions or characteristics of the investment professionals being evaluated are driving these results. By more carefully isolating the role of this status-based mechanism of discrimination for perpetuating gender inequality, this study identifies not only whether but also the conditions under which gender-based double standards lead to a female disadvantage, even when relevant and objective information about performance is readily available.
AltonjiJ. G.BlankR. M.1999“Race and gender in the labor market.” In AshenfelterO. C.CardD. E. (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3, part C: 3143–3259. New York: Elsevier.
3.
ArrowK.1971Some Models of Racial Discrimination in the Labor Market. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation: 1–54.
4.
AzoulayP.StuartT.WangY.2014“Matthew: Effect or fable?” Management Science, 60: 92–109.
5.
BaldigaK.2013“Gender differences in willingness to guess.”Management Science, 60: 434–448.
6.
BarberB. M.OdeanT.2001“Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116: 261–292.
7.
BeckerG. S.1957The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BeckmanC. M.PhillipsD. J.2005“Interorganizational determinants of promotion: Client leadership and the attainment of women attorneys.”American Sociological Review, 70: 678–701.
9.
BeckmannD.MenkhoffL.2008“Will women be women? Analyzing the gender difference among financial experts.”Kyklos, 61: 364–384.
10.
BergerJ.1977Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach. New York: Elsevier Scientific.
11.
BergerJ.RosenholtzS. J.ZelditchM.Jr.1980“Status organizing processes.”Annual Review of Sociology, 6: 479–508.
12.
BertrandM.MullainathanS.2004“Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination.”American Economic Review, 94: 991–1013.
13.
BiernatM.KobrynowiczD.WeberD. L.2003“Stereotypes and shifting standards: Some paradoxical effects of cognitive load.”Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33: 2060–2079.
14.
BotelhoT. L.2016“Here’s an opportunity: Knowledge sharing among competitors as a response to uncertainty.” Working paper, MIT Sloan.
15.
BromileyP.CurleyS. P.1992“Individual differences in risk taking.” In YatesJ. F. (ed.), Risk-taking Behavior: 87–132. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
16.
BrooksA. W.HuangL.KearneyS. W.MurrayF. E.2014“Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111: 4427–4431.
17.
CastillaE. J.2008“Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers.”American Journal of Sociology, 113: 1479–1526.
18.
CharlesK. K.GuryanJ.2008“Prejudice and wages: An empirical assessment of Becker’s The Economics of Discrimination.”Journal of Political Economy, 116: 773–809.
19.
CorrellS. J.BenardS.2006“Biased estimators? Comparing status and statistical theories of gender discrimination.” In ThyeS. R.LawlerE. J. (eds.), Advances in Group Processes, 23: 89–116. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
20.
CorrellS.RidgewayC.2003“Expectation states theory.” In DeLamaterJ. (ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology: 29–51. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
21.
DeauxK.MajorB.1987“Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior.”Psychological Review, 94: 369–389.
22.
DingW. W.MurrayF.StuartT. E.2006“Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences.”Science, 313: 665–667.
23.
EnglandP.HerbertM. S.KilbourneB. S.ReidL. L.MegdalL. M.1994“The gendered valuation of occupations and skills: Earnings in 1980 census occupations.”Social Forces, 73: 65–100.
24.
Fernandez-MateoI.2009“Cumulative gender disadvantage in contract employment.”American Journal of Sociology, 114: 871–923.
25.
FernandezR. M.Fernandez-MateoI.2006“Networks, race, and hiring.”American Sociological Review, 71: 42–71.
FoschiM.1989“Status characteristics, standards, and attributions.” In BergerJ.ZelditchM.AndersonB. (eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress: New Formulations: 58–72. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.
FoschiM.1996“Double standards in the evaluation of men and women.”Social Psychology Quarterly, 59: 237–254.
29.
FoschiM.2000“Double standards for competence: Theory and research.”Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 21–42.
30.
FoschiM.2009“Gender, performance level, and competence standards in task groups.”Social Science Research, 38: 447–457.
31.
FoschiM.FoddyM.1988“Standards, performances, and the formation of self–other expectations.” In WebsterM.FoschiM. (eds.), Status Generalization: New Theory and Research: 248–260. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
32.
FoschiM.SigersonK.LembesisM.1995“Assessing job applicants—The relative effects of gender, academic record, and decision type.”Small Group Research, 26: 328–352.
33.
FoschiM.ValenzuelaJ.2008“Selecting job applicants: Effects from gender, self-presentation, and decision type.”Social Science Research, 37: 1022–1038.
34.
FoschiM.ValenzuelaJ.2012“Who is the better applicant? Effects from gender, academic record, and type of decision.”Social Science Research, 41: 949–964.
35.
FriedmanD.1994Experimental Methods: A Primer for Economists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GormanE.2006“Work uncertainty and the promotion of professional women: The case of law firm partnership.”Social Forces, 85: 865–890.
38.
HäublG.TriftsV.2000“Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: The effects of interactive decision aids.”Marketing Science, 19: 4–21.
39.
HeilmanM. E.1980“The impact of situational factors on personnel decisions concerning women: Varying the sex composition of the applicant pool.”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26: 386–395.
40.
HinzR. P.McCarthyD. D.TurnerJ. A.1997“Are women conservative investors? Gender differences in participant directed pension investments.” In GordonM. S.MitchellO. S.TwinneyM. M. (eds.), Positioning Pensions for the Twenty-first Century: 91–103. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
41.
JensenM.2006“Should we stay or should we go? Accountability, status anxiety, and client defections.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 51: 97–128.
42.
JianakoplosN. A.BernasekA.1998“Are women more risk averse?” Economic Inquiry, 36: 620–630.
43.
KimJ. W.KingB. G.2014“Seeing stars: Matthew Effects and status bias in Major League Baseball umpiring.”Management Science, 60: 2619–2644.
44.
KovácsB.SharkeyA. J.2014“The paradox of publicity: How awards can negatively affect the evaluation of quality.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 59: 1–33.
45.
MaguireF. P.2012Advanced Global Name Recognition Technology. New York: IBM.
46.
MertonR. K.1968“The Matthew Effect in science.”Science, 159: 56–63.
47.
MuchnikL.AralS.TaylorS. J.2013“Social influence bias: A randomized experiment.”Science, 341: 647–651.
PagerD.BonikowskiB.WesternB.2009“Discrimination in a low-wage labor market: A field experiment.”American Sociological Review, 74: 777–799.
52.
PhelpsE. S.1972“The statistical theory of racism and sexism.”American Economic Review, 62: 659–661.
53.
PodolnyJ. M.1993“A status-based model of market competition.”American Journal of Sociology, 98: 829–872.
54.
PodolnyJ. M.1994“Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 458–483.
55.
PodolnyJ. M.2005Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56.
ReskinB. F.1988“Bringing the men back in: Sex differentiation and the devaluation of women’s work.”Gender and Society, 2: 58–81.
57.
RidgewayC. L.CorrellS. J.2000“Limiting inequality through interaction: The end(s) of gender.”Contemporary Sociology, 29: 110–120.
58.
RidgewayC. L.CorrellS. J.2004“Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations.”Gender and Society, 18: 510–531.
59.
RidgewayC. L.Smith-LovinL.1999“The gender system and interaction.”Annual Review of Sociology, 25: 191–216.
60.
Rothstein Kass Institute2012Women in Alternative Investments: Building Momentum in 2013 and Beyond. Roseland, NJ: Rothstein Kass Institute.
61.
SalganikM. J.DoddsP. S.WattsD. J.2006“Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market.”Science, New Series, 311: 854–856.
62.
SimcoeT. S.WaguespackD. M.2011“Status, quality, and attention: What’s in a (missing) name?”Management Science, 57: 274–290.
63.
StuartT. E.HoangH.HybelsR. C.1999“Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 315–349.
64.
SundenA. E.SuretteB. J.1998“Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans.”American Economic Review, 88: 207–211.
65.
TurcoC. J.2010“Cultural foundations of tokenism: Evidence from the leveraged buyout industry.”American Sociological Review, 75: 894–913.
VanDerheiJ. L.BajtelsmitV.1997“Risk aversion and pension investment choices.” In GordonM. S.MitchellO. S.TwinneyM. M. (eds.), Positioning Pensions for the Twenty-first Century: 45–66. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
70.
WagnerD. G.BergerJ.1993“Status characteristics theory: The growth of a program.” In BergerJ.ZelditchM.Jr. (eds.), Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in the Growth of Theory: 23–63. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
71.
WebsterM.Jr.HysomS. J.1998“Creating status characteristics.”American Sociological Review, 63: 351–378.
72.
ZuckermanE. W.1999“The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount.”American Journal of Sociology, 104: 1398–1438.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
