Salient successes and failures, such as spectacular venture capital investments or agonizing bankruptcies, affect collective beliefs about the viability of particular markets. Using data on software start-ups from 1990 to 2002, we show that collective sense-making in the wake of such vital events can result in consensus behavior among entrepreneurs. Market search is a critical part of the entrepreneurial process, as entrepreneurs frequently enter new markets to find high-growth areas. When spectacular financings result in a collective overstatement of the attractiveness of a market, a consensus emerges that the market is resource-rich, and the path is cleared for many entries, including those that do not have a clear fit. When notorious failures render a market unpopular, only the most viable entrants will overcome exaggerated skepticism and enter, taking the non-consensus route. Venture capitalists likewise exhibit herding behavior, following other VCs into hot markets. We theorize that vital events effectively change the selection threshold for market entries, which changes the average viability of new entrants. We find that consensus entrants are less viable, while non-consensus entrants are more likely to prosper. Non-consensus entrepreneurs who buck the trends are most likely to stay in the market, receive funding, and ultimately go public.
AldrichH.2011An Evolutionary Approach to Entrepreneurship: Selected Essays. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
2.
AldrichH.FiolM.1994 “Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation.” Academy of Management Review, 19: 645–670.
3.
AldrichH. E.MartinezM.2015 “Why aren’t entrepreneurs more creative? Conditions affecting creativity and innovation in entrepreneurial activity.” In ShalleyC.HittM.ZhouJ. (eds.), Oxford Handbook on Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship: 445–456. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
AldrichH. E.RuefM.2006Organizational Evolution and Entrepreneurship, 2d ed.London: Sage.
BarnettW. P.SwansonA. N.SorensonO.2003 “Asymmetric selection among organizations.” Industrial and Corporate Change, 12: 673–695.
7.
BaumeisterR.BratslavskyE.VohsK.2001 “Bad is stronger than good.” Review of General Psychology, 5: 323–370.
8.
BaumolW. J.1996 “Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive.” Journal of Business Venturing, 11: 3–22.
9.
BikhchandaniS.HirshleiferD.WelchI.1998 “Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12: 151–170.
10.
BlankS.2013The Four Steps to the Epiphany: Successful Strategies for Products That Win. K&S Ranch.
11.
BurtR.1987 “Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence.” American Journal of Sociology, 92: 1287–1335.
12.
CamererC. F.LovalloD.1999 “Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach.” American Economic Review, 89: 306–318.
13.
CarrollG. R.HannanM. T.1989 “Density delay in the evolution of organizational populations: A model and five empirical tests.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 411–430.
14.
CarrollG. R.HannanM. T.2000The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
DavisG.1991 “Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 583–613.
16.
DelacroixJ.CarrollG. R.1983 “Organizational foundings: An ecological study of the newspaper industries of Argentina and Ireland.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 274–291.
17.
DenrellJ.MarchJ. G.2001 “Adaption as information restriction: The hot stove effect.” Organization Science, 12: 523–538.
18.
DosiG.LovalloD.1997 “Rational entrepreneurs or optimistic martyrs? Some considerations on technological regimes, corporate entries, and the evolutionary role of decision biases.” In GarudR.NayyarP. R.ShapiraZ. (eds.), Technological Innovation: Oversights and Foresights: 41–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
EvansD. S.JovanovicB.1989 “An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints.” Journal of Political Economy, 97: 808–827.
20.
FestingerL.1954 “A theory of social comparison processes.” Human Relations, 7: 117–140.
21.
GompersP. A.LernerJ.2001The Money of Invention: How Venture Capital Creates New Wealth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
22.
GreveH. R.1996 “Patterns of competition: The diffusion of a market position in radio broadcasting.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 29–60.
23.
HallB.JaffeA.TrajtenbergM.2001 “The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights, and methodological tools.” In NBER Working Paper Series. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
24.
HannanM. T.FreemanJ.1989Organizational Ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
25.
HannanM. T.PólosL.CarrollG. R.2007Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes and Ecologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
HarrisR. S.JenkinsonT.KaplanS. N.2014 “Private equity performance: What do we know?” Journal of Finance, 69: 1851–1882.
27.
HirschP. M.1972 “Processing fads and fashions: An organization-set analysis of cultural industry systems.” American Journal of Sociology, 77: 639–659.
28.
HobergG.PhillipsG.2010 “Product market synergies and competition in mergers and acquisitions: A text-based analysis.” Review of Financial Studies, 23: 3773–3811.
29.
HobergG.PhillipsG.2016 “Text-based network industries and endogenous product differentiation.” Journal of Political Economy (forthcoming), published online ahead of print. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1520062.
30.
JanisI. L.1982Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
31.
JonssonS.GreveH. R.Fujiwara-GreveT.2009 “Undeserved loss: The spread of legitimacy loss to innocent organizations in response to reported corporate deviance.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 54: 195–228.
32.
JovanovicB.2009 “Investment options and the business cycle.” Journal of Economic Theory, 144: 2247–2265.
33.
KahnemanD.2011Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
34.
KaplanS. N.SensoyB. A.StrömbergP.2009 “Should investors bet on the jockey or the horse? Evidence from the evolution of firms from early business plans to public companies.” Journal of Finance, 64: 75–115.
35.
KennedyM. T.2008 “Getting counted: Markets, media and reality.” American Sociological Review, 73: 270–295.
36.
KlepperS.2007 “Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of Detroit as the capital of the U.S. automobile industry.” Management Science, 53: 616–631.
37.
KondratieffN. D.1935 “The long waves in economic life.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 17: 109–115.
38.
KovácsB.HannanM. T.2010 “The consequences of category spanning depend on contrast.” In HsuG.NegroG.KocakO. (eds.), Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution: 175–201. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
39.
LazearE. P.2010Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
LeeP. M.PollockT. G.JinK.2011 “The contingent value of venture capitalist reputation.” Strategic Organization, 9: 33–69.
41.
LevinthalD.MarchJ. G.1981 “A model of adaptive organizational search.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2: 307–333.
42.
LevinthalD.MarchJ. G.1993 “The myopia of learning.” Strategic Management Journal, 14: 95–112.
43.
LewisM.2000The New New Thing: A Silicon Valley Story. New York: W.W. Norton.
44.
LincolnJ. R.1984 “Analyzing relations in dyads: Problems, models, and an application to interorganizational research.” Sociological Methods and Research, 13: 45–76.
45.
LounsburyM.GlynnM. A.2001 “Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources.” Strategic Management Journal, 22: 545–564.
46.
MacMillanI. C.SiegelR.NarasimhaP. N.1985 “Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals.” Journal of Business Venturing, 1: 119–128.
47.
MarksH. S.1993 “The value of predictions, or where’d all this rain come from?” Financial Analysis Journal, 49: 6–8.
48.
MartensM. L.JenningsJ. E.JenningsP. D.2007 “Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition.” Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1107–1132.
49.
MillerD. T.MorrisonK. R.2009 “Expressing deviant opinions: Believing you are in the majority helps.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45: 740–747.
50.
MinerA. S.HaunschildP. R.1995 “Population level learning.” In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 17: 115–166. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
51.
MizruchiM. S.1989 “Similarity of political behavior among large American corporations.” American Journal of Sociology, 95: 401–424.
52.
NandaR.Rhodes-KropfM.2013 “Investment cycles and startup innovation.” Journal of Financial Economics, 110: 403–418.
53.
NegroG.HannanM. T.RaoH.2010 “Categorical contrast and audience appeal: Niche width and critical success in winemaking.” Industrial and Corporate Change, 19: 1397–1425.
54.
OnoratoN.1997Trends in Venture Capital Funding in the 1990s. Washington, DC: U.S. Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy.
55.
PolanyiK.1944The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. New York: Rinehart.
56.
PollockN.WilliamsR.2009 “The sociology of a market analysis tool: How industry analysts sort vendors and organize markets.” Information and Organization, 19: 129–151.
57.
PollockN.WilliamsR.2011 “Who decides the shape of product markets? The knowledge institutions that name and categorise new technologies.” Information and Organization, 21: 194–217.
58.
PontikesE. G.2012 “Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audience evaluations.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 57: 81–118.
59.
PontikesE. G.BarnettW. P.2015 “The persistence of lenient market categories.” Organization Science, 26: 1415–1431.
60.
PontikesE. G.HannanM. T.2014 “An ecology of social categories.” Sociological Science, 1: 311–343.
61.
PontikesE.NegroG.RaoH.2010 “Stained red: A study of stigma by association to blacklisted artists during the ‘red scare’ in Hollywood, 1945 to 1960.” American Sociological Review, 75: 456–478.
62.
PoracJ. F.ThomasH.1990 “Taxonomic mental models in competitor definition.” Academy of Management Review, 15: 224–240.
63.
PowellW. W.PackalenK.WhittingtonK.2012 “Organizational and institutional genesis.” In PowellW. W.PadgetJ. (eds.), The Emergence of Organizations and Markets: 434–465. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
64.
RaoH.1994 “The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912.” Strategic Management Journal, 15: 29–44.
65.
RaoH.GreveH. R.DavisG. F.2001 “Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 502–526.
66.
RiesE.2011The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. New York: Crown Business.
67.
RuefM.2006 “Boom and bust: The effect of entrepreneurial inertia on organizational populations.” In BaumJ. A. C.DobrevS. D.Van WitteloostuijnA. (eds.), Advances in Strategic Management, 23: 29–72. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
68.
RuefM.2010The Entrepreneurial Group: Social Identities, Relations, and Collective Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69.
SantosF. M.EisenhardtK. M.2009 “Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields.” Academy of Management Journal, 52: 643–671.
70.
ScharfsteinD. S.SteinJ. C.1990 “Herd behavior and investment.” American Economic Review, 80: 465–479.
71.
SchumpeterJ.1934The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72.
SchumpeterJ.1939Business Cycles. York, PA: The Maple Press Company.
73.
ShaneS.CableD.2002 “Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures.” Management Science, 48: 364–381.
74.
SineW. D.DavidR. J.2010 “Institutions and entrepreneurship.” In SineW. D.DavidR. J. (eds.), Research in the Sociology of Work, 21: 1–26. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
75.
SoltesE.2009 “News dissemination and the impact of the business press.” Unpublished dissertation, University of Chicago Booth School of Business.
76.
SørensenJ. B.2007 “Bureaucracy and entrepreneurship: Workplace effects on entrepreneurial entry.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 387–412.
77.
SorensonO.StuartT.2008 “Bringing the context back in: Settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investment networks.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 266–294.
78.
StrangD.MacyM.2001 “In search of excellence: Fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation.” American Journal of Sociology, 107: 147–183.
79.
StrangD.SouleS. A.1998 “Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills.” Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 265–290.
80.
StuartT. E.SorensonO.2005 “Social networks and entrepreneurship.” In AlvarezS. A.AgarwalR.SorensonO. (eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: 233–252. New York: Springer.
81.
SujanM.1985 “Consumer knowledge: Effects on evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments.” Journal of Consumer Research, 12: 31–46.
82.
SuttonR. I.CallahanA. L.1987 “The stigma of bankruptcy: Spoiled organizational image and its management.” Academy of Management Journal, 30: 405–436.
83.
SwaminathanA.1996 “Environmental conditions at founding and organizational mortality: A trial-by-fire model.” Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1350–1377.
84.
TheilP.2014Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future. New York: Crown Business.
85.
TyebjeeT.BrunoA.1984 “A model of venture capitalist investment activity.” Management Science, 30: 1051–1066.
VenkataramanS.1997 “The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research.” In KatzJ. A.BrockhausR. H. (eds.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 3: 119–138. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
88.
WangP.2009 “Popular concepts beyond organizations: Exploring new dimensions of information technology innovations.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10: 1–30.
89.
WangP.2010 “Chasing the hottest IT: Effects of information technology fashion on organizations.” MIS Quarterly, 34: 63–85.
90.
WeickK.1979The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2d ed.Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
91.
WhiteH.1981 “Where do markets come from?” American Journal of Sociology, 87: 517–547.
92.
YueL. Q.2012 “Asymmetric effects of fashions on the formation and dissolution of networks: Board interlocks with Internet companies, 1996–2006.” Organization Science, 23: 1114–1134.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
