We examine how chief executive officer (CEO) narcissism influences the interorganizational imitation of corporate strategy. We theorize that narcissistic CEOs are influenced more by the corporate strategies they experienced on other boards and less by the corporate strategies experienced by other directors. These effects are strengthened if the other firms to which the CEO has interlock ties have high status and if the CEO is powerful. Through longitudinal analyses of Fortune 500 companies’ decisions (from 1997 to 2006) related to the acquisition emphasis of a firm’s growth strategy and the firm’s level of international diversification, we show that narcissistic CEOs are influenced by corporate strategies that they witnessed at other firms much more than other CEOs. In addition, relatively narcissistic CEOs not only strongly resist the influence of other directors’ prior experience but also tend to demonstrate their superiority by adopting corporate strategies that are the opposite of what fellow directors’ prior experience would suggest. Our theory and results highlight how CEO narcissism limits directors’ influence over corporate strategy and influences CEOs’ learning and information processing in making strategic decisions.
AmesD. R.RoseP.AndersonC. P.2006 “The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism.” Journal of Research in Personality, 40: 440–450.
2.
AnsariS. M.FissP. C.ZajacE. J.2010 “Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse.” Academy of Management Review, 35: 67–92.
3.
BalkundiP.KilduffM.HarrisonD. A.2011 “Centrality and charisma: Comparing how leader networks and attributions affect team performance.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 1209–1222.
4.
BeckmanC. M.HaunschildP. R.2002 “Network learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 92–124.
5.
BoekerW.1997 “Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top manager movement on product-market entry.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 213–236.
6.
BriscoeF.MurphyC.2012 “Sleight of hand? Practice opacity, third-party responses, and the interorganizatinoal diffusion of controversial practices.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 57: 553–584.
7.
BuckleyP. J.CassonM. C.1998 “Analyzing foreign market entry strategies: Extending the internalization approach.” Journal of International Business Studies, 29: 539–561.
8.
BurtR. S.1987 “Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence.” American Journal of Sociology, 92: 1287–1335.
9.
CampbellW. K.1999 “Narcissism and romantic attraction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77: 1254–1270.
10.
CampbellW. K.MillerJ. D.2011The Handbook of Narcissism and Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Theoretical Approaches, Empirical Findings, and Treatments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
11.
CarlsonE. N.VazireS.OltmannsT. F.2011 “You probably think this paper’s about you: Narcissists’ perceptions of their personality and reputation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101: 185–201.
12.
CarpenterM. A.GeletkanyczM. A.SandersW. G.2004 “Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition.” Journal of Management, 30: 749–778.
13.
ChatterjeeA.HambrickD. C.2007 “It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 351–386.
14.
ChatterjeeA.HambrickD. C.2011 “Executive personality, capability cues, and risk taking: How narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 56: 202–237.
15.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S.2003Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
ConnellyB. L.JohnsonJ. L.TihanyiL.EllstrandA. E.2011 “More than adopters: Competing influences in the interlocking directorate.” Organization Science, 22: 688–703.
17.
CrosslandC.HambrickD. C.2007 “How national systems differ in their constraints on corporate executives: A study of CEO effects in three countries.” Strategic Management Journal, 28: 767–789.
18.
CrosslandC.HambrickD. C.2011 “Differences in managerial discretion across countries: How nation-level institutions affect the degree to which CEOs matter.” Strategic Management Journal, 32: 797–819.
19.
CycyotaC. S.HarrisonD. A.2002 “Enhancing survey response rates at the executive level: Are employee- or consumer-level techniques effective?” Journal of Management, 28: 151–176.
20.
CyertR.MarchJ. G.1963A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. New York: Wiley.
21.
DavisG. F.1991 “Agents without principles: The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 583–613.
22.
DavisG. F.GreveH. R.1997 “Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s.” American Journal of Sociology, 103: 1–37.
23.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W.1983 “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.” American Sociological Review, 48: 147–160.
24.
FarwellL.Wohlwend-LloydR.1998 “Narcissistic processes: Optimistic expectations, favorable self-evaluations, and self-enhancing attributions.” Journal of Personality, 66: 65–83.
25.
FinkelsteinS.1992 “Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation.” Academy of Management Journal, 35: 505–538.
26.
FinkelsteinS.HambrickD. C.CannellaA. A.Jr.2009Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
FissP. C.KennedyM. T.DavisG. F.2012 “How golden parachutes unfolded: Diffusion and variation of a controversial practice.” Organization Science, 23: 1077–1099.
28.
FissP. C.ZajacE. J.2004 “The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 501–534.
29.
FosterJ. D.CampbellW. K.2007 “Are there such things as ‘narcissists’ in social psychology? A taxometric analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory.” Personality and Individual Differences, 43: 1321–1332.
FredricksonJ. W.MitchellT. R.1984 “Strategic decision processes: Comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment.” Academy of Management Journal, 27: 399–423.
32.
FreudS.1957 “On narcissism: An introduction.” In StracheyJ. (ed.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud: 67–104. London: Hogarth Press
33.
GabrielM. T.CritelliJ. W.EeJ. S.1994 “Narcissistic illusions in self-evaluations of intelligence and attractiveness.” Journal of Personality, 62: 143–155.
34.
GalaskiewiczJ.WassermanS.1989 “Mimetic processes within an interorganizational field: An empirical test.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 454–479.
35.
GeletkanyczM. A.HambrickD. C.1997 “The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 654–681.
36.
GerstnerW.-C.KönigA.EndersA.HambrickD. C.2013 “CEO narcissism, audience engagement, and organizational adoption of technological discontinuities.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 257–291.
37.
GraffinS. D.WadeJ. B.PoracJ. F.McNameeR. C.2008 “The impact of CEO status diffusion on the economic outcomes of other senior managers.” Organization Science, 19: 457–474.
38.
GreeneG.2011Econometric Analysis, 7th ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39.
GreveH. R.2012 “Fast and expensive: The diffusion of a disappointing innovation.” Strategic Management Journal, 32: 949–968.
40.
HambrickD. C.AbrahamsonE.1995 “Assessing managerial discretion across industries: A multimethod approach.” Academy of Management Journal, 38: 1427–1441.
41.
HambrickD. C.FinkelsteinS.1987 “Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes.” In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 9: 369–406. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
42.
HaunschildP. R.1993 “Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 564–592.
43.
HaunschildP. R.BeckmanC. M.1998 “When do interlocks matter? Alternate sources of information and interlock influence.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 815–844.
44.
HeckmanJ. J.1979 “Sample selection bias as a specification error.” Econometrica, 47: 153–161.
45.
HillmanA. J.DalzielT.2003 “Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives.” Academy of Management Review, 28: 383–396.
46.
HittM. A.HoskissonR. E.KimH.1997 “International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms.” Academy of Management Journal, 40: 767–798.
47.
HittM. A.TihanyiL.MillerT.ConnellyB.2006 “International diversification: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators.” Journal of Management, 32: 831–867.
48.
HoetkerG.2007 “The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues.” Strategic Management Journal, 28: 331–343.
49.
JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.1994 “Accuracy and bias in self-perception: Individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66: 206–219.
50.
JudgeT. A.LePineJ. A.RichB. L.2006 “Loving yourself abundantly: Relationship of the narcissistic personality to self- and other perceptions of workplace deviance, leadership, and task and contextual performance.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 762–776.
51.
KariyaT.KurataH.2004Generalized Least Squares. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
52.
KhuranaR.2002Searching for a Corporate Savior: The Irrational Quest for Charismatic CEOs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
KilduffM.1992 “The friendship network as a decision-making resource: Dispositional moderators of social influences on organizational choice.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62: 168–180.
54.
KimJ. Y.HaleblianJ.FinkelsteinS.2011 “When firms are desperate to grow via acquisition: The effect of growth patterns and acquisition experience on acquisition premiums.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 56: 26–60.
55.
KraatzM. S.1998 “Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change.” Academy of Management Journal, 41: 621–643.
56.
LevittB.MarchJ. G.1988 “Organizational learning.” Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 319–340.
57.
LiJ. T.TangY.2010 “CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion.” Academy of Management Journal, 53: 45–68.
58.
LinckJ. S.NetterJ. M.YangT.2008 “The determinants of board structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 87: 308–328.
59.
LorschJ. W.MacIverE.1989Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America’s Corporate Boards. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
60.
McDonaldM. L.WestphalJ. D.2003 “Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs’ advice networks and firms’ strategic responses to poor performance.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 1–32.
61.
McDonaldM. L.WestphalJ. D.GraebnerM. E.2008 “What do they know? The effects of outside director acquisition experience on firm acquisition performance.” Strategic Management Journal, 29: 1155–1177.
62.
MizruchiM. S.1996 “What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates.” Annual Review of Sociology, 22: 271–298.
63.
MorfC. C.RhodewaltF.2001 “Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model.” Psychological Inquiry, 12: 177–196.
64.
NevickaB.Ten VeldenF.De HooghA.Van VianenA.2011 “Reality at odds with perceptions: Narcissistic leaders and group performance.” Psychological Science, 22: 1259–1264.
65.
OhH.KilduffM.2008 “The ripple effect of personality on social structure: Self-monitoring origins of network brokerage.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 1155–1164.
66.
OltmannsT. F.FriedmanJ. N. W.FiedlerE. R.TurkheimerE.2004 “Perceptions of people with personality disorders based on thin slices of behavior.” Journal of Research in Personality, 38: 216–229.
PalmerD. A.JenningsP. D.ZhouX. G.1993 “Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large U.S. corporations: Institutional, political, and economic accounts.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 100–131.
69.
PaulhusD. L.1998 “Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 1197–1208.
70.
PaulhusD. L.WilliamsK. M.2002 “The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy.” Journal of Research in Personality, 36: 556–563.
PiazzaA.CastellucciF.2014 “Status in organization and management theory.” Journal of Management, 40: 287–315.
73.
PodolnyJ. M.PhillipsD.1996 “The dynamics of organizational status.” Industry and Corporate Change, 5: 453–471.
74.
PollockT. G.FischerH. M.WadeJ. B.2002 “The role of power and politics in the repricing of executive options.” Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1172–1182.
75.
PoracJ. F.WadeJ. B.PollockT. G.1999 “Industry categories and the politics of the comparable firm in CEO compensation.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 112–144.
76.
RaoH.SivakumarK.1999 “Institutional sources of boundary-spanning structures: The establishment of investor relations departments in the Fortune 500 industrials.” Organization Science, 10: 27–42.
77.
RaskinR.ShawR.1988 “Narcissism and the use of personal pronouns.” Journal of Personality, 56: 393–404.
78.
RaskinR.TerryH.1988 “A principal components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54: 890–902.
79.
ResickC. J.WhitmanD. S.WeingardenS. A.HillerN. J.2009 “The bright-side and the dark-side of CEO personality: Examining core self-evaluations, narcissism, transformational leadership, and strategic influence.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 1365–1381.
80.
RhodesN.WoodW.1992 “Self-esteem and intelligence affect influenceability: The mediating role of message reception.” Psychological Bulletin, 111: 156–171.
81.
RhodewaltF.MorfC. C.1998 “On self-aggrandizement and anger: A temporal analysis of narcissism and affective reactions to success and failure.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 672–685.
SandersW. G.TuschkeA.2007 “The adoption of institutionally contested organizational practices: The emergence of stock option pay in Germany.” Academy of Management Journal, 50: 33–56.
84.
ShenW.2003 “The dynamics of the CEO-board relationship: An evolutionary perspective.” Academy of Management Review, 28: 466–476.
85.
ShipilovA. V.LiS. X.GreveH. R.2011 “The prince and the pauper: Search and brokerage in the initiation of status-heterophilous ties.” Organization Science, 22: 1418–1434.
86.
ShropshireC.2010 “The role of the interlocking director and board receptivity in the diffusion of practices.” Academy of Management Review, 35: 246–264.
87.
StuartT. E.HoangH.HybelsR. C.1999 “Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 315–349.
88.
TallmanS.LiJ.1996 “Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms.” Academy of Management Journal, 39: 179–196.
89.
TolbertP. S.ZuckerL. G.1983 “Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 22–39.
90.
UseemM.1984The Inner Circle. New York: Oxford University Press.
91.
UzziB.1997 “Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 35–67.
92.
WadeJ.O’ReillyC. A.ChandratatI.1990 “Golden parachutes: CEOs and the exercise of social influence.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 587–603.
93.
WallaceH. M.BaumeisterR. F.2002 “The performance of narcissists rises and falls with perceived opportunity for glory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82: 819–834.
94.
WestphalJ. D.1999 “Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties.” Academy of Management Journal, 42: 7–24.
95.
WestphalJ. D.BednarM. K.2008 “The pacification of institutional investors.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 29–72.
96.
WestphalJ. D.KhannaP.2003 “Keeping directors in line: Social distancing as a control mechanism in the corporate elite.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 361–398.
WestphalJ. D.ZajacE. J.1995 “Who shall govern: CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 60–83.
99.
WestphalJ. D.ZajacE. J.1997 “Defections from the inner circle: Social exchange, reciprocity, and the diffusion of board independence in U.S. corporations.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 161–183.
100.
WestphalJ. D.ZajacE. J.2013 “A behavioral theory of corporate governance: Explicating the mechanisms of socially situated and socially constituted agency.” Academy of Management Annals, 7: 605–659.
WiersemaM. F.BowenH. P.2009 “The use of limited dependent variable techniques in strategy research: Issues and methods.” Strategic Management Journal, 30: 679–692.
103.
ZajacE. J.WestphalJ. D.1996 “Who shall succeed? How CEO board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs.” Academy of Management Journal, 39: 64–90.
104.
ZhouJ.ShinS. J.BrassD. J.ChoiJ.ZhangZ. X.2009 “Social networks, personal values, and creativity: Evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 1544–1552.
105.
ZhuD. H.2013 “Group polarization on corporate boards: Theory and evidence on board decisions about acquisition premiums.” Strategic Management Journal, 34: 800–822.
