In this study of the impact of protests against Walmart (a first entrant) on Target (a second entrant) from 1998 to 2008 in U.S. geographic markets, we develop and test a theory of information spillovers from protests against corporations proposing to enter a new market. We argue that the number of protests directed against a first entrant is a noisy signal for the second entrant because such protests are likely to be dominated by protest-prone activists and so do not reflect the sentiments of the community. The second entrant is likely to discount protests against the first entrant that are led by protest-prone activists and rely instead on protests led by local, decentralized activists as indicative of a community’s preferences. We argue that the second entrant differentiates between protests against the first-entrant firm and the organizational form, and discounts protests against a specific firm but not those against the form (e.g., big-box stores). Further, the second entrant is likely to rely on the reaction of the first entrant as an indication of the meaning of the protest. Finally, all of these signaling effects will be stronger in markets in which the second entrant has no experience and so lacks local knowledge. The study provides broad support for our arguments.
AbrahamsonE.RosenkopfL.1993 “Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion”. Academy of Management Review, 18: 487–517.
2.
AgarwalR.GortM.1996 “The evolution of markets and entry, exit, and survival of firms”. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78: 489–498.
3.
AiC.NortonE. C.2003 “Interaction terms in logit and probit models”. Economics Letters, 80: 123–129.
4.
BanduraA.1977Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press.
5.
BanerjeeA.1992 “A simple model of herd behavior”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107: 797–817.
6.
BaronD. P.DiermeierD.2007 “Strategic activism and nonmarket strategy”. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16: 599–634.
7.
BenfordR. D.SnowD. A.2000 “Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment”. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 611–639.
8.
BergI.ZaldM. N.1978 “Business and society”. Annual Review of Sociology, 4: 115–143.
ConellC.CohnS.1995 “Learning from other people’s actions: Environmental variation and diffusion in French coal mining strikes”. American Journal of Sociology, 101: 366–403.
11.
CongletonR.2003 “The median voter model”; In RowleyC. K.SchneiderF. (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Public Choice: 382–386. New York: Kluwer Academic.
12.
DamarH.-E.2009 “Why do payday lenders enter local markets? Evidence from Oregon”. Review of Industrial Organization, 34: 173–191.
13.
DavidsonS. M.RummelA.2000 “Retail changes associated with Wal-Mart’s entry into Maine”. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 28: 162–169.
14.
DavisG. F.McAdamD.ScottW. R.ZaldM. N.2005Social Movements and Organization Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
DenrellJ.2003 “Vicarious learning, under-sampling of failure, and the myths of management”. Organization Science, 14: 227–243.
16.
DownsA.1957An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
17.
EichhornR.1998 “Target to openJuly26.” Dayton Daily News, July9: Z4–1.
18.
FeinbergR.2008 “Explaining the credit union entry decision, and implications for performance”. Review of Industrial Organization, 33: 81–91.
19.
GolderP. N.TellisG. J.1993 “Pioneer advantage: Marketing logic or marketing legend?” Journal of Marketing Research, 30: 158–170.
20.
GreeneW. H.2010 “Testing hypotheses about interaction terms in nonlinear models”. Economics Letters, 107: 291–296.
21.
GreeneW. H.2011Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22.
GreveH. R.RaoH.2012 “Echoes of the past: Organizational foundings as sources of an institutional legacy of mutualism”. American Journal of Sociology, 118: 635–675.
23.
HaunschildP. R.MinerA. S.1997 “Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 472–500.
24.
HavemanH. A.RaoH.ParuchuriS.2007 “The winds of change: The progressive movement and the bureaucratization of thrift”. American Sociological Review, 72: 114–142.
25.
HoetkerG.2007 “The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues”. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 331–343.
26.
HolmesT. J.2011 “The diffusion of Walmart and economies of density”. Econometrica, 79: 253–302.
27.
IngramP.YueL. Q.RaoH.2010 “Trouble in store: Probes, protests, and store openings by Walmart, 1998–2007”. American Journal of Sociology, 116: 53–92.
28.
JiaP.2008 “What happens when Wal-Mart comes to town: An empirical analysis of the discount retailing industry”. Econometrica, 76: 1263–1316.
29.
JonssonS.GreveH. R.Fujiwara-GreveT.2009 “Undeserved loss: The spread of legitimacy loss to innocent organizations in response to reported corporate deviance”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54: 195–228.
30.
Karaca-MandicP.NortonE. C.DowdB.2012 “Interaction terms in nonlinear models”. Health Services Research, 47: 255–274.
31.
KashyapV.AntiaK. D.FrazierG. L.2012 “Contracts, extracontractual incentives, and ex post behavior in franchise channel relationships”. Journal of Marketing Research, 49: 260–276.
32.
KimJ.-Y. J.MinerA. S.2007 “Vicarious learning from the failure and near-failure of others: Evidence from the U.S. commercial banking industry”. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 687–714.
33.
KingB. G.2008 “A political model of corporate response to social movement activism”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 395–421.
34.
KingB. G.PearceN. A.2010 “The contentiousness of markets: Politics, social movements, and institutional change in markets”. Annual Review of Sociology, 36: 249–267.
35.
KingB. G.SouleS. A.2007 “Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 413–442.
36.
LevittB.MarchJ. G.1988 “Organizational learning”. Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 319–338.
37.
LevyM.BakerA.2004 “Wal-Mart sex-bias case wins class-action status: Growing legal troubles pose an image problem”. Minneapolis Star Tribune, Metro Edition, June23: 1D.
38.
LichbachM. I.1998 “Contending theories of contentious politics and the structure-action problem of social order”. Annual Review of Political Science, 1: 401–424.
39.
LichstensteinN.2009Wal-Mart: The Face of Twenty First Century Capitalism. New York: Academic Press.
LipskyM.1970Protest in City Politics: Rent Strikes, Housing, and the Power of the Poor. Chicago: Rand McNally.
42.
LohmannS.1993 “A signaling model of informative and manipulative political action”. American Political Science Review, 87: 319–333.
43.
MinS.KalwaniM. U.RobinsonW. T.2006 “Market pioneer and early follower survival risks: A contingency analysis of really new versus incrementally new product-markets”. Journal of Marketing Research, 70: 15–33.
44.
NieN. H.VerbaD.1975 “Political participation”. In GreensteinF. I.PolsbyN. W. (eds.), Handbook of Political Science: 1–74. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
45.
OlsonM.1965Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
PontikesE.NegroG.RaoH.2011 “Stained red: A study of stigma by association to blacklisted artists during the ‘Red Scare’ in Hollywood, 1945 to 1960.” American Sociological Review, 75: 456–478.
47.
PoracJ. F.ThomasH.WilsonF.PatonD.KanferA.1995 “Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 203–227.
48.
RaoH.GreveH. R.DavisG. F.2001 “Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 502–526.
49.
RaoH.YueL. Q.IngramP.2011 “Laws of attraction: Regulatory arbitrage in the face of activism in right-to-work states”. American Sociological Review, 76: 365–385.
50.
ReidE. M.ToffelM. W.2009 “Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies”. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 1157–1178.
51.
RoodmanD.2011 “Fitting fully observed recursive mixed-process models with CMP”. Stata Journal, 11: 159–206.
52.
RozinP.RoyzmanE. B.2001 “Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion”. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5: 296–320.
53.
SerresC.2005 “Teflon Target”. Minneapolis Star Tribune, May22: 1D.
54.
ShenQ.XiaoP.2011 “McDonald’s and KFC in China: Competitors or companions.” Working paper, Department of Marketing, Wharton School of Business.
StrangD.MacyM. W.2001 “In search of excellence: Fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation”. American Journal of Sociology, 107: 147–182.
57.
ThorntonD.GunninghamN. A.2005 “General deterrence and corporate environmental behavior”. Law and Policy, 27: 262–288.
58.
TillyC.1998 “From interactions to outcomes in social movements.” In GiugniM.. (eds.), How Social Movements Matter: 253–271. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
59.
ToivanenO.WatersonM.2005 “Market structure and entry: Where’s the beef?” RAND Journal of Economics, 36: 680–699.
60.
VerbaS.BrodyR. A.1970 “Participation, preferences, and the War in Vietnam”. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34: 325–332.
61.
VitorinoM. A.2012 “Empirical entry games with complementarities: An application to the shopping center industry”. Journal of Marketing Research, 49: 175–191.
62.
WalkerE. T.MartinA. W.McCarthyJ. D.2008 “Confronting the state, the corporation, and the academy: The influence of institutional targets on social movement repertoires.” American Journal of Sociology, 114: 35–76.
63.
WeberK.RaoH.ThomasL. G.2009 “From streets to suites: How the anti-biotech movement affected German pharmaceutical firms”. American Sociological Review, 74: 106–127.
64.
WhiteH. C.1981 “Where do markets come from?” American Journal of Sociology, 87: 517–547.
65.
WiersemaM. F.BowenH. P.2009 “The use of limited dependent variable techniques in strategy research: Issues and methods”. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 679–692.
66.
YangN.2013 “March of the chains: Herding in restaurant locations”. NET Institute Working Paper No. 11–16.
67.
YueL. Q.2012 “Asymmetric effects of fashions on the formation and dissolution of networks: Board interlocks with Internet companies, 1996–2006”. Organization Science, 23: 1114–1134.
68.
YueL. Q.LuoJ.IngramP.2013 “The failure of private regulation: Elite control and market crises in the Manhattan banking industry”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 37–68.
69.
ZhuT.SinghV.ManuszakM.2009 “Market structure and competition in the retail discount industry”. Journal of Marketing Research, 46: 453–466.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
