We examine the responses of major pharmaceutical firms to the advent of biotechnology over the period 1980 to 2008 to explain why established firms vary in their adoption of technological discontinuities. Combining insights from upper echelons theory, personality theory, and research on organizational responses to new technologies, we posit that narcissistic chief executive officers (CEOs) of established firms will be relatively aggressive in their adoption of technological discontinuities. We propose, however, that the effect of a CEO’s narcissism on organizational outcomes will be moderated by audience engagement—the degree to which observers view a phenomenon as noteworthy and provocative—which varies over time. When audience engagement is high, narcissistic CEOs will anticipate widespread admiration for their bold actions and thus will invest especially aggressively in a discontinuous technology. Drawing from work on managerial cognition, we further hypothesize that CEOs’ narcissism will influence their top managers’ attention to a discontinuous technology, an association that will also be moderated by audience engagement. Finally, we suggest that managerial attention to the discontinuous technology will subsequently be reflected in company investments in the new technological domain. Results provide considerable support for our hypotheses and highlight the role of narcissism in the context of radical organizational change, the influence of audience engagement on executive behavior, and the effect of executive personality on managerial attention.
AbernathyW.ClarkK.1985“Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction.”Research Policy, 14: 3–22.
2.
AhujaG.LampertC. M.TandonV.2008“Moving beyond Schumpeter: Management research on the determinants of technological innovation.”Academy of Management Annals, 2: 1–98.
AnandJ.OrianiR.VassoloR. S.2010“Alliance activity as a dynamic capability in the face of a discontinuous technological change.”Organization Science, 21: 1213–1232.
5.
AndersonP.TushmanM. L.1990“Technological discontinuities and dominant design: A cyclical model of technological change.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 604–633.
6.
AudiaP. G.GreveH. R.2006“Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry.”Management Science, 52: 83–94.
7.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A.1986“The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173–1182.
8.
BennerM. J.2007“The incumbent discount: Stock market categories and response to radical technological change.”Academy of Management Review, 32: 703–720.
9.
BennerM. J.2010“Securities analysts and incumbent response to radical technological change: Evidence from digital photography and internet telephony.”Organization Science, 21: 42–62.
10.
BertrandM.SchoarA.2003“Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118: 1169–1208.
11.
BogartL. M.BenotschE. G.PavlovicJ. D.2004“Feeling superior but threatened: The relationship of narcissism to social comparison.”Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26: 35–44.
12.
BowerJ.1970Managing the Resource Allocation Process. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
13.
BouquetC.BirkinshawJ.2008“Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries can gain attention from corporate headquarters.”Academy of Management Journal, 51: 577–601.
14.
BrownT. A.2006Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York: Guilford Press.
15.
BuffardiL. E.CampbellW. K.2008“Narcissism and social networking websites.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34: 1303–1314.
16.
BurgelmanR. A.1983“A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 223–244.
17.
BurgelmanR. A.2002“Strategy as a vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 325–357.
18.
BussD. M.ChiodoL. M.1991“Narcissistic acts in everyday life.”Journal of Personality, 59: 179–215.
19.
CampbellK. W.GoodieA. S.FosterJ. D.2004“Narcissism, confidence, and risk attitude.”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17: 297–311.
20.
CarpenterM. A.GeletkanyczM. A.SandersG. M.2004“Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements and consequences of top management team composition.”Journal of Management, 30: 749–778.
21.
ChandyR. K.TellisG. J.1998“Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize.”Journal of Marketing Research, 35: 474–487.
22.
ChatterjeeA.HambrickD. C.2007“It’s all about me: Narcissistic CEOs and their effects on company strategy and performance.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 351–386.
23.
ChatterjeeA.HambrickD. C.2011“Executive personality, capability cues, and risk taking: How narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 56: 202–237.
24.
ChesbroughH.2001“Assembling the elephant: A review of empirical studies on the impact of technical change upon incumbent firms.” In ChesbroughH.BurgelmanR. A. (eds.), Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, 7: 1–36. Bingley, UK: Emerald Books.
25.
ChoT. S.HambrickD. C.2006“Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation.”Organization Science, 17: 453–469.
26.
ChristensenC. M.1997The Innovator's Dilemma. New York: Harper Business.
27.
ChristensenC. M.BowerJ. L.1996“Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms.”Strategic Management Journal, 17: 197–218.
28.
CockburnI.HendersonR. M.1994“Racing to invest? The dynamics of competition in ethical drug discovery.”Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 3: 481–519.
29.
CockburnI. M.HendersonR.SternS.2000“Untangling the origins of competitive advantage.”Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1123–1145.
30.
CyertR. M.MarchJ. G.1963A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31.
DelugaR. J.1997“Relationship among American presidential charismatic leadership, narcissism, and rated performance.”Leadership Quarterly, 8: 49–65.
32.
EggersJ. P.KaplanS.2009“Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change.”Organization Science, 20: 461–477.
33.
EllisH.1898“Auto-erotism: A psychological study.”Alienist and Neurologist, 19: 260–299.
34.
EmmonsR. A.1984“Factor analysis and construct validity of the narcissistic personality inventory.”Journal of Personality Assessment, 48: 291–300.
35.
EmmonsR. A.1987“Narcissism: Theory and measurement.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52: 11–17.
36.
FarwellL.Wohlwend-LloydR.1988“Narcissistic processes: Optimistic expectations, favorable self-evaluations, and self-enhancing attributions.”Journal of Personality, 66: 65–83.
37.
FinkelsteinS.1992“Power in top management teams: Dimension, measurement, and validation.”Academy of Management Journal, 35: 505–538.
38.
FreudS.1914Zur Einführung des Narziβmus. Leipzig: Internationaler Psycho-analytischer Verlag.
39.
GhemawatP.1991Commitment: The Dynamics of Strategy. New York: Free Press.
40.
GilbertC. G.2005“Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity.”Academy of Management Journal, 48: 741–763.
41.
GilbertR. J.NewberyD.1982“Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly.”American Economic Review, 72: 514–526.
42.
GoncaloJ. A.FlynnF. J.KimS. H.2010“Are two narcissists better than one? The link between narcissism, perceived creativity, and creative performance.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36: 1484–1495.
GreenleyG. E.OktemgilM.1998“A comparison of slack resources in high and low performing British companies.”Journal of Management Studies, 35: 377–398.
45.
GulerI.2007“Throwing good money after bad? Political and institutional influences on sequential decision making in the venture capital industry.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 248–285.
46.
HambrickD. C.2007“Upper echelons theory: An update.”Academy of Management Review, 32: 334–343.
47.
HambrickD. C.FinkelsteinS.1987“Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes.” In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 9: 369–406. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
48.
HambrickD. C.GeletkanyczM. A.FredricksonJ. W.1993“Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants.”Strategic Management Journal, 14: 401–418.
49.
HambrickD. C.MasonP. A.1984“Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers.”Academy of Management Review, 9: 193–206.
50.
HamiltonG.2005The Biotechnology Market Outlook: Growth Opportunities and Effective Strategies for Licensing and Collaboration. Dublin: Research and Markets.
51.
HannanM. T.FreemanJ.1984“Structural inertia and organizational change.”American Sociological Review, 49: 149–164.
52.
HausmanJ.1978“Specification tests in econometrics.”Econometrica, 46: 1251–1271.
53.
HeckmanJ.1979“Sample selection bias as a specification error.”Econometrica, 47: 153–161.
HilbeJ. M.2011Negative Binomial Regression, 2d ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56.
HillC. W.RothaermelF. T.2003“The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation.”Academy of Management Review, 28: 257–274.
57.
HoetkerG.2007“The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues.”Strategic Management Journal, 28: 331–343.
58.
HoffmanA. J.OcasioW.2001“Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events.”Organization Science, 12: 414–434.
59.
HsiaoC.2003Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
JosephJ.OcasioW.2012 “Architecture, attention, and adaptation in the multibusiness firm: General Electric from 1951 to 2001.”Strategic Management Journal, 33: 633–660.
61.
JudgeT. A.LePineJ.RichB. L.2006“Loving yourself abundantly: Relationship of the narcissistic personality to self and other perceptions of workplace deviance, leadership, and task and contextual performance.”Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 762–776.
62.
KaplanS.2008a“Cognition, capabilities and incentives: Assessing firm response to the fiber-optic revolution.”Academy of Management Journal, 51: 672–695.
63.
KaplanS.2008b“Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty.”Organization Science, 19: 729–752.
64.
KaplanS.2011“Research in cognition and strategy: Reflections on two decades of progress and a look to the future.”Journal of Management Studies, 48: 665–695.
65.
KaplanS.MurrayF.HendersonR.2003“Discontinuities and senior management: Assessing the role of recognition in pharmaceutical firm response to biotechnology.”Industrial and Corporate Change, 12: 203–233.
66.
KaplanS.TripsasM.2008“Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change.”Research Policy, 37: 790–805.
67.
KayJ.2010Obliquity. London: Profile Books.
68.
KernbergO. F.1975Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism. New York: Aronson.
69.
KernisM. H.2005“Measuring self-esteem in context: The importance of stability of self-esteem in psychological functioning.”Journal of Personality, 73: 1569–1605.
70.
KohutH.WolfE. S.1986“The disorders of the self and their treatment: An outline.” In MorrisonA. (ed.), Essential Papers on Narcissism: 175–196. New York: New York University Press.
71.
KrippendorffK.2004Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 2d ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72.
Leonard-BartonD.1992“Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development.”Strategic Management Journal, 13: 111–125.
73.
LivengoodR. S.RegerR. K.2010“That’s our turf! Identity domains and competitive dynamics.”Academy of Management Review, 35: 48–66.
74.
LubitR.2002“The long-term organizational impact of destructively narcissistic managers.”Academy of Management Executive, 16 (1): 127–138.
75.
MaccobyM.2003The Productive Narcissist: The Promise and Peril of Visionary Leadership. New York: Broadway Books.
76.
MarchJ. G.1991“Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.”Organization Science, 2: 71–87.
77.
MarchJ. G.SimonH. A.1958Organizations. New York: Wiley.
78.
MaulaM. V. J.KeilT.ZahraS. A.2012“Top management’s attention to discontinuous technological change: Corporate venture capital as an alert mechanism.”Organization Science, forthcoming, online in advancehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0775.
79.
MilesM.HubermanM.1994Qualitative Data Analysis, 2d ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
80.
MillerD.1993“The architecture of simplicity.”Academy of Management Review, 18: 116–138.
81.
MillerD.FriesenP.1980“Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation.”Academy of Management Journal, 23: 591–614.
82.
MischelW.1977“The interaction of person and situation.” In MagnussonD.EndlerN. S. (eds.), Personality at the Crossroads: Current Issues in Interactional Psychology: 333–352. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
83.
MitchellW.1989“Whether and why? Probability and timing of incumbents’ entry into emerging industrial subfields.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 208–230.
84.
MorfC. C.RhodewaltF.2001“Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model.”Psychological Inquiry, 12: 177–196.
85.
NadkarniS.HerrmannP.2010“CEO personality, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The case of the Indian business process outsourcing industry.”Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1050–1073.
86.
O’BrienA.2007“Caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors.”Quality and Quantity, 41: 673–690.
87.
OcasioW.1997“Towards an attention-based view of the firm.”Strategic Management Journal, 18: 187–206.
88.
OcasioW.2011“Attention to attention.”Organization Science, 22: 1286–1296.
89.
PetersonR. S.MartoranaP. V.SmithD. B.OwensP.2003“The impact of chief executive officer personality on top management team dynamics: One mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performance.”Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 795–808.
90.
PfefferJ.1992Managing with Power. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
91.
PincusA. L.RocheM. J.2011“Narcissistic grandiosity and narcissistic vulnerability.” In CampbellW. K.MillerJ. D. (eds.), The Handbook of Narcissism and Narcissistic Personality Disorder: 31–40. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
92.
PisanoG. P.2006Science Business: The Promise, the Reality, and the Future of Biotech. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
93.
PorterM. E.1987“From competitive advantage to corporate strategy.”Harvard Business Review, 65 (May–June): 43–59.
94.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F.1994“Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67: 741–763.
95.
RaskinR.1980“Narcissism and creativity: Are they related?” Psychological Reports, 46: 55–60.
RaskinR.NovacekJ.HoganR.1991“Narcissistic self-esteem management.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60: 911–918.
98.
ReinganumJ. F.1983“Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly.”American Economic Review, 73: 741–748.
99.
RhodewaltF.MorfC. C.1998“On self-aggrandizement and anger: A temporal analysis of narcissism and affective reactions to success and failure.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 672–685.
100.
RothaermelF. T.BoekerW.2008“Old technology meets new technology: Complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation.”Strategic Management Journal, 29: 47–77.
101.
RothaermelF. T.HessA. M.2007“Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-driven effects.”Organization Science, 18: 898–921.
102.
RothaermelF. T.HillC. W.2005“Technological discontinuities and complementary assets: A longitudinal study of industry and firm performance.”Organization Science, 16: 52–70.
103.
RothaermelF. T.ThursbyM.2007“Incubator firm failure or graduation? The role of university linkages.”Research Policy, 34: 1076–1090.
104.
SchweizerL.2005“Organizational integration of acquired biotechnology company into pharmaceutical companies: The need for a hybrid approach.”Academy of Management Journal, 48: 1051–1074.
105.
SapirE.1944“Grading: A study in semantics.”Philosophy of Science, 11: 93–116.
106.
SiggelkowN.2001“Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne.”Academy of Management Journal, 44: 838–857.
107.
StarbuckW. H.MillikenF. J.1988“Challenger: Fine-tuning the odds until something breaks.”Journal of Management Studies, 25: 319–340.
108.
TripsasM.1997“Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry.”Strategic Management Journal, 18: 119–142.
109.
TripsasM.2009“Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of ‘The Digital Photography Company.’”Organization Science, 20: 441–460.
110.
TripsasM.GavettiG.2000“Capabilities, cognition and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging.”Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1147–1161.
111.
TushmanM. L.AndersonP.1986“Technological discontinuities and organizational environments.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 439–465.
112.
TushmanM. L.NewmanW. H.RomanelliE.1986“Convergence and upheaval: Managing the unsteady pace of organizational evolution”California Management Review, 29 (1): 29–44.
113.
TwengeJ. M.KonrathS.FosterJ. D.CampbellK. W.BushmanB. J.2008“Egos inflating over time: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory.”Journal of Personality, 76: 875–900.
114.
ViranyB.TushmanM. L.RomanelliE.1992“Executive succession and organization outcomes in turbulent environments: An organization learning approach.”Organization Science, 3: 72–91.
115.
WallaceH. M.BaumeisterR. F.2002“The performance of narcissists rises and falls with perceived opportunity for glory.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82: 819–834.
116.
WatsonP. J.GrishamS. O.TrotterM. V.BidermanM. D.1984“Narcissism and empathy: Validity evidence for the narcissistic personality inventory.”Journal of Personality Assessment, 48: 301–305.
117.
WinkP.DonahueK.1997“The relation between two types of narcissism and boredom.”Journal of Research in Personality, 31: 136–140.
118.
WhorfB. L.1956“Science and linguistics.” In CarrollJ. B. (ed.), Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf: 207–219. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
119.
ZuckerL. G.DarbyM. R.1997“Present at the biotechnological revolution: Transformation of technological identity for a large incumbent pharmaceutical firm.”Research Policy, 26: 429–446.
