This article investigates the evolution of power with a formal theory that focuses on the influence network through which control of a group’s outcomes emerges via direct and indirect interpersonal influences on group members’ positions on a series of issues over time. Power evolves when individuals’ openness or closure to interpersonal influences correspond with their prior relative control over the group’s issue outcomes. In groups with members who are appraising the relative power of their members over the outcomes of prior issues, a mechanism of “reflected appraisals” will elevate and dampen members’ self-appraisals of their relative power and the amount of influence they accord to others. Across a series of issues over time, this mechanism suffices to generate state transitions of a group’s influence network. The result is an evolution of the group’s influence network such that, with rare exceptions, power becomes concentrated and the preferences of a single leader control the group’s outcomes via intermediaries. A laboratory experiment and a simulation provide support for the theory. The analysis suggests that the evolution of the influence network toward concentrated forms of power and control is generated by fundamental social psychological responses to power and may occur in all enduring social groups whose members are dealing with a lengthy sequence of issues, independent of the conditions of bureaucratic organizations.
AndersonN. H.1981Foundations of Information Integration Theory. New York: Academic Press.
2.
BrassD. J.1992 “Power in organizations: A social network perspective.” .Research in Politics and Society, 4: 295–323.
3.
BrassD. J.GalaskiewiczJ.GreveH. R.TsaiW.2004 “Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective.” .Academy of Management Journal, 47: 795–817.
4.
BurtR. S.1992Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BurtR. S.RonchiD.1990 “Contested control in a large manufacturing plant.” In WessieJ.FlapH. (eds.), Social Networks through Time: 121–157. Utrecht, The Netherlands: University of Holland.
6.
ChildressC. C.FriedkinN. E.2012 “Cultural reception and production: The social construction of meaning in book clubs.” .American Sociological Review, 77: 45–68.
7.
CookK. S.EmersonR. M.GillmoreM. R.YamegishiT.1983 “The distribution of power in exchange networks: Theory and experimental results.” .American Journal of Sociology, 89: 275–305.
8.
CooleyC. H.1964Human Nature and the Social Order. (First published in 1902.) New York: Schocken Books.
9.
DeGrootM. H.1974 “Reaching a consensus.” .Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69: 118–121.
10.
DianiM.McAdamD.2003Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
DoreianP.StokmanF. N.1997Evolution of Social Networks. Amsterdam: Gordan and Breach.
12.
FrenchJ. R. P.Jr.1956 “A formal theory of social power.” .Psychological Review, 63: 181–194.
13.
FrenchJ. R. P.Jr.RavenB.1959 “The bases of social power.” In CartwrightD. (ed.), Studies of Social Power: 150–167. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
14.
FriedkinN. E.1983 “Horizons of observability and limits of informal control in organizations.” .Social Forces, 62: 54–77.
15.
FriedkinN. E.1991 “Theoretical foundations for centrality measures.” .American Journal of Sociology, 96: 1478–1504.
16.
FriedkinN. E.1993 “An expected value model of social exchange outcomes.” In LawlerE. J.MarkovskyB.HeimerK.O’BrienJ. (eds.), Advances in Group Processes, 10: 163–193. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
17.
FriedkinN. E.1998A Structural Theory of Social Influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
FriedkinN. E.1999 “Choice shift and group polarization.” .American Sociological Review, 64: 856–875.
19.
FriedkinN. E.2001 “Norm formation in social influence networks.” .Social Networks, 23: 167–189.
20.
FriedkinN. E.2010 “The attitude-behavior linkage in behavioral cascades.” .Social Psychology Quarterly, 73: 196–213.
21.
FriedkinN. E.JohnsenE. C.1999 “Social influence networks and opinion change.” In LawlerE. J.MacyM. W. (eds.), Advances in Group Processes, 16: 1–29. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
22.
FriedkinN. E.JohnsenE. C.2002 “Control loss and Fayol’s gangplanks.” .Social Networks, 24: 395–406.
23.
FriedkinN. E.JohnsenE. C.2003 “Attitude change, affect control, and expectation states in the formation of influence networks.” In ThyeS. R.SkvoretzJ. (eds.), Advances in Group Processes, 20: 1–29. New York: Elsevier/JAI.
24.
FriedkinN. E.JohnsenE. C.2011Social Influence Network Theory: A Sociological Examination of Small Group Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
GecasV.SchwalbeM. L.1983 “Beyond the looking-glass self: Social structure and efficacy-based self-esteem.” .Social Psychology Quarterly, 46: 77–88.
26.
GranovetterM.1985 “Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness.” .American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510.
27.
HararyF.1959 “A criterion for unanimity in French’s theory of social power.” In CartwrightD. (ed.), Studies in Social Power: 168–182. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
28.
JacksonM. O.WattsA.2002 “The evolution of social and economic networks.” .Journal of Economic Theory, 106: 265–295.
29.
KilduffM.TsaiW.2003Social Networks and Organizations. London: Sage.
30.
KrackhardtD.1990 “Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations.” .Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 505–535.
31.
LawlerE. J.YoonJ.1993 “Power and the emergence of commitment behavior in negotiated exchange.” .American Sociological Review, 58: 465–481.
32.
LeachD. K.2005 “The iron law of what again? Conceptualizing oligarchy across organizational forms.” .Sociological Theory, 23: 312–337.
33.
LipsetS. M.TrowM. A.ColemanJ. S.1956Union Democracy: The Internal Politics of the International Typographical Union. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
34.
LikertR.1961New Patterns of Management, New York: McGraw-Hill.
35.
LikertR.1967The Human Organization: Its Management and Value. New York: McGraw-Hill.
MayhewB. H.LevingerR. L.1976 “On the emergence of oligarchy in human interaction.” .American Journal of Sociology, 81: 1017–1049.
38.
MeadG. H.1934Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
MichelsR.1962Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. (First published in 1911.) New York: Free Press.
40.
MilgramS.1974Obedience to Authority. New York: Harper & Row.
41.
MizruchiM. S.StearnsL. B.2001 “Getting deals done: The use of social networks in bank decision-making.” .American Sociological Review, 66: 647–671.
42.
MolmL. D.1997Coercive Power in Social Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
OstermanP.2006 “Overcoming oligarchy: Culture and agency in social movement organizations.” .Administrative Science Quarterly, 51: 622–649.
44.
ReitzesD. C.1980 “Beyond the looking glass self: Cooley’s social self and its treatment in introductory textbooks.” .Contemporary Sociology, 9: 631–640.
45.
RothschildJ.WhittJ. A.1986The Cooperative Workplace: Potentials and Dilemmas of Organizational Democracy and Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
StevensonW. B.GreenbergD.2000 “Agency and social networks: Strategies of action in a social structure of position, opposition, and opportunity.” .Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 651–678.
47.
StrangD.SouleS. A.1998 “Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills.” .Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 265–290.
48.
TannenbaumA. S.1968Control in Organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
49.
TannenbaumA. S.. 1974Hierarchy in Organizations: An International Comparison. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
50.
WattsD. J.DoddsP. S.2007 “Influentials, networks, and public opinion.” .Journal of Consumer Research, 34: 441–458.
51.
YeungK.-T.MartinJ. L.2003 “Looking glass self: An empirical test and elaboration.” .Social Forces, 81: 843–879.
52.
ZaldM.AshR.1966 “Social movement organization: Growth, decay, and change.” .Social Forces, 44: 327–340.
