The authors explore whether employees' willingness to perform organization citizenship behavior (OCB), or go “above and beyond” what is required by their jobs, is affected by social influence. The authors draw on social information processing and social learning theories to argue that OCB is contagious, or affected by the OCB of employees with whom a focal employee maintains social network ties. A study of admissions department employees reveals that strong advice ties between employees are positively and significantly related to similarity in OCB, whereas strong friendship ties and weak ties are not. Implications for research and practice, including suggestions for influencing ethical behavior in organizations, are discussed.
Allison, B.J., Voss, R.S., & Dryer, S. (2001). Student classroom and career success: The role of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Education for Business, 76, 282-288.
2.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
5.
Bolino, M. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? Academy of Management Review, 24, 82-98.
6.
Bommer, W.H., Miles, E.W., & Grover, S.L. (2003). Does one good turn deserve another? Coworker influences on employee citizenship. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 24, 181-196.
7.
Bordia, P., Jones, E., Gallois, C., Callan, V.J., & DiFonzo, N. (2006). Management are aliens! Rumors and stress during organizational change. Group & Organization Management , 31, 601-621.
Bowler, M., & Brass, D.J. (2006). Relational correlates of interpersonal citizenship behavior: A social network perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 70-82.
10.
Brass, D.J., & Burkhardt, M.E. (1993). Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 441-470.
11.
Brass, D.J., Butterfield, K.D., & Skaggs, B.C. (1998). Relationships and unethical behavior: A social networks perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23, 14-31.
12.
Bryant, S.E. (2005). The impact of peer mentoring on organizational knowledge creation and sharing: An empirical study in a software firm. Group & Organization Management, 30, 319-338.
13.
Burkhardt, M.E. (1994). Social interaction effects following a technological change: A longitudinal investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 869-898.
14.
Burkhardt, M.E., & Brass, D.J. (1990). Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effect of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 104-127.
15.
Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Camerman, J., Cropanzano, R., & Vandenberghe, C. (2007). The benefits of justice for temporary workers. Group & Organization Management , 32, 176-207.
17.
Cardona, P., Lawrence, B.S., & Bentler, P.M. (2004). The influence of social and work exchange relationships on organizational citizenship behavior. Group & Organization Management, 29, 219-247.
18.
Comer, J.M., Machleit, K.A., & Lagace, R.R. (1989). Psychometric assessment of a reduced version of the INDSALES. Journal of Business Research, 18, 291-302.
19.
Cross, R., & Prusak, L. (2002). The people who make organizations go-or stop. Harvard Business Review, 80(6), 105-112.
20.
Dabos, G.E., & Rousseau, D.M. (2004). Social interaction patterns shaping employee psychological contracts. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, OB, N1-N6.
21.
Deckop, J.R., Cirka, C.C., & Andersson, L.M. (2003). Doing unto others: The reciprocity of helping behavior in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 47, 101-113.
22.
Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51-59.
23.
Emerson, R. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335-362.
24.
Erickson, B.H. (1988). The relational basis of attitudes. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach (pp. 99-121). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Fassina, N.E., Jones, D.A., & Uggerslev, K.L. (2008). Relationship clean-up time: Using meta-analysis and path analysis to clarify relationships among job satisfaction, perceived fairness, and citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 34, 161-188.
26.
Gibbons, D.E. (2004). Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Administrative Science Quarterly , 49, 238-262.
27.
Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement . American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
28.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
29.
Granovetter, M. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited . In P. V. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 105-130). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30.
Hammer, M. (1985). Implications of behavioral and cognitive reciprocity in social network data. Social Networks, 7, 189-201.
31.
Hansen, M.T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111.
32.
Ho, V.T. (2005). Social influence on evaluations of psychological contract fulfillment. Academy of Management Review, 30, 113-128.
33.
Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422-447.
34.
Ibarra, H. (1993). Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants technological and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 471-501.
35.
Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 764-791.
36.
Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S.B. (1993). Power, social influence, and sensemaking: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 277-303.
37.
Ilgen, D., & Pulakos, E. (1999). The changing nature of performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38.
Kilduff, M. (1990). The interpersonal structure of decision-making: A social comparison approach to organizational choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 270-288.
39.
Krackhardt, D. & Stern, R.N. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 123-140.
40.
Marsden, P.V. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 435-463.
41.
Marsden, P.V., & Campbell, K.E. (1984). Measuring tie strength . Social Forces, 63, 482-501.
42.
McAllister, D.J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59.
43.
Morrison, E.W. (1993). Newcomer information seeking: Exploring types, modes, sources, and out-comes. Academy of Management Journal , 36, 557-589.
44.
Morrison, E.W. (2002). Newcomer's relationships: The role of social networks ties during socialization. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1149-1160.
45.
Murrell, A.J., & Zagenczyk, T.J. (2006). The gendered nature of role model status: An empirical study. Career Development International, 11, 560-576.
46.
Nelson, R.E. (1989). The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 377-401.
47.
O'Driscoll, M.P., Pierce, J.L., & Coghlan, A. (2006). The psychology of ownership: Work environment structure, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Group & Organization Management, 31, 388-416.
48.
Organ, D.W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
49.
Organ, D.W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775-802.
50.
Ostroff, C., & Kozlowski, S.W.J. (1992). Organizational socialization as a learning process: The role of information acquisition. Personnel Psychology, 45, 849-874.
51.
Paré, G., & Tremblay, M. (2007). The influence of high-involvement human resource practices, procedural justice, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors on information technology professionals' turnover intentions. Group & Organization Management, 32, 326-357.
52.
Podsakoff, P.M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S.B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 262-270.
53.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Paine, J.B., & Bachrach, D.G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513-563.
54.
Raider, H., & Krackhardt, D.J. (2001). Intraorganizational networks . In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), Companion to organizations (pp. 58-74). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
55.
Randel, A.E., & Ranft, A.L. (2007). Motivations to maintain social ties with coworkers: The moderating role of turnover intentions on information exchange. Group & Organization Management, 32, 208-232.
56.
Restubog, S.L.D., & Bordia, P. (2006). Workplace familism and psychological contract breach in the Philippines. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 563-585.
57.
Restubog, S.L.D., Bordia, P., & Bordia, S. (in press). The interactive effects of procedural justice and equity sensitivity in predicting responses to psychological contract breach: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology.
58.
Restubog, S.L.D., Bordia, P., & Tang, R.L. (2006). Effects of psychological contract breach on performance of IT employees: The mediating role of affective commitment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 299-306.
59.
Restubog, S.L.D., Hornsey, M., Bordia, P., & Esposo, S. (in press). Effects of psychological contract breach on organizational citizenship behaviors: Insights from the group value model. Journal of Management Studies.
60.
Rice, R.E., & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 219-244.
61.
Salancik, G.R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly , 23, 224-253.
62.
Scott, B.A., & Colquitt, J.A. (2007). Are organizational justice effects bounded by individual differences? An examination of equity sensitivity, exchange ideology, and the Big Five. Group & Organization Management, 32, 290-325.
63.
Smith, C.A., Organ, D.W., & Near, J.P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 655-663.
64.
Stork, D., & Richards, W.D. (1992). Nonrespondents in communication network studies: Problems and possibilities. Group & Organization Management, 17, 193-209.
65.
Turnipseed, D.L. (2002). Are good soldiers good? Exploring the link between organizational citizenship behavior and personal ethics. Journal of Business Research, 55, 1-15.
66.
Umphress, E.E., Labianca, G., Brass, D.J., Kass, E., & Scholten, L. (2003). The role of instrumental and expressive social ties in employees' perceptions of organizational justice. Organization Science, 14, 738-753.
67.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68.
Zagenczyk, T.J., & Murrell, A.J. (in press). It is better to receive than to give: Advice network effects on job and work-unit attachment. Journal of Business and Psychology .
