Previous studies in the Nordic context have found a positive association between stronger labor market attachment and entry into parenthood (i.e. first birth), with the association being stronger for men than women and influenced by educational attainment and life-course stage. Using total population register data and event history methods, this study asks whether and how the relationship between employment status and entry into parenthood has changed for women and men born in Finland in the 1970s, 1980s, and early 1990s. We first examine how the employment situations in which women and men make decisions about entering parenthood have changed across cohorts. Our results indicate that episodes of unemployment have not increased across cohorts of women and men who are (still) childless. At the same time, young adults are increasingly combining studies and paid employment. Stable employment promotes entry into parenthood for both men and women, although the association remains stronger for men. Sufficient economic resources to start a family may have become even more important in recent cohorts, as the negative association between longer-term unemployment and transition to parenthood appears to have intensified. We also observe a cohort trend toward delayed or foregone entry into parenthood occurring regardless of labor market status. To conclude, although weak labor market status is associated with lower first-birth rates, it is unlikely to be a major driver of the cohort fertility decline, as we observe no deterioration in young adults’ labor market status and only modest changes in its association with entry into parenthood.
AdseraA (2011) Where are the babies? Labor market conditions and fertility in Europe. European Journal of Population27(1): 1–32.
2.
AhnNMiraP (2002) A note on the changing relationship between fertility and female employment rates in developed countries. Journal of Population Economics15(4): 667–682. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20007839.
3.
AlderottiG (2022) Female employment and first childbirth in Italy: What news?Genus78: 14.
4.
AlderottiGVignoliDBacciniM, et al. (2021) Employment instability and fertility in Europe: A meta-analysis. Demography58(3): 871–900.
5.
AutorDH (2014) Skills, education, and the rise of earnings inequality among “the 99 other percent”. Science344(6186): 843–851.
6.
BalboNBillariFCMillsM (2013) Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research. European Journal of Population29(1): 1–38.
7.
BazzaniGDommermuthLLappegardT, et al. (2025) Frontiers of self-relatization. How (un)certainty and imaginaries shape fertility intentions in Italy and Norway. Acta Sociologica. Epub ahead of print 19 February 2025. DOI: 10.1177/00016993241300434.
8.
BeckerG (1993) A Treatise of the Family, Enlarged editionCambridge MA: First Harvard University Press.
9.
BrewsterKLRindfussRR (2000) Fertility and women’s employment in industrialized countries. Annual Review of Sociology26: 271–296. https://www.jstor.org/stable/223445.
10.
ComolliCL (2021) Couples’ paid work, state-level unemployment, and first births in the United States. Demographic Research45(38): 1149–1184.
11.
ComolliCLNeyerGAnderssonG, et al. (2021) Beyond the economic gaze: Childbearing during and after recessions in the Nordic countries. European Journal of Population37(2): 473–520.
12.
DribeMStanforsM (2009) Education, work and parenthood: Comparing the experience of young men and women in Sweden. Journal of Family and Economic Issues30: 32–42.
13.
ElderGH (1994) Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly57(1): 4–15.
14.
Esping-AndersenGBillariFC (2015) Re-theorizing family demographics. Population and Development Review41(1): 1–31.
15.
Eurostat (2023) Participation of young people in education and the labour market. Statistics Explained. Available at: Participation of young people in education and the labour market – Statistics Explained (europa.eu) (accessed 20 June 2024).
16.
GoldscheiderFBernhardtELappegårdT (2015) The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review41(2): 207–239.
17.
GreenFFelsteadAGallieD, et al. (2022) Working still harder. ILR Review75(2): 458–487.
18.
GreveBKvistJ (2021) Nordic welfare state changes especially in the light of migration and the financial crisis. In: GreveB (eds) Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing, 143–154.
19.
HaatajaA (2008) Selvitys vähimmäismääräisen vanhempainrahan kehityksestä sekä työsuhteen yleisyydestä vanhempainrahan ja kotihoidon tuen saajilla [Development of the Minimum Parental Benefit and Employment Among Persons Receiving Parental Benefit and Home Care Allowance]. Helsinki: KELA.
20.
HellstrandJNisénJMirandaV, et al. (2021) Not just later, but fewer: Novel trends in cohort fertility in the Nordic countries. Demography58(4): 1373–1399.
21.
HellstrandJNisénJMyrskyläM (2022) Less partnering, less children, or both? Analysis of the drivers of first birth decline in Finland since 2010. European Journal of Population38(2): 191–221.
22.
HellstrandJNisénJMyrskyläM (2024) Educational field, economic uncertainty, and fertility decline in Finland in 2010–2019. European Sociological Review40: 754–771.
23.
HellstrandJNisénJMyrskyläM (2025) Economic uncertainty and men’s fertility: Analysing the 2010s fertility decline in Finland by field of education and employment characteristics. FLUX Working Papers 32/2025. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/j359z_v1.
24.
HoemB (2000) Entry into motherhood in Sweden: The influence of economic factors on the rise and fall in fertility, 1986–1997. Demographic Research2(4). DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2000.2.4.
25.
HsuC-H (2023) How women’s employment instability affects birth transitions: The moderating role of family policies in 27 European countries. European Sociological Review39: 935–956. 10.1093/esr/jcad037.
26.
HuininkJKohliM (2014) A life-course approach to fertility. Demographic Research30(45): 1293–1326.
27.
JalovaaraM (2012) Socio-economic resources and first-union formation in Finland, cohorts born in 1969–81. Population Studies66(1): 69–85.
28.
JalovaaraM (2013) Socioeconomic resources and the dissolution of cohabitations and marriages. European Journal of Population29(2): 167–193.
29.
JalovaaraMAnderssonL (2023) A register-based account of period trends in union prevalence, entries, and exits by educational level for men and women in Finland. Demographic Research48(14): 373–386.
30.
JalovaaraMAnderssonLMiettinenA (2022) Parity disparity: Educational differences in Nordic fertility across parities and number of reproductive partners. Population Studies76(1): 119–136.
31.
JalovaaraMKuluH (2018) Separation risk over union duration: An immediate itch?European Sociological Review34(5): 486–500.
32.
JonesLESchoonbroodtATertiltM (2011) Fertility theories. Can they explain the negative fertility-income relationship? In: ShovenJB (eds) Demography and the Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 43–100.
33.
KangasO (2019) Finland – From the deep crisis of the 1990s to the Great Recession. In: ÓlafssonSDalyMKangasOPalmeJ (eds) Welfare and the Great Recession: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 154–174.
34.
KögelT (2004) Did the association between fertility and female employment within OECD countries really change its sign?Journal of Population Economics17(1): 45–65. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20007894.
35.
KreyenfeldM (2015) Economic uncertainty and fertility. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (Supplement)67: 59–80.
36.
KreyenfeldMAnderssonG (2014) Socioeconomic differences in the unemployment and fertility nexus: Evidence from Denmark and Germany. Advances in Life Course Research21: 59–73.
37.
KreyenfeldMAnderssonGPailhéA (2012) Economic uncertainty and family dynamics in Europe: Introduction. Demographic Research S27(28): 835–852.
38.
KristensenAPLappegårdT (2022) Unemployment and fertility: The relationship between individual and aggregated unemployment and fertility during 1994–2014 in Norway. Demographic Research46(35): 1037–1064. Scopus.
39.
LiefbroerACCorijnM (1999) Who, what, where, and when? Specifying the impact of educational attainment and labour force participation on family formation. European Journal of Population15(1): 45–75.
40.
Luci-GreulichAThévenonO (2014) Does economic advancement ‘cause’ a re-increase in fertility? An empirical analysis for OECD countries (1960–2007). European Journal of Population30(2): 187–221.
41.
LundströmKEAnderssonG (2012) Labor market status, migrant status, and first childbearing in Sweden. Demographic Research27(25): 719–742.
42.
MatysiakAVignoliD (2008) Fertility and women’s employment: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Population24(4): 363–384.
43.
MatysiakAVignoliD (2013) Diverse effects of women’s employment on fertility: Insights from Italy and Poland. European Journal of Population29(3): 273–302.
44.
MayerKU (2009) New directions in life course research. Annual Review of Sociology35(1): 413–433.
45.
MiettinenAJalovaaraM (2020) Unemployment delays first birth but not for all. Life stage and educational differences in the effects of employment uncertainty on first births. Advances in Life Course Research43: 100320.
46.
MiettinenARahnuLJalovaaraM (2025) Employment uncertainty and entry into parenthood: Reproducibility and code package. Open Science Framework (OSF). DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/CB8YA.
47.
MillsMBlossfeldH-P (2005) Globalization, uncertainty and the early life course. A theoretical framework. In: BlossfeldH-PKlijzingEMillsMKurzK (eds) Globalization, Uncertainty, and Youth in Society. New York: Routledge, 1–24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297802732.
48.
MillsMBlossfeldH-P (2013) The second demographic transition meets globalization: A comprehensive theory to understand changes in family formation in an era of rising uncertainty. In: EvansABaxterJ (eds) Negotiating the Life Course. Life Course Research and Social Policies. Dordrecht: Springer, 1, 9–33.
49.
NeelsKTheunynckZWoodJ (2013) Economic recession and first births in Europe: Recession-induced postponement and recuperation of fertility in 14 European countries between 1970 and 2005. International Journal of Public Health58(1): 43–55.
50.
Ní BhrolcháinMBeaujouanE (2012) Fertility postponement is largely due to rising educational enrolment. Population Studies66(3): 311–327.
51.
NisénJErlandssonAJalovaaraM (2024) Gendered relationship of childbearing with earnings accumulated by midlife in two Nordic countries. Journal of Family and Economic Issues46: 685–707.
52.
OECD (2022) Education at a Glance 2022: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
QuintiniG (2015) Working and learning: A diversity of patterns. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 169. Available at:10.1787/5jrw4bz6hl43-en.
55.
RahnuLJalovaaraM (2023) Partnership dynamics and entry into parenthood: Comparison of Finnish birth cohorts 1969–2000. Advances in Life Course Research56: 100548.
56.
RasmussenSNättiJLarsenTP, et al. (2019) Nonstandard Employment in the Nordics – Toward Precarious Work?Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies9. 10.18291/njwls.v9iS6.114689.
57.
SaloniemiASalonenJNummiT, et al. (2020) The diversity of transitions during early adulthood in the Finnish labour market. Journal of Youth Studies24(7): 851–870.
58.
SchererSBriniE (2023) Employment instability and childbirth over the last 20 years in Italy. European Journal of Population39: 31.
59.
SchmittC (2012) A cross-national perspective on unemployment and first births. European Journal of Population28(3): 303–335.
60.
SpéderZBartusT (2017) Educational enrolment, double-Status positions and the transition to motherhood in Hungary. European Journal of Population33(1): 55–85.
StevensonBWolfersJ (2007) Marriage and divorce: Changes and their driving forces. Journal of Economic Perspectives21(2): 27–52.
67.
SvalundJCasinowsky BergströmGHåkanssonK, et al. (2013) Stress testing the Nordic models: Manufacturing labour adjustments during crisis. European Journal of Industrial Relations19(3): 183–200.
68.
TomatisFImpicciatoreR (2023) Labour market participation and fertility in seven European countries: A comparative perspective. Comparative Population Studies48: 183–216.
69.
TosunJUntMWadensjöE (2017) Youth-oriented active labour market policies: Explaining policy effort in the Nordic and the Baltic states. Social Policy & Administration51(4): 598–616.
70.
Van WijkDBillariFC (2024) Fertility postponement, economic uncertainty, and the increasing income prerequisites of parenthood. Population and Development Review50(2): 287–322.
71.
Van WijkDCDe ValkHAGLiefbroerAC (2022) Economic precariousness and the transition to parenthood: A dynamic and multidimensional approach. European Journal of Population38(3): 457–483.
72.
VignoliDGuettoRBazzaniG, et al. (2020) A reflection on economic uncertainty and fertility in Europe: The narrative framework. Genus76(1): 28.
73.
VignoliDTocchioniVMatteiA (2020) The impact of job uncertainty on first-birth postponement. Advances in Life Course Research45: 100308.
74.
WerdingM (2014) Children are costly, but raising them may pay: The economic approach to fertility. Demographic Research30(8): 253–276.
75.
WoodJNeelsK (2017) First a job, then a child? Subgroup variation in women’s employment-fertility link. Advances in Life Course Research33: 38–52.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
