This study analyzes trends in the timing of entry into first marriage and the tendency for Taiwanese to choose partners of similar age, educational attainment, and ethnicity. Using pooled data from the 1991, 1996, 2001, and 2006 Taiwan Social Change Surveys, we examine the shift from early and universal marriage toward late and less marriage among postwar birth cohorts. After educational expansion, higher educated Taiwanese are more likely to postpone marriage, but poorly educated men have become most likely to remain single. In 2012, among primary-educated men born in 1968-1972, 42% were never-married. While men still prefer to marry younger women, the age gap between spouses has narrowed significantly, and following the increase in educational attainment of both genders, there is an increase in ethnic intermarriage and educational homogamy. However, if women postpone marriage to older ages, their chances of marrying men with equivalent education decreases significantly.
BeckerG. S. (1973). A theory of marriage. In SchultzT. W. (Ed.), Economics of the family: Marriage, children and human capital (pp. 299-344). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago for the National Bureau of Economic Research.
2.
BeckerG. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BlossfeldH.-P. (1995). The new role of women: Family formation in modern societies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
4.
BumpassL. L.SweetJ.CherlinA. (1991). The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 913-927.
5.
ChangY.-H.FuY.-C. (2004). The evolution of the Taiwan social change surveys. In Japanese General Social Survey (Eds.), Birth of JGSS and its fruit: Social surveys in different countries and areas and JGSS (pp. 149-160). Osaka, Japan: Osaka University of Commerce.
6.
ChangY.-H.TuS.-H.LiaoP.-S. (Eds.). (2012). Final report on Taiwan Social Change Survey, year 2012. Taipei, Taiwan: Academia Sinica.
7.
ChenY.-H. (2008). The significance of cross-border marriage in a low fertility society: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 39, 331-352.
8.
ChenY.-H. (2012). Trends in low fertility and policy responses in Taiwan. Japanese Journal of Population, 10, 78-88.
9.
CherlinA. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848-861.
10.
CoaleA. (1971). Age patterns of marriage. Population Studies, 25, 193-214.
11.
CoaleA.McNeilD. R. (1972). The distribution by age of the frequency of first marriage in a female cohort. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 743-749.
12.
Council of Europe. (2006). Recent demographic developments in Europe 2005. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
13.
Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics. (2002). 2000 Household census report, Republic of China: Vol. 1. Taipei, Taiwan: The Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, Republic of China.
14.
GoldsteinJ. R.KenneyC. T. (2001). Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. American Sociological Review, 66, 506-519.
15.
HsiaoA.-C. (2004). Contemporary Taiwanese cultural nationalism. London, England: Routledge Press.
16.
KalmijnM. (2013). The educational gradient in marriage: A comparison of 25 European countries. Demography, 50, 1499-1520.
17.
KanekoR. (2003). Elaboration of the Coale-McNeil nuptiality model as the generalized log gamma distribution: A new identity and empirical enhancements. Demographic Research, 9(10), 223-262.
18.
LeeM.-L. (1994). Population changes of marital status in Taiwan during the twentieth century. Journal of Population Studies, 16, 1-15.
19.
LuohM.-C. (2001). Differences in educational attainment across ethnic and gender groups in Taiwan. Taiwan Economic Review, 29, 117-152.
20.
MareR. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56, 15-32.
21.
Ministry of the Interior. (2013a). Taiwan-Fukien demographic fact book. Taipei, Taiwan: Department of Household Registration, Ministry of the Interior, Republic of China.
22.
Ministry of the Interior. (2013b). Annual population static statistics: Marriage and family. Ministry of the Interior, Republic of China. Retrieved from http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/gender/list03.html
23.
MoffittR. A. (2000). Female wages, male wages, and the economic model of marriage: The basic evidence. In WaiteL.BachrachC.HindinM.ThomsonE.ThorntonA. (Eds.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 302-319). New York, nY: Aldine de Gruyter.
24.
OchiaiE. (1996). The Japanese family system in transition: A sociological analysis of family change in postwar Japan. Tokyo, Japan: LTCB International Library Foundation.
25.
OnoH. (2003). Women’s economic standing, marriage timing, and cross-national contexts of gender. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 275-286.
26.
OppenheimerV. K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 563-591.
27.
OppenheimerV. K.KalmijnM.LimN. (1997). Men’s career development and marriage timing during a period of rising inequality. Demography, 34, 311-330.
28.
PrestonS.HeuvelineP.GuillotM. (2001). Demography: Measuring and modeling population processes. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
29.
QianZ.LichterD. T. (2007). Social boundaries and marital assimilation: Interpreting trends in racial and ethnic intermarriage. American Sociological Review, 72, 68-94.
30.
RaymoJ. M. (2003). Educational attainment and the transition to first marriage among Japanese women. Demography, 40, 83-103.
31.
RaymoJ. M.IwasawaM. (2005). Marriage market mismatches in Japan: An alternative view of the relationship between women’s education and marriage. American Sociological Review, 70, 801-822.
32.
RetherfordR.OgawaN.MatsukuraR. (2001). Late marriage and less marriage in Japan. Population and Development Review, 27, 65-102.
33.
ThorntonA.LinH.-S. (1994). Social change and the family in Taiwan. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
TsayR.-M.WuL.-H. (2006). Marrying someone from an outside group: An analysis of boundary-crossing marriages in Taiwan. Current Sociology, 54, 165-186.
35.
Van PoppelF.LiefbroerA. C.VermuntJ. K.SmeenkW. (2001). Love, necessity and opportunity: Changing patterns of marital age homogamy in the Netherlands, 1850-1993. Population Studies, 55, 1-13.
36.
WangF.-C. (2001). Ethnic intermarriage and ethnic relationship in Taiwan: A revisit. In LauS.-K.WanP.-S.LeeM.-K.WongS.-L. (Eds.), Social transformation and cultural outlook (pp. 393-430). Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong.
37.
YangC.-L.LiT.-C.ChenK.-J. (2006). Assortative mating in Taiwan: Changes and persistence. Journal of Population Studies, 33, 1-32.
38.
YuW.-H. (2009). Gendered trajectories: Women, work, and social change in Japan and Taiwan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
