This article discusses the relations between the features of the largest firms structuring Brazilian capitalism and the configuration of the social space of their directors. We assess the social trajectories and properties of 175 CEOs and chairpersons from the 100 largest domestic and foreign companies operating in the country through multiple correspondence analysis, finding that the major forms of distinction in this social space are associated with the oppositions between the national and the foreign and between private/economic and public/educational forms of reproduction. Cross-fertilizing works of political economy and sociology about Brazilian capitalism and the sociology of elites, we show that the distribution of agents in the identified structure is homologous to the so-called “triple alliance” of the largest firms of Brazilian capitalism. We also identify a subgroup of the domestic elite that concentrates cultural and social capital and is particularly proximate to the state.
Abu-El-HajJ (2007) From interdependence to neo-mercantilism: Brazilian capitalism in the age of globalization. Latin American Perspectives34(5): 92–114.
2.
AmatucciMAvrichirI (2008) IB theory and the entry of MNCs in Brazil from 1850 to 2007. Review of Business Management10(28): 234–248.
3.
BaccaroLPontussonJ (2016) Rethinking comparative political economy: The growth model perspective. Politics & Society44(2): 175–207.
4.
BlasiusJLebaronFLe RouxB, et al. (2019) Empirical Investigations of Social Space. Cham: Springer.
5.
BoschiRR (2010) Estado desenvolvimentista no Brasil: Continuidades e incertidumbres. Ponto de Vista2: 1–34.
6.
BourdieuP (1998) The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
7.
BourdieuP (2005) O Campo Econômico. Política & Sociedade4(6): 21–55.
8.
BourdieuP (2020) The field of power and the division of the labour of domination. In: DenordFPalmeMRéauB (eds) Researching Elites and Power: Theory, Methods, Analyses. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 33–44.
9.
BourdieuPde Saint MartinM (1978) Le Patronat. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales20: 3–82.
10.
Bresser-PereiraLC (1974) Empresários e Administradores No Brasil. São Paulo: Editora Brasiliense.
11.
Bresser-PereiraLC (2011) Cinco Modelos de Capitalismo. Texto para Discussão, no. 280. São Paulo: Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas.
12.
Bresser-PereiraLC (2015) State-society cycles and political pacts in a national dependent society Brazil. Latin American Research Review50(2): 3–22.
13.
Bresser-PereiraLC (2021) A Construção Política e Econômica Do Brasil: Sociedade, Economia e Estado Desde a Independência. 4a. São Paulo: Editora, 34.
14.
BühlmannFDavidTMachA (2012a) Political and economic elites in Switzerland: Personal interchange, interactional relations and structural homology. European Societies14(5): 727–754.
15.
BühlmannFDavidTMachA (2012b) The Swiss business elite (1980–2000): How the changing composition of the elite explains the decline of the Swiss company network. Economy and Society41(2): 199–226.
16.
CardosoFHFalettoE (1970) Dependência e Desenvolvimento Na América Latina. 4a. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores.
17.
CarrilloIR (2014) The new developmentalism and the challenges to long-term stability in Brazil. Latin American Perspectives41(5): 59–74.
18.
CometC (2019) How does the inner circle shape the policy-planning network in France?Socio-Economic Review17(4): 1021–1041.
19.
CousinBKhanSMearsA (2018) Theoretical and methodological pathways for research on elites. Socio-Economic Review16(2): 225–249.
20.
Crivelenti e CastroL (2021) Brazilian dependent capitalism under the hegemony of financialized capital. Latin American Perspectives49(2): 39–55.
21.
CrouchC (2005) Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
Da CruzWVGNetoMSRibeiroEMS (2023) Corporate ownership network: The hierarchical capitalism in the Brazilian context. RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas63(2): 1–15.
23.
Da RochaMAMda SilveiraJMFJ (2015) Propriedade e controle dos setores privatizados no Brasil: Uma avaliação da reestruturação societária pós-privatização. Revista de Economia Contemporânea19(1): 49–73.
24.
DesiderioWA, 2017. Banco de desenvolvimento ou de investimento? A trajetória da BNDESPAR no capitalismo brasileiro. PhD Thesis. Universidade Federal de São Carlos.
25.
DonadoneJCJardimMAC (2011) Centralidades e as Fronteiras Das Empresas Do Seculo 21. Bauru: EDUSC.
26.
DudouetF-XGrémontÉJolyH, et al. (2014) Back to the field of economic power in France. Social study of the CAC 40 firms executives. Revue Française de Socio-Économie13(1): 23–48.
27.
EllersgaardCHLarsenAGMunkMD (2013) A very economic elite: The case of the Danish top CEOs. Sociology47(6): 1051–1071.
28.
EvansP (1979) Dependent Development. The Alliance of Multinational, State and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
29.
EvansP (1995) Embedded Autonomy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
FINEP (1978) Estrutura industrial e empresas líderes. Rio de Janeiro: FINEP.
31.
FligsteinN (1990) The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
32.
FrançoisPLemercierC (2016) Une financiarisation à la française (1979–2009). Mutations des grandes entreprises et conversion des élites. Revue Française de Sociologie57(2): 269–320.
33.
FrankAG (1967) Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: NYU Press.
34.
FurtadoC (1968) Subdesenvolvimento e Estagnação Na América Latina, 3rd edRio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
35.
GrünR (2015) Decifra-Me Ou Te Devoro: O Brasil e a Dominação Financeira. São Paulo: Alameda.
36.
HanckéBRhodesMThatcherM(eds) (2007) Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in the European Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
HartmannM (2000) Class-specific habitus and the social reproduction of the business elite in Germany and France. The Sociological Review48(2): 241–261.
38.
HartmannM (2018) The international business elite: Fact or fiction?. In: KorsnesOHeilbronJHjellbrekkeJ, et al. (eds) New Directions in Elite Studies. New York, NY: Routledge, 31–45.
39.
HjellbrekkeJLe RouxBKorsnesO, et al. (2007) The Norwegian field of power anno 2000. European Societies9(2): 245–273.
40.
HopewellK (2016) The accidental agro-power: Constructing comparative advantage in Brazil. New Political Economy21(6): 536–554.
41.
JacksonGDeegR (2006) How many varieties of capitalism? Comparing the comparative institutional analyses of capitalist diversity. Discussion Paper 06/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (MPIfG). Also available at SSRN Electronic Journal.
42.
JardimMAC, 2007. Entre a solidariedade e o risco: Sindicatos e fundos de pensão em tempos de governo Lula. PhD Thesis. Universidade Federal de São Carlos.
43.
KohliA (2004) State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
KorsnesOHeilbronJHjellbrekkeJ, et al. (2018) New Directions in Elite Studies, 1st edNew York: Routledge.
45.
LarsenAG (2022) soc.ca: Multiple correspondence analysis. R package version 0.8.0. Available at: https://github.com/Rsoc/soc.ca.
46.
Le RouxBRouanetH (2010) Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. London: Sage Publications.
47.
LuPFanXFuF (2021) Profile of the super rich in China: A social space analysis. The British Journal of Sociology72(3): 543–565.
48.
LundingJAEllersgaardCHLarsenAG (2020) The craft of elite prosopography. In: DenordFPalmeMRéauB (eds) Researching Elites and Power: Theory, Methods, Analyses. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 57–70.
49.
MariniRM (1969) Subdesarrollo y Revolución. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
50.
MayCNolkeAten BrinkT (2019) Public-private coordination in large emerging economies: The case of Brazil, India and China. Contemporary Politics25(3): 276–291.
51.
MorganGHeikeDGomesM (2021) Extending varieties of capitalism to emerging economies: What can we learn from Brazil?New Political Economy26(4): 540–553.
52.
MusacchioALazariniSG (2014) Reinventing State Capitalism: Leviathan in Business, Brazil and Beyond. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
NaudetJAllorantAFerryM (2018) Heirs, corporate aristocrats and ‘meritocrats’: The social space of top CEOs and chairmen in India. Socio-Economic Review16(2): 307–339.
54.
NölkeA (2010) A “BRIC”-variety of capitalism and social inequality: The case of Brazil. Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas Sobre as Américas4(1): 1.
55.
NölkeATen BrinkTMayC, et al. (2020) State-Permeated Capitalism in Large Emerging Economies, 1st edNew York: Routledge.
56.
NölkeAVliegenthartA (2009) Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in east central Europe. World Politics61(4): 670–702.
57.
NonnenbergMJB (2003) Determinantes dos investimentos externos e impactos das impresas multinacionais no Brasil: as décadas de 1970 e 1990. Texto para discussão 969. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada.
58.
OuchiWG (1980) Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly25(1): 129–141.
59.
Pedroso NetoAJ (2012) A privatização de uma empresa: Uma ação econômica enraizada nas relações sociais. Caderno CRH25(66): 391–408.
60.
PetryJKoddenbrockKNölkeA (2023) State capitalism and capital markets: Comparing securities exchanges in emerging markets. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space55(1): 143–164.
61.
RangelIM (1957) A Dualidade Básica Da Economia Brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Iseb, Instituto Superior de Estudos Brasileiros.
62.
RibeiroEJJFilhoEBS (2013) Investimento externo direto no brasil no período 2003–2012: Aspectos regionais e setoriais. Boletim de Economia e Política Internacional, IPEA Brasilia-DF14: 29–46.
63.
RochaD (2014) Estado, empresariado e variedades de capitalismo no brasil: Política de internacionalização de empresas privadas no governo Lula. Revista de Sociologia e Política22(51): 77–96.
64.
RodriguezO (2009) O Estruturalismo Latino-Americano. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
65.
RossierT (2019) Prosopography, networks, life course sequences, and so on. Quantifying with or beyond Bourdieu?Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique144(1): 6–39.
66.
SchmidtV (2003) French capitalism transformed, yet still a third variety of capitalism. Economy and Society32(4): 526–554.
67.
SchneiderBR (2009) Hierarchical market economies and varieties of capitalism in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies41(3): 553–575.
68.
SchneiderBR (2013) Hierarchical Capitalism in Latin America: Business, Labor, and the Challenges of Equitable Development. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69.
TavaresMC (1976) Da Substituição de Importações Ao Capitalismo Financeiro: Ensaios Sobre Economia Brasileira. 6a. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores.
70.
Valor. (2021) Valor grandes grupos: 200 Maiores. Valor Econômico, December. São Paulo. Available at: https://valor.globo.com/revistas.
71.
VilaMLCandidoSEAFerrattiGM, et al. (2024) The configuration of the largest Brazilian banks’ board of directors: Trajectories and capitals of Latin America’s financial elite. International Journal of Emerging Markets19(10): 3160–3181.
72.
WittMAKabbach de CastroLRAmaeshiK, et al. (2018) Mapping the business systems of 61 major economies: A taxonomy and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems research. Socio-Economic Review16(1): 5–38.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
