The central aim of this paper is identifying the existing political leeway for the reduction of deprivation levels in Europe. The links between household and individual characteristics and risks of material deprivation have been abundantly researched, but what are the political institutions that modify and possibly buffer these odds? Welfare state differences have been portrayed in depth but their association with social outcomes such as deprivation is less clear. By identifying the impact of decommodification and defamilisation policies on deprivation exposure, we seek to fill this gap. Our results, based on European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions 2012 to 2013 cross-sectional micro data, reveal that social programmes that cover large segments of the population and follow a needs-based approach are linked to lower odds of being materially deprived. A significant number of European cross-country differences in deprivation rates can thus be traced back to varying levels of social assistance, as well as to differences in the provision of public healthcare. Defamilisation policies are, despite increased risks for (single parent) families, not yet addressing the problem of low living standards successfully. An extension of childcare services, however, seems promising for lowering deprivation among families, particularly in countries with high levels of involuntary part-time work.
BambraC (2004) The worlds of welfare: Illusory and gender blind?Social Policy & Society3(3): 201–211.
2.
BambraC (2005) Worlds of welfare and the health care discrepancy. Social Policy & Society4(1): 31–41.
3.
BambraC (2007) Defamilisation and welfare state regimes: A cluster analysis. International Journal of Social Welfare16(4): 326–338.
4.
BargainOHimmervolHViitamäkiH (2012) No Claim, No Pain: Measuring the Non-Take-up of Social Assistance Using Register Data. Journal of Economic Inequality10(3): 375–395.
5.
BestHWolfC (2012) Model comparison and result interpretation in logit and probit regressions [Modellvergleich und Ergebnisinterpretation in Logit und Probitregressionen]. Cologne Journal of Sociology and Social Psychology [Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie]64: 377–396.
6.
CameronACTrivediPK (2010) Microeconomics Using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.
7.
CantillonB (2011) The paradox of the social investment state: Growth, employment and poverty in the Lisbon era. Journal of European Social Policy21(5): 432–449.
8.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
9.
Esping-AndersenG (1993) Changing Classes. Stratification and Mobility in Post-Industrial Societies. London: SAGE.
10.
Eurofound (2015) Access to Social Benefits: Reducing Non-Take-up. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
11.
Eurostat (2010) Income Poverty and Material Deprivation in European Countries. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
12.
FerrariniTNelsonKKorpiW. (2013) Social citizenship rights and social insurance replacement rate validity: Pitfalls and possibilities. Journal of European Public Policy20(9): 1251–1266.
13.
FuscoAGuioAMarlierE (2010) Characterising the income poor and the materially deprived in European countries. In: AtkinsonTBMarlierE (eds) Income and Living Conditions in Europe. Luxemburg: EU, pp. 133–154.
14.
FuscoAGuioAMarlierE (2011) Income Poverty and Material Deprivation in European Countries. CEPS/INSTEAD Working Paper Series 04. https://ideas.repec.org/p/irs/cepswp/2011-04.html (accessed 24 May 2018).
15.
GuioAFuscoAMarlierE (2009) A European Union Approach to Material Deprivation using EU-SILC and Eurobarometer data. IRISS Working Paper Series (19). https://ideas.repec.org/p/irs/iriswp/2009-19.html (accessed 24 May 2018).
16.
GuioAGordonDMarlierE (2012) Measuring Material Deprivation in the EU. Indicators for the Whole Population and Child-Specific Indicators. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
17.
GuioACMarlierEGordonD. (2016) Improving the measurement of material deprivation at the European Union level. Journal of European Social Policy26(3): 219–233.
18.
IacovouMKaminskaOLevyH (2012) Using EU-SILC data for cross-national analysis: Strengths, problems and recommendations. ISER Working Paper 2012-02. Essex: ISER. Available at: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/eseiserwp/2012-03.htm (accessed 24 May 2018).
19.
IsraelS (2015) More than cash: Societal influences on the risk of material deprivation. Social Indicators Research129(2): 619–637.
20.
JaumotteF (2003) Female labour force participation: Past trends and main determinants in OECD countries. SSRN Electronic Journal. Available at:http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2344556 (accessed 24 May 2018).
21.
KammerANiehuesJPeichlA (2012) Welfare regimes and welfare state outcomes in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy22(5): 455–471.
22.
KauttoM (2002) Investing in services in West European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy12(1): 53–65.
23.
LayteRWhelanBMaitreE. (2001) Explaining levels of deprivation in the European Union. Acta Sociologica44(2): 105–122.
24.
LelkesOGasiorK (2012) Income poverty and social exclusion in the EU. Situation in 2008 and trends (based on EU-SILC 2005–2009). European Centre Policy Briefs. January 2012. Available at:https://www.euro.centre.org/publications/detail/351 (accessed 24 May 2018).
25.
ListerR (1994) She has other duties: Women citizenship and social security. In: BaldwinSFalkinghamJ (eds) Social Security and Social Change: New Challenges to the Beveridge Model. New York, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 31–44.
26.
LohmannHZagelH (2016). Family policy in comparative perspective: The concepts and measurement of familisation and defamilisation. Journal of European Social Policy26(1): 48–65.
27.
MackJLansleyS (1985) Poor Britain. London: Allen & Unwin.
28.
MaquetIMaestriVThévenotC (2016) The coverage rate of income support measures in the EU: measurement and challenges. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Working Paper 2/2016. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at:http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=16672&langId=en (accessed 24 May 2018).
29.
MarchalSMarxI (2018) Stemming the tide: What have European Union countries done to support low-wage workers in an era of downward wage pressures?Journal of European Social Policy28(1): 18–33.
30.
MarxINolanBOliveraJ (2014) The welfare state and anti-poverty policy in rich countries. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 8154. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labour. Available at: http://ftp.iza.org/dp8154.pdf (accessed 24 May 2018).
31.
MatsaganisMOzdemirEWardT (2014) The coverage rate of social benefits. Social Situation Observatory. Income Distribution and Living Conditions Research note 9/2013. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at:http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=11523&langId=en (accessed 24 May 2018).
32.
McLaughlinEGlendinningC (1994) Paying the care in Europe: Is there a feminist approach? In: HantraisLMangenS (eds) Family Policy and the Welfare of Women. Loughborough: European Research Centre, pp. 67–82.
33.
MoodC (2010) Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review26(1): 67–82.
34.
MuffelsRFouargeD (2003) The role of European welfare states in explaining resources deprivation. Social Indicators Research68(3): 299–330.
35.
NelsonK (2012) Counteracting material deprivation: The role of social assistance in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy22(2): 148–163.
36.
NieuwenhuisRNeedAvan der KolkH (2012). Institutional and demographic explanations of women’s employment in 18 OECD countries, 1975–1999. Journal of Marriage and the Family74(3): 614–630.
37.
NolanBWhelanCT (2011) Poverty and Deprivation in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
NottenGGuioAC (2017) The impact of social transfers on income poverty and material deprivation. ImPRovE Working Paper No. 16/17. Antwerp: Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy. pp. 1–31. http://improve-research.eu/?wpdmact=process&did=MTQ4LmhvdGxpbms= (accessed 24 May 2018).
39.
RingenS (1988) Direct and indirect measures of poverty. Journal of Social Policy17(3): 351–365.
40.
SaltkjelTMalmberg-HeimonenI (2017) Welfare generosity in Europe: A multi-level study of material deprivation and income poverty among disadvantaged groups. Social Policy and Administration51(7): 1287–1310.
41.
ScruggsLAllanJ (2006). Welfare-state decommodification in 18 OECD-countries: A replication and revision. Journal of European Social Policy16(1): 55–72.
42.
SiegelNA (2005) When (only) money matters: the pros and cons of expenditure analysis. In: ClasenJSiegelNA (eds) Investigating Welfare State Change: The ‘Dependent Variable Problem’ in Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 43–71.
43.
SiegristJMarmotM (2006) Introduction. In: SiegristJMarmotM (eds) Social Inequalities in Health: New Evidences and Policy Implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–26.
44.
ThévenonO (2011) Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review37(1): 57–87.
45.
TillMEiffeF (2010) Progress of living conditions: A dynamic model of material deprivation for a European Society. In: AtkinsonTBMarlierE (eds) Income and Living Conditions in Europe. Luxembourg: EU, pp. 241–264.
46.
TownsendP (1979) Poverty in the UK. A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living. London: Lane.
47.
van KersbergenKVisB (2015) Three worlds’ typology: Moving beyond normal science?Journal of European Social Policy25(1): 111–123.
48.
VisB (2013) How to analyse welfare states and their development. In: GreveB (eds) The Routledge Handbook of the Welfare State. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 274–282.
49.
VisserMGesthuizenMScheepersP (2013) The impact of macro-economic circumstances and social protection expenditure on economic deprivation in 25 European Countries, 2007–2011. Social Indicators Research115: 1179–1203.
50.
WhelanBWhelanC (1995) In what sense is poverty multidimensional? In: RoomG (eds) Beyond the Threshold. The Measurement and Analysis of Social Exclusion. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 29–48.
51.
WhelanCLayteRMaitreB (2004) Understanding the mismatch between poverty and deprivation. European Sociological Review20(4): 287–302.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
