Towards formalisation: The organisation of work in the public and private sectors in Nordic countries

Abstract

According to European comparative studies, organisational change and restructuration have been especially prevalent in Nordic countries. In particular, public-sector organisations have been under turbulence due to pressures for cost reduction and increased efficiency. Yet, not much is known about how these changes have affected the organisation of everyday work. Based on the three waves of European Working Conditions surveys (2000, 2005, 2010), this paper analyses the change in the organisation of work in Nordic countries. The aim is to look into types of work organisation in public- and private-sector organisations in Sweden, Finland, and Denmark. The questions asked are how the type of work organisation differs between sectors and to what extent are there changes in the prevalence of work organisation types. According to the results, the trend is a move away from the use of forms of work organisation characterised by high levels of learning and autonomy to more constrained or formalised forms. However, differences were also found between countries and sectors. The formalisation of work (i.e. features characteristic especially of the lean model of work organisation) is more common in the public sector and in Finland and Denmark compared to Sweden.

Keywords

Work organisation Nordic countries lean production new public management comparative research work formalisation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldenderfer

Blashfield

(1984) Cluster Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.

Alvesson

Thompson

(2005) Postbureaucracy? In: Ackroyd

Batt

Thompson

et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Work and Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.485–507.

Appelbaum

Bailey

Berg

et al. (2000) Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.

Arundel

Lorenz

Lundvall

et al. (2007) How Europe’s economies learn: A comparison of work organization and innovation mode for the EU-15. Industrial and Corporate Change 16(6): 1175–1210.

Björkman

(2013) Management: Still a fashion industry. In: Sandberg

(ed) Nordic Lights: Work, Management and Welfare in Scandinavia. Stockholm: SNS Förlag, pp.91–125.

Bloom

Van Reenen

(2011) Human resource management and productivity. In: Card

Ashenfelter

(eds) Handbook of Labor Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp.1697–1767.

Bolin

Härenstam

(2008) An empirical study of bureaucratic and post-bureaucratic characteristics in 90 workplaces. Economic and Industrial Democracy 29(4): 541–564.

Brunsson

Sahlin-Andersson

(2000) Constructing organizations: The example of public sector reform. Organization Studies 21(4): 721–746.

Castells

(1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

10.

Emery

Giauque

(2005) Employment in the public and private sectors: Toward a confusing hybridization process. International Review of Administrative Sciences 71(4): 639–657.

11.

Eurofound (2008) Use of Technology and Working Conditions in the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

12.

Eurofound (2012) Fifth European Working Conditions Survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

13.

Eurofound (2013) Employment Polarisation and Job Quality in the Crisis: European Jobs Monitor 2013. Dublin: Eurofound.

14.

Eurofound (2014) Drivers of Recent Job Polarization and Upgrading in Europe. Dublin: Eurofound.

15.

Eurofound (2016) What Do Europeans Do at Work? A Task-Based Analysis. European Jobs Monitor 2016. Dublin: Eurofound.

16.

European Commission (1997) Partnership for a New Organisation of Work—Green Paper. Supplement 4/97 to the Bulletin of the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

17.

Greenacre

(2007) Correspondence Analysis in Practice. 2nd ed. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

18.

Hall

(1996) Organizations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes. 6th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

19.

Hall

(2013) NPM in Sweden: The risky balance between bureaucracy and politics. In: Sandberg

(ed) Nordic Lights: Work, Management and Welfare in Scandinavia. Stockholm: SNS Förlag, pp.406–419.

20.

Hebdon

Kirkpatrick

(2005) Changes in the organization of public services and their effect on employment relations. In: Ackroyd

Batt

Thompson

et al. (eds) Oxford Handbook of Work and Organization. New York: Oxford University press, pp.530–553.

21.

Heckscher

(1994) Defining the post-bureaucratic type. In: Heckscher

Donnellon

(eds) The Post-Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change. London: SAGE Publications, pp.14–62.

22.

Holm

Lorenz

(2015) Has “Discretionary Learning” declined during the Lisbon Agenda?: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of work organization in European nations. Industrial and Corporate Change 24(6): 1179–1214.

23.

Holm

Lorenz

Lundvall

et al. (2010) Organizational learning and systems of labor market regulation in Europe. Industrial and Corporate Change 19(4): 1141–1173.

24.

Hood

Dixon

(2015) A Government That Worked Better and Cost Less?: Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government. Oxford: OUP Oxford.

25.

Hood

Peters

(2004) The middle aging of new public management: Into the age of paradox? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14(3): 267–282.

26.

Hvidman

Calmar Andersen

(2014) The impact of performance management in public and private organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24(1): 35–58.

27.

Johnson

Wood

Brewster

(2009) The rise of post-bureaucracy: Theorists’ fancy or organizational praxis? International Sociology 24(1): 37–61.

28.

Kalleberg

(2001) Organizing flexibly: The flexible firm in a new century. British Journal of Industrial Relations 39(4): 479–504.

29.

Kapucu

(2006) New public management: Theory, ideology, and practice. In: Farazmand

Pinkowski

(eds) Handbook of Globalization, Governance, and Public Administration. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp.886–897.

30.

Kasvio

Gonäs

Skorstad

(2012) In search of the Nordic working life model: Introduction to the thematic issue. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 2(4): 1–19

31.

Lam

(2005) Organizational innovation. In: Fagerberg

Mowery

Nelson

(eds) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.115–147.

32.

Laursen

Gertsen

Johansen

(2003) Applying Lean Thinking in Hospitals: Exploring Implementation Difficulties. Aalborg: Aalborg University, Center for Industrial Production.

33.

Le Roux

Rouanet

(2010) Multiple Correspondence Analysis. London: SAGE Publications.

34.

Lorenz

Valeyre

(2005) Organisational innovation, human resource management and labour market structure: A comparison of the EU-15. Journal of Industrial Relations 47(4): 434–442.

35.

McSweeney

(2006) Are we living in a post-bureaucratic epoch? Journal of Organizational Change Management 19(1): 22–37.

36.

Maravelias

(2003) Post-bureaucracy control through professional freedom. Journal of Organizational Change Management 16(5): 547–566.

37.

Meagher

Szebehely

(eds) (2013) Marketisation in Nordic Eldercare: A Research Report on Legislation, Oversight, Extent and Consequences. Stockholm Studies in Social Work 30. Stockholm: Stockholm University.

38.

Mintzberg

(1983) Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

39.

Mood

(2010) Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review 26(1): 67–82.

40.

Morris

Farrell

(2007) The ‘post-bureaucratic’ public sector organization. New organizational forms and HRM in ten UK public sector organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 18(9): 1575–1588.

41.

Movitz

Sandberg

(2013) Contested models: Productive welfare and solidaristic individualism. In: Sandberg

(ed) Nordic Lights: Work, Management and Welfare in Scandinavia. Stockholm: SNS Förlag, pp.31–90.

42.

Radnor

Osborne

(2013) Lean: A failed theory for public services? Public Management Review 15(2): 265–287.

43.

Sederblad

(ed) (2013) Lean i Arbetslivet. Stockholm: Liber.

44.

Shalley

Gilson

(2004) What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly 15(1): 33–53.

45.

Torsteinsen

(2012) Why does post-bureaucracy lead to more formalisation? Local Government Studies 38(3): 321–344.

46.

Valeyre

Lorenz

Cartron

et al. (2009) Working Conditions in the European Union: Work Organisation. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.38 MB