Reflexivity theory can contribute in important ways to our understanding of how societies contend with climate change. Avoiding the catastrophic effects of “dangerous climate change” will require substantial change, yet emissions continue to rise. Social scientific research on climate change mitigation is dominated by a relatively small number of macro-theoretical frameworks, plus a rather large and disparate empirical literature on individual cognitions, attitudes and behaviors. We apply Archer’s reflexivity theory to a survey sample drawn from Alberta, Canada, showing that unique predispositions toward reflexivity offer strong predictors of willingness to engage in climate-related mitigative behaviors.
AdamBBeckUvan LoonJ (2004) The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory. London: Sage.
2.
AdgerNWDessaiSGouldenM. (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?Climatic Change93: 335–354.
3.
AkramSHoganA (2015) On reflexivity and the conduct of the self in everyday life: reflections on Bourdieu and Archer. The British Journal of Sociology66(4): 606–625.
4.
ArcherMS (2003) Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, Cambridge University Press.
5.
ArcherMS (ed.) (2010b) Conversations About Reflexivity: Ontological Explorations. London: Routledge.
6.
ArcherMS (2010a) Routine, reflexivity, and realism. Sociological Theory28(3): 272–303.
7.
ArcherMS (2007) Making Our Way Through the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
ArcherMS (1995) Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BeckU (2010) Climate for change, or how to create a Green Modernity?Theory, Culture and Society27(2–3): 254–266.
10.
BeckU (2009) World at Risk. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
11.
BeckUGiddensALashS (1994) Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition, and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
12.
BourdieuP (1998) Practical Reason: On the Theory of Social Action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
BourdieuP (1990) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
14.
ClementsB (2013) The sociological and attitudinal bases of environmentally-related beliefs and behaviour in Britain. Environmental Politics21(6): 901–921.
15.
CordanoMWelcomerSSchererRF. (2010) A cross-cultural assessment of three theories of pro-environmental behavior: A comparison between business students of Chile and the United States. Environment and Behavior43(5): 634–657.
16.
DavidsonDJ (2012) Analyzing social responses to climate change through the lens of reflexivity: An in-depth look at ‘climate change meta-reflexives. British Journal of Sociology63(4): 616–640.
17.
DavidsonDJHaanM (2012) Gender, political ideology, and climate change beliefs in an extractive industry community. Population and Environment34(2): 217–234.
18.
DietzTDanAShwomR (2007) Support for climate change policy: social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology72(2): 185–214.
19.
DietzTSternPCGuagnanoAG (1998) Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior30(4): 450–71.
20.
DonatiP (2011) Modernization and relational reflexivity. International Review of Sociology21(1): 21–39.
DunlapEMcCrightA (2011) Organized climate-change denial. In: DryzekJSNorgaardRBSchlosbergD (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford University Press, pp.144–160.
23.
DunlapRE (1998) Lay perceptions of global risk. International Sociology13(4): 473–98.
24.
DunlapREVan LiereKMertigAG. (2000) Measuring endorsement of the new eco-logical paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues56(3): 425–442.
25.
Environment Canada (2011) National Inventory Report 1990-2009: Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada. Available at: http://www.ec.gc.ca/Publications/ (accessed 12 October 2011).
26.
Eurobarometer (2008) Special Eurobarometer 300. Europeans’ Attitudes Towards Climate Change. Brussels: European Commission.
27.
FarrellJ (2012) Environmental activism and moral schemas: Cultural components of differential participation. Environment and Behavior45(3): 399–423.
28.
FarrugiaD (2013) The reflexive subject: Towards a theory of reflexivity as practical intelligibility. Current Sociology61(3): 283–300.
29.
FeldmanLMaibachEWRoser-RenoufC. (2012) Climate on cable: The nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. The International Journal of Press/Politics17(1): 3–31.
30.
GeorgeDMalleryP (2003) SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
31.
GiddensA (2009) The Politics of Climate Change, Cambridge. UK: Polity.
32.
GiddensA (2004 [1984]) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity.
33.
GiddensA(1991) Modernity and Self- identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
34.
GuberDL (2013) A cooling climate for change? Party polarization and the politics of global warming. American Behavioral Scientist57(1): 93–115
35.
HarelOZhouXH (2007) Multiple imputation: review of theory, implementation and software. Statistics in Medicine, 26(16): 3057–3077.
36.
HarvattJPettsJChilversJ (2011) Understanding householder responses to natural hazards: flooding and sea-level rise comparisons. Journal of Risk Research14(1): 63–83.
37.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2013) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis; Summary for Policymakers. In: StockerTF. (eds) Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
IvanovaGTranterB (2008) Paying for environmental protection in a cross-national perspective. Australian Journal of Political Science43(2): 169–188.
39.
JoiremanJTrueloveHBDuellB (2010) Effect of outdoor temperature, heat primes and anchoring on belief in global warming. Journal of Environmental Psychology30: 358–367.
40.
KahnemanDSlovicPTverskyA (eds) (1982) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
KellstedtPMZahranSVedlitzA (2008) Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Analysis28(1): 113–26.
KollmussAAgyemanJ (2002) Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?Environmental Education Research8(3): 239–260.
44.
KuuselaP (2012) Review: Margaret S. Archer (ed.): Conversations about reflexivity. Acta Sociologica55: 92–94.
45.
KvaløyBFinseraasHListhaugO (2012) The publics’ concern for global warming: A cross-national study of 47 countries. Journal of Peace Research49(1): 11–22.
46.
LaidleyTM (2013) Climate, class and culture: political issues as cultural signifiers in the US. The Sociological Review61: 153–171.
47.
LaidleyTM (2011) The influence of social class and cultural variables on environmental behaviors: Municipal-level evidence from Massachusetts. Environment and Behavior45(2): 170–197.
48.
LeiserowitzA (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery and values. Climatic Change, 77: 45–72.
49.
LiuJHSibleyCG (2011) Hope for the future? Understanding self-sacrifice among young citizens of the world in the face of global warming. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy12(1): 190–203.
50.
MaibachERoser-RenoufCLeiserowitzA (2009) Global Warming’s Six Americas 2009: An Audience Segmentation Analysis. Yale Project on Climate Change; George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication. Available at: http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/05/pdf/6americas.pdf.
51.
MarkowitzEMBowermanT (2012) How much is enough? Examining the public’s beliefs about consumption. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy12(1): 167–189.
52.
McCrightA (2010) The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Population and Environment32(1): 66–87.
53.
McCrightADunlapRE (2011b) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American Public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly52: 155–194.
54.
McCrightADunlapRE (2011a) Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change21:1163–1172.
55.
NorgaardK (2011) Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions and Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56.
OregSKatz-GerroT (2006) Predicting pro-environmental behavior cross-nationally: Values, the theory of planned behavior, and value-belief norm theory. Environment and Behavior38: 462–483.
57.
SayerA (2010) Reflexivity and the habitus. In: ArcherM (ed.) Conversations about Reflexivity. London and New York: Routledge: 109–122.
58.
ScannellLGiffordR (2012) Personally relevant climate change: The role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment and Behavior45(1): 60–85
59.
SchwomRBidwellDDanA. (2010) Understanding U.S. public support for domestic climate change policies. Global Environmental Change20: 472–482.
60.
SherkatDEEllisonCG (2007) Structuring the religion-environment connection: identifying religious influences on environmental concern and activism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion46(1): 71–85.
61.
ShoveEPantzarMWatsonM (2012) The Dynamics of Social Practice. Everyday Life and How it Changes. London: Sage.
62.
ShoveE (2010) Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A42: 1273–1285.
StedmanRCDavidsonDJWellsteadAM (2004) Risk and climate change: perceptions of key policy actors in Canada. Risk Analysis24(5): 1393–1404.
65.
SternPCDietzTAbelT. (1999) A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review6(2): 81–97.
66.
UrryJ (2011) Climate Change and Society. Polity Press.
67.
WalklateSMythenG (2010) Agency, reflexivity and risk: Cosmopolitan, neurotic or prudential citizen?British Journal of Sociology61(1): 45–61.
68.
WeberEUSternPC (2011) Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist66(4): 315–328.
69.
WhitmarshL (2008) Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. Journal of Risk Research11(3): 351–74.
70.
YuanYC (2010) Multiple imputation for missing data: Concepts and new development (Version 9.0). SAS Institute Inc, Rockville, MD, 49.
71.
ZahranSKimEChenX. (2007) Ecological development and global climate change: a cross-national study of Kyoto protocol ratification. Society and Natural Resources20: 37–55.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
