To provide a better understanding of mobile phones as a recruitment tool in collective actions, this study explores the use of mobile phones for mobilizing protest in China. Using in-depth interviews and investigating four cases in which Chinese people employed mobile devices to recruit participants for protests, this study observes that mobile communication in China embodies guanxi, the indigenous social tie in Chinese society that introduces reciprocity as an influential facilitator of collective actions. The embedment of reciprocity facilitates the proliferation of mobilizing calls, legitimizes mobilizing appeals, generates obligations and consolidates solidarity for collective actions. The study concludes with a consideration of the relevance of mobile phones for the embedment of reciprocity in social ties in the mobilization of collective action in authoritarian regimes such as China.
BennettWL (2003) Communicating global activism. Information, Communication & Society6(2): 143–168.
4.
BennettWLSegerbergA (2012) The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society15(5): 739–768.
5.
BennettWLBreunigCGivensT (2008) Communication and political mobilization. Political Communication25(3): 269–289.
6.
BimberBFlanaginAStohlC. (2012) Collective Action in Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BondMHHwangKK (1986) The social psychology of Chinese people. In: BondMH (ed.) The Psychology of the Chinese People. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 213–266.
8.
BondesMSchucherG (2014) Derailed emotions. Information, Communication & Society17(1): 45–65.
FriedmanDMcAdamD (1992) Collective identity and activism. In: MorrisADMuellerCM (eds) Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp.156–173.
22.
GogginGHjorthL. (2014) The Routledge Companion to Mobile Media. London: Routledge.
23.
GoldTGuthrieDWankD (2002) Social Connections in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
GouldRV (2003) Why do networks matter? In: DianiMMcAdamD (eds) Social Movements and Networks. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 234–257.
25.
GouldnerAW (1960) The norm of reciprocity. American Sociological Review25(2): 161–178.
26.
HowardPNHussainMM (2013) Democracy’s Fourth Wave?New York: Oxford University Press.
HussainMMHowardPN (2013) What best explains successful protest cascades?International Studies Review15(1): 48–66.
29.
HwangK-k (1987) Face and favor. American Journal of Sociology92(4): 945–947.
30.
JasperJM. (1998) The emotions of protest. Sociological Forum13(3): 397–424.
31.
KatzJEAakhusM (2002) Perpetual Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
KipnisAB (1997) Producing Guanxi. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
33.
KingGPanJRobertsME (2013) How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review107(2): 1–18.
34.
LanYZhangY (2007) Millions of Xiamen residents spread crazily the same SMS to against high-pollution project. Southern Metropolis Daily29 May p. A4.
35.
LingRS (2004) The Mobile Connection. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
36.
LingRS (2008) New Tech, New Ties. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
37.
LingRSYttriB. (2002) Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway. In: KatzJAakhusM (eds) Perpetual Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 139–169.
38.
LiuJ (2013a) Mobile communication, popular protests and citizenship in China. Modern Asian Studies47(3): 995–1018.
39.
LiuJ (2013b) Mobilized by mobile media – How Chinese people use mobile phones to change politics and democracy. PhD Thesis, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
40.
LiuJ (2015) Communicating beyond information. Television & New Media16(6): 503–520.
41.
MaJ (2008) Weng’an officials organize teachers to dispel online rumors and provide ‘full company’ during interviews. Youth Weekend17 June p. A12.
42.
McAdamD (1986) Recruitment to high-risk activism. The American Journal of Sociology92(1): 64–90.
43.
McAdamD (1988) Micromobilization contexts and recruitment to activism. International Social Movement Research1: 125–154.
44.
McAdamDSidneyTarrowTillyC (1996) To map contentious politics. Mobilization1(1): 17–34.
45.
MerceaD (2012) Digital prefigurative participation. New Media & Society14(1): 153–169.
46.
NeumayerCStaldG (2014) The mobile phone in street protest. Mobile Media & Communication2(2): 117–133.
47.
ParkSHLuoY (2001) Guanxi and organizational dynamics. Strategic Management Journal22(5): 455–477.
48.
PassyF (2003) Social networks matter. But how? In: DianiMMcAdamD (eds) Social Movements and Networks. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 21–48.
49.
PutnamRD (2000) Bowling Alone, London: Simon & Schuster.
50.
RafaelVL (2003) The cell phone and the crowd. Popular Culture15(3): 399–425.
51.
RheingoldH (2002) Smart Mobs. Cambridge: Perseus.
52.
RheingoldH (2008) Mobile media and political collective action. In KatzJ (ed.) Handbook of Mobile Communication Studies. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 225–240.
