In current research, the extensive family policies of the Scandinavian countries have been problematized and described as hampering women’s careers. However, mechanisms have been little investigated and the Scandinavian countries are often regarded as a single policy model. Based on an account of institutional variety we study gender gaps in hourly wages and access to authority positions in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden and explore the importance of segregation, skills and work interruptions. The analysis uses pooled cross-sectional data from the European Social Survey (ESS) for 2004 and 2010. The results show that gender gaps vary both in size and regarding the mechanisms producing them. In particular, we find that gender segregation has a radically different impact in the four countries. The analysis suggests that the mechanisms linking family policies to labour market outcomes are more complex than envisaged in the current debate and point to the importance of comparing seemingly similar countries.
AbendrothA-KMaasIvan der LippeT (2013) Human capital and the gender gap in authority in European countries. European Sociological Review29: 261–273.
2.
AllisonP (1999) Multiple Regression. A Primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
3.
BihagenENermoMSternL (2014) The gender gap in the business elite: Stability and change in characteristics of Swedish top wage earners in large private companies, 1993–2007. Acta Sociologica57: 119–133.
4.
BlauFKahnL (2003) Understanding the international differences in the gender pay gap. Journal of Labour Economics21: 106–44.
5.
BoyeKHalldénKMagnussonC (2016) Stagnation only on the surface? The implications of skill and family responsibilities for the gender wage gap in Sweden, 1974–2010. British Journal of Sociology, forthcoming.
6.
CharlesMGruskyDB (eds) (2004) Occupational Ghettos. The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
DuncanODDuncanB (1955) A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. American Sociological Review20: 210–217.
8.
DuvanderAZLammi-TaskulaJ (2011) Parental leave. In GislasonIVBjörk EydalG (eds) Parental Leave Childcare and Gender Equality in the Nordic Countries. TemaNord, Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, p. 562.
9.
EdlundJÖunI (2016) Who should work and who should care? Attitudes towards the desirable division of labour between mothers and fathers in five European countries. Acta Sociologica59: 151–169.
10.
EnglandP (1992) Comparable Worth. Theories and Evidence. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
11.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
Estévez-AbeM (2005) Gender bias in skills and social policies: The varieties of capitalism perspectives on sex segregation. Social Politics12: 180–215.
13.
Estévez-AbeM (2006) Gendering the varieties of capitalism: A study of occupational segregation by sex in advanced industrial countries. World Politics59: 142–175.
14.
Estévez-AbeMIversenTSoskiceD (2001) Social protection and the formation of skills: A reinterpretation of the welfare state. In HallPASoskiceD (eds) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
GashV (2009) Sacrificing their careers for their families? An analysis of the penalty to motherhood in Europe. Social Indicators Research93: 569–586.
16.
GislasonIVBjörk EydalG (2011) Parental Leave, Childcare and Gender Equality in the Nordic Countries. TemaNord Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, p. 562.
17.
GoughMNoonanM (2013) A review of the motherhood wage penalty in the United States. Sociology Compass7: 328–342.
18.
GrönlundA (2012) On-the-job training – a mechanism for segregation? Examining the relationship between gender, occupation, and on-the-job training investments. European Sociological Review28: 408–420.
19.
HallPSoskiceD (2001) Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
HalldénK (2011) What’s Sex Got To Do With It? Women and Men in European Labour Markets. Swedish Institute for Social Research Dissertation Series Number 85. Stockholm University, Sweden.
21.
HalldénK (2014) Könssegregering efter yrke på den svenska arbetsmarknaden år 2000–2010. In KunzeAThorburnK (eds) Yrke, Karriär och Lön - Kvinnors och Mäns Olika Villkor på den Svenska Arbetsmarknaden, Forskningsantologi till Delegationen för jämställdhet i arbetslivet, SOU, Stockholm: Fritzes, p. 81.
22.
KorpiW (2000) Faces of inequality: Gender, class, and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Social Politics7: 127–191.
23.
MandelH (2012) Winners and losers: The consequences of welfare state policies for gender wage inequality. European Sociological Review28: 241–262.
24.
MandelHSemyonovM (2005) Family policies, wage structures, and gender gaps: Source of earnings inequality in 20 countries. American Sociological Review70: 949–967.
25.
MandelHSemyonovM (2006) A welfare state paradox: State interventions and women’s employment opportunities in 22 countries. American Journal of Sociology111: 1910–1949.
26.
MandelHShalevM (2009) Gender, class, and the varieties of capitalism perspective. Social Politics16: 161–181.
PedersenE (2014) Med Staten i Ryggen – Institusjonelle Rammebetingelser og Unge Voksnes Overveielser om å Få Barn. Doktorsavhandling vid en samfunnsvitenskapelige fakultet No 490. Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo.
31.
PetersenTPennerAHogsnesG (2014) From motherhood penalties to husband premia: The new challenge for gender equality and family policy, lessons from Norway. American Journal of Sociology, 119:1434–1472.
32.
PolachekS (1981) Occupational self selection: A human capital approach to sex differences in occupation structure. Review of Economics and Statistics58: 60–69.
33.
RuberyJBettioFFaganCMaierFQuackSVillaP (1997) Payment structures and gender pay differentials: Some societal effects. The International Journal of Human Resource Management8: 131–149.
34.
SaracenoC (1997) Family change, family policies and the restructuring of welfare. In OECD (publisher) Family Market and Community: Equity and Efficiency in Social Policy. Social Policy Studies Number 21. Paris: OECD.
35.
TamT (1997) Sex segregation and occupational gender inequality in the United States: Devaluation or specialized training?American Journal of Sociology6: 1652–1692.
36.
ThevenonO (2011) Family policies in the OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review37: 57–87.
37.
Tomaskovic-DeveyDSkaggsS (2003) Sex segregation, labour process organization and gender earnings inequality. American Journal of Sociology108: 102–128.
Wennemo LanningerASundströmM (2014) Part-time work in the Nordic region: Part-time work, gender and economic distribution in the Nordic countries. TemaNord2014:503. Available at: http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:707663/FULLTEXT01.pdf (accessed 12 July 2016).
40.
WooldridgeJM (2009) Introductory Econometrics. A Modern Approach, fourth edition. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
