Globalization with its many side-effects on working life is seen to pose accentuated risks especially for women and low skilled workers – resulting in increasing polarization of job quality. In contrast to “universal theories”, institutional theories claim changes in work life might vary according to the institutional and cultural frameworks which mediate the global pressures of change. This study analyses job quality trends in Finland at the intersection of class and gender. The results, based on the Finnish Quality of Work Life survey (1977–2013), find no clear evidence of polarization. In line with the institutional theory’s prediction of a low risk of polarization in coordinated and inclusive Nordic countries, improvements have occurred for blue-collar workers in terms of autonomy and opportunities for development at work, reducing the gap between social classes. Furthermore, the negative sides of work life, such as insecurity and time pressures have become common experiences regardless of social class. The ‘welfare state paradox’ hypothesis on the comparative disadvantage of women in higher positions in the labour market does not gain support in 2013: the upper-white collar women have attained roughly similar levels of job quality to their male counterparts.
ClarkA (2005) Your money or your life: changing job quality in OECD countries. British Journal of Industrial Relations43(3): 377–400.
2.
CookeL (2011) Gender–Class Equality in Political Economies. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
3.
DieckhoffMGashVSteiberN (2015) Measuring the effect of institutional change on gender inequality in the labour market. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility39(1): 59–75.
4.
DwyerR (2013) The care economy? Gender, economic restructuring and job polarization in the U.S. labor market. American Sociological Review78(3): 390–416.
5.
EdlundJGrönlundA (2008) Protection of mutual interests? Employment protection and skill formation in different labour market regimes. European Journal of Industrial Relations14(3): 245–264.
6.
EllingsæterA-L (2013) Scandinavian welfare states and gender (de) segregation: recent trends and processes. Economic and Industrial Democracy34(3): 501–518.
7.
ElvanderN (2002) The labour market regimes in the Nordic countries: a comparative analysis. Scandinavian Political Studies25(2): 117–137.
8.
EmslieCHuntKMacintyreS (1999) ‘Gender’ or ‘job’ differences? Working conditions amongst men and women in white-collar occupations. Work, Employment & Society13(4): 711–729.
9.
EsserIOlsenK (2012) Perceived job quality: autonomy and job security within a multi-level framework. European Sociological Review28(4): 443–454.
10.
Estévez-AbeM (2005) Gender bias in skills and social policies: the varieties of capitalism perspective on sex segregation. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society12(2): 180–215.
11.
Estévez-AbeM (2009) Gender, inequality, and capitalism: the ‘varieties of capitalism’ and women. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society16(2): 182–191.
12.
Eurofound (2013) Employment Polarisation and Job Quality in the Crisis: European Jobs Monitor 2013. Dublin, Ireland: Eurofound.
13.
EvertssonMEnglandPMooi-ReciI. (2009) Is gender inequality greater at lower or higher educational levels? Common patterns in the Netherlands, Sweden and the United States. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society16(2): 210–210.
14.
FeldstedAGallieDGreenF. (2007) Skills at Work, 1986 to 2006. Oxford, UK: ESRC Centre on Skills, Knowledge and Organisational Performance.
15.
Fernández-MacíasEHurleyJStorrieD (eds) (2012) Transformation of the Employment Structure in the EU and USA, 1995–2007. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
GallieD (2002) The quality of working life in welfare strategy. In: Esping-AndersenG. (eds) Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp.96–129.
17.
GallieD (2003) The quality of working life: is Scandinavia different?European Sociological Review19(1): 61–79.
18.
GallieDFelsteadAGreenF (2004) Changing patterns of task discretion in Britain. Work, Employment & Society18(2): 243–266.
19.
GallieD (2007a) Production regimes, employment regimes and the quality of work. In: GallieD (ed.) Employment Regimes and the Quality of Work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp.1–34.
20.
GallieD (2007b) Task discretion and job quality. In: GallieD (ed.) Employment Regimes and the Quality of Work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp.105–136.
21.
GallieD (ed.) (2007c) Employment Regimes and the Quality of Work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
GallieD (ed.) (2013) Economic Crisis, Quality of Work & Social Integration: The European Experience. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23.
GashVInancH (2013) Insecurity and the peripheral workforce. In: GallieD (ed.) Economic Crisis, Quality of Work & Social Integration: The European Experience. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp.142–168.
24.
GoosMManningA (2007) Lousy and lovely jobs: the rising polarization of work in Britain. The Review of Economics and Statistics89(1): 118–133.
25.
GreenF (2006) Demanding Work: The Paradox of Job Quality in the Affluent Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
GreenF (2013) Skills and Skilled Work: An Economic and Social Analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
GreenFMostafaTParent-ThirionA. (2013) Is job quality becoming more unequal?Industrial & Labor Relations Review66(4): 753–784.
28.
GreenFFelsteadAGallieD. (2016a) The declining volume of workers’ training in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations54(2): 422–448.
29.
GreenFFelsteadAGallieD. (2016b) Skills and work organisation in Britain: a quarter century of change. Journal for Labour Market Research. First Online: 15 February 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s12651-016-0197-x.
30.
GustavsenB (2007) Work organization and ‘the Scandinavian Model’. Economic and Industrial Democracy28(4): 650–671.
31.
HakimC (2000) Work-lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
HallPSoskiceD (2001) An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. In: HallPSoskiceD (eds) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp.1–68.
HäusermannSKurerTSchwanderH (2015) High-skilled outsiders? Labor market vulnerability, education and welfare state preferences. Socio-Economic Review13(2): 235–258.
35.
HellevikO (2009) Linear versus logistic regression when the dependent variable is a dichotomy. Quality and Quantity43(1): 59–74.
36.
HolmanD (2013a) Job types and job quality in Europe. Human Relations66(4): 475–502.
37.
HolmanD (2013b) An explanation of cross-national variation in call centre job quality using institutional theory. Work, Employment, & Society27(1): 21–38.
38.
KallebergA (2011) Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
39.
KorpiW (2000) Faces of inequality: gender, class, and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society7(2): 127–191.
40.
KorpiW (2006) Power resources and employer-centered approaches in explanations of welfare states and varieties of capitalism: protagonists, consenters and antagonists. World Politics58(2): 167–206.
41.
LempiäinenK (2015) Precariousness in academia: the prospects of employment in changing universities. In: PortaDHänninenSSiisiäinenM. (eds) The New Social Division: Making and Unmaking Precariousness. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.123–138.
42.
MandelH (2012) Winners and losers: the consequences of welfare state policy for gender wage inequality. European Sociological Review28(2): 241–262.
43.
MandelHSemyonovM (2006) A welfare state paradox: state interventions and women’s employment opportunities in 22 countries. American Journal of Sociology111(6): 1910–1949.
44.
MandelHShalevM (2009a) Gender, class, and varieties of capitalism. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society16(2): 161–181.
45.
MandelHShalevM (2009b) How welfare states shape the gender pay gap: a theoretical and comparative analysis. Social Forces87(4): 1873–1911.
46.
McCallL (2001) Complex Inequality: Gender, Class and Race in the New Economy. New York, NY: Routledge.
47.
McBrideAHebsonGHolgateJ (2015) Intersectionality: are we taking enough notice in the field of work and employment relations?Work, Employment and Society29(2): 331–341.
48.
MoodC (2010) Logistic regression: why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review26(1): 67–82.
49.
MulinariPSelbergR (2013) Intersectional directions in working life research: a proposal. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies3(3): 81–98.
50.
Muñoz de BustilloRFernández-MacíasEAntónJ-I. (2011) Measuring More than Money: The Social Economics of Job Quality. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
51.
OinasTAnttilaTMustosmäkiA. (2012) The Nordic difference: job quality in Europe 1995–2010. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies2(4): 135–152.
52.
OlsenKKallebergANesheimT (2010) Perceived job quality in the United States, Great Britain, Norway and West Germany, 1989–2005. European Journal of Industrial Relations16(3): 221–240.
53.
OstermanP (2013) Introduction to the Special Issue on Job Quality: what does it mean and how might we think about It?Industrial & Labor Relations Review66(4): 739–752.
54.
PääkkönenHHanifiR (2011) Ajankäytön muutokset 2000-luvulla [Changes in Time Use]. Helsinki: Statistics Finland [in Finnish].
55.
RuberyJ (2011) Towards a gendering of the labour market regulation debate. Cambridge Journal of Economics35(6): 1103–1126.
56.
ScottJ (2006) Family and Gender Roles: How Attitudes are Changing. GeNet Working Paper No. 21 September 2006. Available at: http://www.genet.ac.uk/workpapers/GeNet2006p21.pdf (accessed 16 November 2015).
57.
SenguptaSEdwardsPKTsaiC-J (2009) The good, the bad, and the ordinary: work identities in ‘good’ and ‘bad’ jobs in the United Kingdom. Work and Occupations36(1): 26–55.
58.
SolheimELeiulfsrudH (2015) A European analysis of subsistence precarization and precarious risk. In: PortaDHänninenSSiisiäinenM. (eds) The New Social Division: Making and Unmaking Precariousness. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.63–82.
59.
SoskiceD (2005) Varieties of capitalism and cross-national gender differences. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society12(2): 170–179.
60.
StierHYaishM (2014) Occupational segregation and gender inequality in job quality: a multi-level approach. Work, Employment & Society28(2): 225–246.
61.
StierH (2015) The skill-divide in job quality: a cross-national analysis of 28 countries. Social Science Research49(1): 70–80.
TåhlinM (2007) Skills and wages in European labour markets: structure and change. In: GallieD (ed.) Employment Regimes and the Quality of Work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp.35–76.
65.
YaishMStierH (2009) Gender inequality in job authority: a cross-national comparison of 26 countries. Work and Occupations36(4): 343–366.
66.
WebbJ (2010) Gender and post-industrial shift. In: ScottJCromptonRLyonetteC (eds) Gender Inequalities in the 21st Century: New Barriers and Continuing Constraints. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 85–108.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
