BerkenkotterC.HuckinT. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication.Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
3.
BolterJ. D. (1991). Writing Space. The Computer, Hypertext and the History of Writing.Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.{2a edición revisada: Writing Space: Computers, Hypertext, and the Remediation of Print.Mahwah, NJ: LEA, 2001}.
4.
CrystalD. (2001). Language and the Internet.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
ChartierR. (1999). Cultura escrita, literatura e historia. Conversaciones con Roger Chartier.México, D. F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
6.
FerreiroE (2001). Pasado y presente de los verbos leer y es cribir.México, D. F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
7.
HandaC. (2001). Digital literacy and rethoric: A selected bibliography.Computers and Composition, 18 (2), 195–202.
8.
HylandK. (2002.) Teaching and Researching Writing.Londres: Longman.
9.
IPCT-J. Interpersonal Computing and Technology Journal. Association of Educational Communication and Technology. http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/∼ipct-j/
10.
JCMC, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. On the Web Quarterly Since June, 1995. http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/
Reading Online. A Journal of K-12 practice and research. International Reading Association, Inc. www.readingonline.org
17.
ShetzerH.WarschauerM. (2000). An electronic literacy approach to network-based language teaching. En WarschauerM.KernR. (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 171–185). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
SwalesJ. M. (1990). Genre Analysis. English in academic and research settings.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.