El presente trabajo pretende analizar los procesos de creación y ruptura del contrato psicológico en los grupos. Entendemos que estos procesos están ligados a los procesos de autorregulación grupal como la percepción de eficacia grupal, el compromiso, la satisfacción o las metas y expectativas grupales. Ahondando en este objetivo, pretendemos analizar el efecto de la ruptura del contrato psicológico en grupos de trabajo. Concretamente, tratamos de comparar los procesos de autorregulación a nivel individual (66 participantes) y grupal (43 grupos, 129 participantes) ante el desarrollo y la ruptura del contrato psicológico creado por el feedback negativo dado ante el desempeño logrado. Igualmente se pretende contrastar el rendimiento logrado a nivel individual y grupal. Los resultados muestran que en las fases iniciales, donde se desarrolla el contrato de grupo y las normas sociales, tanto los procesos autorreguladores como los resultados logrados son claramente favorables al grupo. Sin embargo, ante un feedback negativo continuado que implica la ruptura del contrato, el individuo mantiene una mayor confianza en su capacidad para afrontar la situación de lo que lo hace el grupo.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlcoverC. M. (2002). El contrato psicológico. El componente implícito de las relaciones laborales.Málaga: Ediciones Aljibe.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.Nueva York: Freeman and Company.
5.
BanduraA. (1998). Personal and collective efficacy in human adaptation and change. EnAdairJ. G.BelangerD.DionK. L. (Eds.), Advances in Psychological Science (pp. 51–72). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press Ltd.
6.
BanduraA. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 75–78.
7.
BanduraA.CervoneD. (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1017–1028.
8.
BanduraA.CervoneD. (1986). Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 38, 92–113.
9.
BeckerH. S. (1960). Notes of concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32–42.
10.
CervoneD.WoodR. (1995). Goals, feedback, and the differential influence of self-regulatory processes on cognitively complex performance. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 519–545.
11.
EarleyP. C. (1993). East meets West meets Mildest: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 319–348.
12.
EarleyP. C. (1994). Self or group? Cultural effects of training on self-efficacy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 89–117.
13.
ForgasJ. P. (2000). Introduction: The role of affect in social cognition. EnForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Feeling and Thinking. The Role of Affect in Social Cognition (pp. 1–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
FreseM. (1995). Error management in training: Conceptual and empirical results. EnZucchermaglioC.BagnaraS.StuckyS. U. (Eds.), Organizational Learning and Technological Change (pp. 112–124). Nueva York: Springer.
15.
GuestD. E.ConwayN. (2001). The impact of organizational change on HRM and psychological contracts.10th European Congress on Work and Organizational Psychology. Praga, 16–19 de mayo.
16.
HallD. T.MossJ. E. (1998). The new protean career contract: Helping organizations and employees adapt. Organizational Dynamics, 26, 22–37.
17.
HallierJ.JamesP. (1997). Middle managers and the employee psychological contract: agency, protection, and advancement. Journal of Management Studies, 34 (5), 703–728.
18.
HiltropJ. M. (1996). Managing the changing psychological contract. Employee Relations, 18 (1), 20–36.
19.
HinszV. B.TindaleR. S.VollrathD. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121 (1), 43–64.
20.
HodgesL.CarronA. V. (1992). Collective efficacy and group performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23, 48–59.
21.
KesslerI.ShapiroJ. (1998). Reestructuring the employment relationship in Surrey County Council. Employee Relations, 20, 365–382.
22.
LindsleyD. H.BrassD. J.ThomasJ. B. (1995). Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 20, 645–678.
23.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation.American Psychologist, 57, 705–717.
24.
MakinP. J.CooperC. L.CoxC. J. (1996). Organizations and the Psychological Contract. Managing People at Work.Wesport, CT: Praeger.
25.
Mcfarlane ShoreL. M.TetrickL. E. (1994). The psychological contract as an explanatory framework in the employment relationship. EnCooperC. L.RousseauD. M. (Eds.), Trends in Organizational Behaviour, vol. 1 (pp. 91–109). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
26.
MischelW.ShodaY. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.
27.
MischelW.ShodaY. (1998). Reconciling processing dynamics and personality dispositions. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 229–258.
28.
MorrisonE. W.RobinsonS. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22, 226–256.
29.
NadlerD. A.TushmanM. L. (1999). The organization of the future: Strategic imperatives and core competencies for the 21st century. Organizational Dynamics, 28 (1), 45–60.
30.
OrtonyA.CloreG.CollinsA. (1988). The Cognitive Structure of Emotions.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
ParkerL. E. (1994). Working together: Perceived self- and collective-efficacy at the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 43–59.
32.
PrussiaG. E.KinickiA. J. (1996). A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 187–198.
33.
RobinsonS. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574–599.
34.
RobinsonS. L.MorrisonE. W. (2000). The development of psychological contract breach and violation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 21, 525–546.
35.
RobinsonS.L.RousseauD.M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 15, 245–259.
36.
RousseauD. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Rights and Responsibilities Journal, 2, 121–139.
37.
RousseauD. M. (1995). Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
RousseauD. M.Mclean ParksJ. (1993). The contracts of individuals and organizations. EnCummingsL. L.StawB. M. (Eds.), Research and Organizational Behaviour, vol. 15 (pp. 1–43). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
39.
ScheinE. H. (1965). Organizational Psychology.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
StilesP.GrattonL.TrussC.Hope-HaileyV.McgovernP. (1996). Performance management and the psychological contract. Human Resource Management Journal, 7, 57–66.
42.
TaberneroC. (1998). Comparación social con el estereotipo de edad y concepción de capacidad como generadores de autoeficacia. Tesis Doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca.
43.
TaberneroC.ChambelM. J.CurralL. (2003). Desarrollo y ruptura del contrato psicológico en grupos de trabajo.VIII Congreso Nacional de Psicología Social. Málaga, 9–11 de abril, 2003.
44.
TaberneroC.WoodR. E. (1999). Implicit Theories versus the Social Construal of Ability in Self-Regulation and Performance on a Complex Task. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 78, 104–127.
45.
WongP. T.WeinerB. (1981). When people ask “why” questions and the heuristics of attributional search. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 650–663.
46.
WoodR. E. (1986). Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 37, 60–82.
47.
WoodR. E.BaileyT. (1985). Some answered questions about goal effect: A recommended change in research methods. Australian Journal of Management, 10, 61–73.
48.
WoodR. E.BanduraA. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14, 361–383.
49.
WoodR. E.George-FalvyJ.DebowskiS. (2001). Motivation and information search on complex tasks. EnErezM.KleinbeckU.ThierryH. (Eds.), Work Motivation in the Context of a Globalizing Economy (pp. 27–49). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
