Algunas investigaciones señalan que el apego al lugar afecta a la percepción del entorno, mientras que otras indican que es la percepción del lugar, especialmente la restauración percibida, la que produce niveles de apego diferentes. Asimismo, se ha observado que tanto la percepción del entorno como el apego al lugar influyen sobre la calidad de vida. Sin embargo, pocos trabajos analizan el peso conjunto del apego al lugar y la capacidad restauradora percibida sobre la calidad de vida. En este trabajo se pone a prueba la relación entre el apego al lugar, la capacidad restauradora que se le otorga al lugar y la calidad de vida en un pueblo rural de Tenerife. El modelo de vías obtenido indica que la calidad de vida recibe influencia tanto del apego al lugar como de la restauración percibida, y que el apego influye sobre la percepción de restauración del lugar.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbott-ChapmanJ. (2006). Time out in ‘green retreats’& adolescent wellbeing.Youth Studies Australia, 25, 9–16.
2.
BakerD. A.PalmerR. J. (2006). Examining the effects of perceptions of community and recreation participation on quality of life.Social Indicators Research, 75, 395–418.
3.
BermanM. G.JonidesJ.KaplanS. (2008). Cognitive benefits of interacting with nature.Psychological Science, 19, 1207–1212.
4.
BilligM. (2006). Is my home my castle? Place attachment, risk perception, and religious faith.Environment and Behavior, 38, 248–265.
5.
BonaiutoM.BreakwellG. M.CanoI. (1996). Identity Processes and Environmental Threat: the Effects of Nationalism and Local Identity upon Perception of Beach Pollution.Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 6, 157–175.
6.
BrownB. B.PerkinsD.BrownG. (2003). Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: Individual and block levels of analysis.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 259–271.
7.
BrownB. B.PerkinsD.BrownG. (2004). Incivilities, place attachment and crime: Block and individual effects.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 359–371.
8.
CorralizaJ. A.ColladoS. (2011). La naturaleza cercana como moderadora del estrés infantil.Psicothema, 23, 221–226.
9.
HartigT.StaatsH. (2006). The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 215–226.
10.
HernándezB.HidalgoM. C. (2005). Effect of urban vegetation on psychological restorativeness.Psychological Reports, 96, 1025–1028.
11.
HernandezB.HidalgoM. C.Salazar-LaplaceM. E.HessS. (2007). Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 310–319.
12.
Hernández-fernaudE.HernándezB.RuizA.RodríguezA.BetancorV. (2008). Impacto de las alteraciones dermatológicas de baja expresión en función del nivel de especificidad de la calidad de vida.Psicothema, 20, 273–278.
13.
HidalgoM. C.BertoR.GalindoM. P.GetreviA. (2006). Identifying attractive and unattractive urban places: categories, restorativeness and aesthetic attributes.Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano, 7, 115–133.
14.
HidalgoM. C.HernándezB. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 273–281.
15.
KaplanR.KaplanS. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A psychological perspective.Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
KorpelaM. K.HartigT. (1996). Restorative qualities of favourite places.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 221–233.
17.
KorpelaK. M.YlenM.TyrväinenL.SilvennoinenH. (2009). Stability of selfreported favorite places and place attachment over a 10-month period.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 95–100.
18.
LagrangeR. L.FerraroK. F.SupancicM. (1992). Perceived risk and fear of crime: Role of social and physical incivilities.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 311–334.
19.
LowS. M.AltmanI. (1992). Place Attachment. A conceptual inquiry. EnAltmanI.LowS. M., Place Attachment. Human Behavior and Environment. Advances in Theory and Research (Vol. 12, pp. 1–12). Nueva York: Plenum Press.
20.
McguireK. B. (1997). The reliability and validity of a questionnaire describing neighborhood characteristics relevant to families and young children living in urban areas.Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 551–566.
21.
MeschG. S.ManorO. (1998). Social ties, environmental perception, and local attachment.Environment and Behavior, 30, 504–519.
22.
OlivaA.AntolínL.EstévezR. M.PascualD. M. (2012). Activos del Barrio y Ajuste Adolescente.Psychosocial Intervention, 21, 17–27.
23.
RolleroCH.De PiccoliN. (2010a). Place attachment, identification and environment perception: an empirical study.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 198–205.
24.
RolleroC.De PiccoliN. (2010b). Does place attachement affect social well-being?Revue européenne de psychologie appliqué, 60, 233–238.
25.
SirgyM. J.CornwellT. (2002). How Neighborhood Features Affect Quality of Life.Social Indicators Research, 59, 79–114.
26.
SmithJ. S.CartlidgeM. R. (2011). Place attachment among retirees in Greensburg, Kansas.The Geographical Review, 101, 536–555.
27.
SpencerC. (2005). Place Attachment, Place Identity and the Development of the Child's Self-identity: Searching the Literature to Develop an Hypothesis.International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 14, 305–309.
28.
StaatsH.GemerdenE. V.HartigT. (2010). Preference for Restorative Situations: Interactive Effects of Attentional State, Activity-in-Environment, and Social Context.Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32, 401–417.
29.
UlrichR. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes. Some psychological effects.Environment and Behavior, 13, 523–556.
30.
UlrichR. S.SimonsR. F.LositoB. D.FioritoE.MilesM.ZelsonM. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201–230.
31.
WoldoffR. A. (2002). The effects of local stressors on neighborhood attachment.Social Forces, 81, 87–116.
