Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

English

El propósito de este trabajo es analizar las propiedades psicométricas del TEOSQ, en una muestra española, aplicado al contexto de la educación física escolar. Con ello se pretende determinar si constituye un instrumento válido y fiable para utilizar en futuras investigaciones en la Educación Física. Se administró a 6170 estudiantes representativos de las provincias de Almería, Granada y Murcia de ESO y ESPO, de edades comprendidas entre 12 y 19 años. El análisis factorial confirmatorio apoyó el modelo teórico hipotetizado de dos factores (orientación a la tarea y orientación al ego) para el TEOSQ-12EF. La baja correlación entre los factores demostró la independencia de los mismos y los coeficientes alfa mostraron una consistencia interna aceptable de las dos subescalas. Las pruebas indican que existen diferencias significativas por sexo, los alumnos presentan una mayor orientación al ego que las alumnas.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Balagué

(1990). La motivación en la actividad física y el deporte. Papeles del psicólogo, 44 y 45- Recuperado el 11 de mayo de 2010, de http://www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/vernumero.asp?id=451

Balaguer

Castillo

Duda

García-merita

(2011). Asociaciones entre la percepción del clima creado por el entrenador, orientaciones disposicionales de meta, regulaciones motivacionales y vitalidad subjetiva en jóvenes jugadoras de tenis. Revista de Psicología del Deporte. 20, 133–148.

Balaguer

Castillo

Tomás

(1996). Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Orientación al Ego y a la Tarea en el Deporte (TEOSQ) en su traducción al castellano. Psicológica, 17, 71–81.

Bentler

P. M.

(1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.

Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(1994). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Browne

Cudeck

(1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. En Bollen

Long

(Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Calabuig

Crespo

(2009). Using Delphi method to develop a measure of perceived quality of sport event spectators. Retos, 15, 21–25.

Carr

Weigand

(2001). Parental, peer, teacher and sporting hero influence on the goal orientations of children in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 1, 305–328.

Dorobantu

Biddle

(1997). The influence of the situational and individuals goals on the intrinsic motivation of Romanian adolescents towards physical education. European Year of Sport Psychology, 1, 148–165.

10.

Duda

J. L.

(1989). Relationship between task and ego orientation and the perceived purpose of sport among high school athletes. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 318–335.

11.

Duda

J. L.

Nicholls

J. G.

(1992). Dimensions of achievement-motivation in schoolwork and sport. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 290–299.

12.

Dweck

C. S.

(1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.

13.

Flores

Salguero

Márquez

(2008). Goal orientations and perceptions of the motivational climate in physical education classes among Colombian students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1441–1449.

14.

Goudas

Biddle

(1994). Perceived motivational climate and intrinsic motivation in school physical education classes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 9, 241–250.

15.

Hermoso

García

Chinchilla

J. J.

(2010). Estudio de la ocupación del tiempo libre de los escolares. Retos, 18, 913.

16.

Hoyle

R. H.

(1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

17.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

18.

Jackson

D. N.

(1970). A sequential system for personality scale development. En Spielberger

C. D.

(Ed.), Current topics in clinical and community psychology (pp. 61–96). Nueva York: Academic Press.

19.

Jöreskog

K. G.

Sörbom

(1993). Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

20.

Kline

R. B.

(1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Nueva York: Guilford.

21.

Ledent

Telama

Cloes

Carvalho

Piéron

(1996). Orientation des objectifs et participation à des activités sportives. Sport, 159/160, 82–89.

22.

Harmer

Chi

Vongjaturapat

(1996). Cross-cultural validation of the Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 18, 392–407.

23.

Maher

M. L.

Braskamp

L. A.

(1986). The motivation factor. A theory of personal investiment. Lexinton: Lexinton Books.

24.

Martín-albo

Núñez

J. L.

Navarro

J. G.

González

V. M.

(2006). Validación de la versión española de la escala multidimensional de orientaciones a la deportividad. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 15, 9–22.

25.

Nicholls

J. G.

(1992). The general and the specific in the development and expression of achievement motivation. En Roberts

(Ed.), Motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 31–56). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

26.

Nunnally

J. C.

Bernstein

I. J.

(1995). Teoría psicométrica. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.

27.

Nuviala

Tamayo

J. A

Nuviala

González

J. A.

Fernández

(2010). Psychometric properties of the rating scale sports organizations EPOD. Retos, 18, 82–87.

28.

Osterlind

S. J.

(1989). Constructing Test Items. Londres: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

29.

Papaioannou

Kouli

(1999). The Effect of Task Structure, Perceived Motivational Climate and Goal Orientations on Students' Task Involvement and Anxiety. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11, 51–71.

30.

Papaioannou

Mcdonald

A. I.

(1993). Goal perspectives and purposes of physical education as perceived by Greek adolescents. Physical Education Review, 16, 41–48.

31.

Peiró

Sanchís

J. R.

(2004). Las propiedades psicométricas de la versión inicial del cuestionario de orientación a la tarea y al ego (TEOSQ) adaptado a la educación física en su traducción al castellano. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 13, 25–39.

32.

Piéron

Ruiz

(2010). Actividad físico-deportiva y salud. Análisis de los determinantes de la practica en alumnos de Enseñanza Secundaria. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Deportes.

33.

Ryan

Deci

(2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 68–78.

34.

Sánchez

P. M.

Leo

F. M.

Gómez

F. R.

Sánchez

Cruz

García

(2009). Orientations and motivational climates of the other significatives in young handball players from Extremadura. Retos, 16, 22–27.

35.

Schumacker

R. E.

Lomax

R. G.

(1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

36.

Spaan

(2006). Test and item specifications development. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3, 71–79.

37.

Theodosiou

Papaioannou

(2006). Motivational climate, achievement goals and metacognitive activity in physical education and exercise involvement in out-of-school settings. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 361–379.

38.

Van

DER

Horst

Paw

Twisk

Van Mechelen

(2007). A Brief Review on Correlates of Physical Activity and Sedentariness in Youth. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 39, 1241–1250.

39.

Walling

M. D.

Duda

J. L.

(1995). Goals and their association with beliefs about success in and perceptions of the purpose of physical education. Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 14, 140–156.

40.

White

Duda

(1994). The relationship of gender, level of sport involvement, and participation motivation to task and ego orientation. Internationaljournal of Sport Psychology, 25, 4–18.

Versión española del “Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire (TEOSQ)” adaptado a Educación Física

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References