There is nothing so practical as a good…history: Kurt Lewin's place in the historical chapters of French language Social Psychology Textbooks

Abstract

Spanish

This article examines the paradoxical place occupied by Kurt Lewin in the history of social psychology. By analysing an exhaustive corpus of all French-language social psychology textbooks published between 1946 and 2000, we attempt to bring to light both the frequency of references to the author and the rhetoric employed to present his scientific contribution. Our results reveal a paradox underlying the way in which this eminent social psychologist is referred to. While the importance of his role in the formation of this discipline is emphatically reinforced, the full extent of his relevance is not accounted for. This paradox thus takes the form of a marginalisation, which is manifested in a tendency to concentrate on only a portion of his publications, in the stereotyped presentation of his experiments, and in the insufficient context provided for his studies.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BULLETIN OF THE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (1943). The problem of changing food habits. Report of the Committee on Food Habits (1941–1943), 108, 3–176.

Cooke

(2007). The Kurt Lewin-Goodwin Watson FBI/CIA Files: A 60th Anniversary there-and-then of the here-and- now. Human Relations, 60 (3), 435–462.

Faucheux

(1959). Introduction et morceaux choisis et présentés. In Lewin

(Ed.), Psychologie dynamique. Les relations humaines (pp. 1–20). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

Good

J. M.

(2000). Disciplining social psychology: A case study of boundary relations in the history of human sciences. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 36 (4), 383–403.

Haggbloom

S. J.

Warnick

J. E.

Jones

V. K

Yarbrough

G. L.

Russell

T. M.

Borecky

C. M.

Mcgahhey

Powell

J. L.

Beavers

Monte

(2002). The 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th Century. Review of General Psychology, 6 (2), 139–152.

Kalampalikis

Delouvee

Petard

J.-P.

(2006). Historical spaces of social psychology. History of the Human Sciences, 19 (2), 23–43.

Kaufmann

(1968). Kurt Lewin. Une théorie du champ dans les sciences de l'Homme. Paris: Vrin.

Latour

(1987). Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Marion

(2002). A tri-citation analysis exploring the citation image of Kurt Lewin. In Toms

E. G.

(Ed.), Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science, 65th Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, November 18–21, 2002 (pp. 3–13). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.

10.

Marion

(2004). Of tribes and totems: Author cocitation context analysis of Kurt Lewin's influence in social journals. PhD dissertation, Drexel University.

11.

Markova

(2008). The Epistemological Significance of the Theory of Social Representations. Journal for the Theory oof Social Behaviour, 38 (4), 461–487.

12.

Maslow

A. H.

(1969). The Psychology of Science. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.

13.

Merton

(1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159 (3818), 56–63.

14.

Merton

(1993). On the shoulders of giants. The post-italianate edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago press.

15.

Moscovici

(2000). Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

16.

Moscovici

Hewstone

(1984). De la science au sens commun. In Moscovici

(Ed.), Psychologie Social (pp. 539566). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

17.

Moscovici

Markova

(2006). The making of modern social psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

18.

Perlman

(1984). Recent developments in personality and social psychology: A citation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 493–501.

19.

Petard

J.-P.

Kalampalikis

Delouvee

(2001). Les histoires de la psychologie sociale dans ses manuels. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 52, 59–80.

20.

Rogers

E. M.

(1994). A history of communication study: a biographical approach. New York: The Free Press.

21.

Rouquette

M.-L.

(2005). La «communication sociale»: entre pléonasme et subversion. Hermès, 41, 33–38.