En el análisis de los malos tratos, desde la perspectiva de las relaciones interpersonales, tiene una considerable importancia el uso de tácticas para la resolución de conflictos entre la pareja y la existencia de celos románticos. Este trabajo surge ante la necesidad de traducir y adaptar escalas que miden estas variables. En concreto, validamos la escala de tácticas para resolución de conflictos (CTS2) (Straus, Hamby, Boney-McCoy y Sugarman, 1996) y la escala de celos románticos (White, 1976), prestando especial atención a sus propiedades psicométricas. Finalmente, describiremos las correlaciones entre ambas variables, centrándonos en la relación existente entre la escala de celos románticos y uno de los factores que encontramos en la CTS2 (acciones psicológicas), e indicando el significado de esta correlación en el marco de los malos tratos.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BilskyW.BorgI.WetzelsP. (1999). La exploración de tácticas para la resolución de conflictos en relaciones íntimas: reanálisis de un instrumento de investigación.Revista de Psicología Social, 4 (2–3), 225–234.
2.
ChristensenA.SullawayM. (1984). Communication Patterns Questionnaire. Manuscrito no publicado. Universidad de California: Los Ángeles.
3.
CunnighamA.JaffeP. G.BakerL.DickT.MallaS.MazaheriN.PoissonS. (1998). Theory-driven explanations of male violence against female partners: Literature update and related implications for treatment and evaluation.Londres: ON.
4.
CurrieD. H. (1998). Violent men or violent women. Whose definition counts? EnBergenR. K. (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence, (pp. 97–110). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
5.
DobashR. P.DobashR. E.WilsonM.DalyM. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence.Social Problems, 39, 71–91.
6.
DuttonD. G.SaundersK.StarzomskiA.BartholomewK. (1994). Intimacy-anger and insecure attachment as precursors of abuse in intimate relationships.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24 (15), 1367–1386.
7.
EdlesonJ. L. (1997). Polémica y cambio en los programas para hombres agresores. EnEdlesonJ. L.EisikovitsZ. C. (Eds.), Violencia doméstica: La mujer golpeada y la familia (pp. 221–244). Barcelona: Granica.
8.
FerreiraG. B. (1995). Hombres violentos, mujeres maltratadas.Buenos Aires: Ed. Sudamericana.
9.
FerrerV. A.BoschE. (2005). Introduciendo la perspectiva de género en la investigación psicológica sobre violencia de género.Anales de Psicología, 21 (1), 1–10.
10.
GielenA. C.McdonnellK. A.O'campoP. J. (2002). Intimate partner violence, HIV status, and sexual risk reduction.AIDS and Behavior, 6 (2), 107–116.
11.
GoodJ. A. (1999). Shame, images of God and the cycle of violence in adults who experienced childhood corporal punishment.Dissertation Abstracts International Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 59 (11-A), 4292.
12.
HalpernC. T.MartinS. L.OslakS. L.YoungM. L.KupperL. L. (2001). Partner violence among adolescents in opposite-sex romantic relationships: Findings from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health.American Journal of Public Health, 91 (10), 1679–1685.
13.
HambyS. L. (1996). The dominance scale: Preliminary Psychometric Properties.Violence and Victims, 11 (3), 199–212.
JohnsonM.FerraroK. (2000). Research on Domestic Violence in the 1980's: Making Distinctions.Journal of Marriage and Family, 62 (4), 948–63.
16.
JonesE. E.NisbettR. E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. EnJonesE. E. (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79–94). Nueva York: General Learning Press.
17.
JukesA. E. (1999). The problem outilned. EnJukesA. E. (Ed.), Men who batter women, (pp. 17–27). Londres: Routledge.
18.
KwongM. J.BartholomewK.DuttonD. G. (1999). Gender differences in patterns of relationship violence in Alberta.Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 31 (3), 150–160.
19.
MargolinG. (1988). Interpersonal and intrapersonal factors associated with marital violence. EnHotalingG. T.FinkelhorD. (Eds.). Family abuse and its consequences: New directions in research (pp. 203–217). Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc.
20.
Montes-BergesB.Rodríguez-garcíaC. (2006). La dominancia en el continuo personal-grupal: dominancia personal, interpersonal y SDO.Revista Electrónica de Iniciación a la Investigación, 2, 1–18.
21.
Montes-BergesB.Silván-ferreroM. P. (2004). Dominancia social y neosexismo: relación con las actitudes hacia programas de acción afirmativa.Revista de Psicología Social, 19 (3), 275–285.
22.
PaulL.BaenningerM. (1991). Aggression by women: Mores, myths and methods. EnBaenningerR. (Ed.), Targets of violence and aggression (pp. 401–441). North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.
23.
PennC. E. (2002). An exploratory study of female partner aggression: The role of relationship dynamics. Master of Science in Human Development. Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute.
24.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (4), 741–763.
25.
SagrestanoL. M.HeaveyC. L.ChristensonA. (1999). Perceived power and physical violence in marital conflict.Journal of Social Issues, 55 (1), 65–79.
26.
ShelbyK. A.CraigA. M. (2004). Dissatisfaction with relationship power and dating violence perpetration by men and women.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19 (5), 576–588.
27.
SilvermanJ. G.RajA.MucciL.A.HathawayJ. E. (2001). Dating violence against adolescent girls and associated substance use, unhealthy weight control, sexual risk behaviour, pregnancy, and suicidality.Journal of the American Medical Association, 286 (5), 572–579.
28.
StrausM. A. (1974). Levelling, civility, and violence in the family.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36, 13–29.
29.
StrausM. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflicts and violence: the Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88.
30.
StrausM. A. (1990). The Conflict Tactics Scale and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. EnStrausM. A.GellesR. J. (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8145 families (pp. 49–73). New Brunswick: Transaction Publications.
31.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-MccoyS.SugarmanD. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scale (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data.Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.
32.
WalkerL. E. A. (1989). Psychology and violence against women.American Psychologist, 44 (4), 695–702.
33.
WeiszA. N.TolmanR. M.SaundersD. G. (2000). Assessing the risk of severe domestic violence: The importance of survivors' predictions.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15 (1), 75–90.
34.
WhiteG. L. (1976). The social psychology of romantic jealousy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Universidad de California, Los Ángeles.
