Ambivalence plays an important role in human psychological functioning, yet few theories incorporate ambivalence as a focal topic. In this light, Else Frenkel-Brunswik was pioneer, for in her short lifetime she inspired the world of personality psychology by centring her study on ambivalence. The fruits of understanding surface level thought and behaviour through a place deeper inside are clear in her work; Frenkel-Brunswik provides a window into the presence of opposites within the self as well as the corresponding potential individuals have to avoid them. Broadly speaking, bringing ambivalence back as core topic for psychology allows models from a diverse array of perspectives to more fully account for the complexity of human life.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbeyE.ValsinerJ. (2005). Poetiken des Selbst: Zwischen Ambivalenz, Bedeutung, Formlosigkeit und Wandel.Psychologie & Gesellschaftskritik, 29 (115/116), 133–149.
2.
AdornoT. W.Frenkel-BrunswikE.LevinsonD. J.SanfordR. N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality.New York: Harper.
3.
BaldwinJ. M. (1915). Genetic theory of reality.New York: G.P. Putnam's sons.
4.
BenetkaG. (1995). Psychologie in Wien.Wien: WUV-Universitätsverlag.
5.
BrowerD. (1949). The problem of quantification in psychological science.Psychological Review, 56, 325–333.
6.
BühlerC. (1933). Der menschliche Lebenslauf als psychologisches Problem.Leipzig: S. Hirzel.
7.
BulloghE. (1912). “Psychical distance” as a factor in art and an aesthetic principle.Journal of Psychology, 5 (2), 87–118.
8.
CairnsR. B.ElderG.CostelloE. J. (1996). Developmental science.New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CupchikG. C.WinstonA. S. (1996). Confluence and divergence in empirical aesthetics, philosophy, and mainstream psychology. InFriedmanM. P.CarteretteE. C. (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Cognitive ecology (pp. 61–85) (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10.
DonnellyM. (1998). From political arithmetic to social statistics: how some nineteenth-century roots of the social sciences were implanted. InHeilbronJ.MagnussonL.WittrockB. (Eds), The rise of the social sciences and the formation of modernity (pp. 225–239). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
11.
FerreiraT.SalgadoJ.CunhaC. (2006). Ambiguity and the dialogical self: In search for a dialogical psychology.Estudios de Psicología, 27 (1), 19–32.
12.
FischerK.BidellT. (2006). Dynamic development of psychological structures in action and thought. InLernerR. (Ed), Handbook of Child Psychology. Vol. 1. 6th ed.New York: Wiley.
13.
FrenkelE. (1931). Atomismus und Mechanismus in der Assoziationspsychologie.Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 123, 193–258.
14.
FrenkelE. (1932). Lebenslauf, Leistung und Erfolg. InKafkaG. (Ed.), Bericht über den XII Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Hamburg vom 12.-16. April 1931 (pp. 331–335). Jena: Gustav Fischer.
15.
Frenkel-BrunswikE. (1939). Mechanisms of self deception.Journal of Social psychology, 10, 409–420
16.
Frenkel-BrunswikE. (1940). Psychoanalysis and personality research.Journal of abnormal and Social Psychology, 35, 176–197.
17.
Frenkel-BrunswikE. (1948). A study of prejudice in children.Human Relations, 1, 3, 295–306.
18.
Frenkel-BrunswikE. (1949). Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable.Journal of Personality, 18, 108–143.
19.
Frenkel-BrunswikE. (1954). Environmental controls and the impoverishment of thought. InFriedrichsC. J. (Ed), Totalitarianism (pp. 171–202). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
HermansH. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural Positioning.Culture and Psychology, 7, 3, 243–281
21.
HermansH. J. M. (1995). The limitations of logic in defining the self.Theory & Psychology, 5, 3, 375–382.
22.
HermansH. J. M.KempenH. (1993). The dialogical self: meaning as movement.San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23.
KreppnerK. (1992). William L. Stern, 1871–1938: a neglected founder of developmental psychology.Developmental Psychology, 28, 4, 539–547.
24.
KuschM. (1999). Psychological knowledge: A social history and philosophy.London: Routledge.
25.
MagnussonD. (1988). Individual development from an interactional perspective.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
PetitotJ.VarelaF.PachoudB.RoyJ.-M. (Eds.) (1999). Naturalizing phenomenology.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
27.
SchnallS. (1999). Life as the problem: Karl Duncker's context.From Past to Future: Clark Papers on the History of Psychology, 1, 2, 13–28.
28.
SmithM. B. (1990). Else Frenkel-Brunswik. InO'ConnellA. N.RussoN. F. (Eds.), Women in Psychology: A Bio-Bibliographic Sourcebook (pp. 88–95). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
29.
ValsinerJ. (1996). Social utopias and knowledge construction in psychology. InKoltsovaV. A.OleinikY. N.GilgenA. R.GilgenC. K. (Eds.), Post-Soviet perspectives on Russian psychology (pp. 70–84). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
30.
ValsinerJ. (1997). Culture and the development of children's action. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
31.
ValsinerJ. (1998). The pleasure of thinking: A glimpse into Karl Bühler's life.From Past to Future: Clark Papers on the History of Psychology, 1, 1, 15–35.
32.
ValsinerJ. (Ed) (2005a). Heinz Werner and developmental science.New York: Plenum.
33.
ValsinerJ. (2005b). Affektive Entwicklung im kulturellen Kontext. InAsendorpfJ. B. (Ed.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Vol. 3. Soziale, emotionale und Persönlichkeitsentwicklung (pp. 677–728). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
34.
VarelaF.ShearJ. (Eds.) (1999). The view from within: First-person approaches to the study of consciousness.Bowling Green, OH: Imprint Academic.
35.
VygotskyL. S. (1925/1971). Psychology of art.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
WagonerB.ValsinerJ. (2005). Rating tasks in psychology: from static ontology to dialogical synthesis of meaning. InGülerceA.HofmeisterA.StaeubleI.SaundersG.KayeJ. (Eds.), Contemporary theorizing in psychology: Global perspectives (pp. 197–213). Toronto: Captus Press.
