Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1997-01
Instrucción en estrategias y entrenamiento atribucional: efectos sobre la resolución de problemas y el autoconcepto de los estudiantes con dificultades en el aprendizaje
Este estudio investigó la eficacia del entrenamiento atribucional asociado a un programa dirigido a enseñar estrategias de resolución de problemas a estudiantes con dificultades en el aprendizaje (DA). El programa de instrucción de estrategias tuvo dos modalidades: (a) instrucción en estrategias mediante autoinstrucciones, y (b) instrucción en estrategias mediante autoinstrucciones más reentrenamiento atribucional explícito. Cuarenta y un niños de 5° de Primaria con DA se distribuyeron aleatoriamente en cuatro grupos: dos grupos de tratamiento, un grupo control placebo y un grupo control sin tratamiento. Los efectos se evaluaron en tres momentos (pretest, posttratamiento y seguimiento) a través de cuestionarios cumplimentados para padres y profesores, pruebas de resolución de problemas de matemáticas y autoinformes de atribuciones y autoconcepto. Los resultados indicaron que los estudiantes que siguieron un programa de instrucción en estrategias mejoraron en todas las medidas utilizadas, pero las ganancias, especialmente en la fase de seguimiento, fueron superiores en el grupo que además recibió reentrenamiento atribucional.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchenbachT. M. (1966). The Classification of Children's Psychiatric Symptoms: A Factor Analytic Study.Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–37.
2.
AchenbachT. M. (1978). The Child Behavior Profile: I. Boys aged 6–11.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 478–488.
3.
AchenbachT. M.EdelbrockC. S. (1979). The Child Behavior Profile: II. Boys aged 12–16 and girls aged 6–11 and 12–16.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 223–233.
4.
AndrewsG. R.DebusR. L. (1978). Persistence and the Causal Perception of Failure: Modifying Cognitive Attributions.Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 154–166.
5.
BorkowskiJ.WeyhingR. S.CarrL. A. (1988). Effects of Attributional Retraining on Strategy-Based Reading Comprehension in Learning Disabled Students.Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 46–53.
6.
CaseL. P.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (1992). Improving the Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills of Students with Learning Disabilities: Self-Regulated Strategy Development.The Journal of Special Education, 26, 1, 1–19.
7.
CooleyE. J.AyresR. R. (1988). Self-Concept and Success-Failure Atributions of Nonhandicapped students and students with Learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 174–178.
8.
CrandallV. C.KatkowskyW. Y.CrandallV. J. (1965). Children Beliefs in their own Control of Reinforcement in Intellectual Achievement Situations.Child Development, 36, 91–109.
9.
DouglasV. I. (1982). Higher mental processess in hyperactive children. Implications for training. En KnightsR. M.BakkerD. J. (Eds.), Treatment of Hyperactive and Learning Disordered Children (pp. 65–91). Baltimore: University Park Press.
10.
DweckC. S. (1986). Motivational Processes Affecting Learning.American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.
11.
GoldmanS. R (1989). Strategy instruction in mathematics.Learning Disabilities Quaterly, 12, 43–55.
12.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (1989). Components analysis of cognitive strategy instruction: Effects on learning disabled students' compositions and self-eficacy.Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 353–361.
13.
HarterS. (1982). The Perceived Competence Scale for Children.Child Development, 53, 87–97.
14.
HavertapeJ.KassC. (1978). Examination of Problem Solving in Learning Disabled Adolescents through Verbalized Self-Instruction.Learning Disability Quaterly, 1, 94–100.
15.
JacobsonG.LoveryB.DucetteY. (1986). Attributions of Learning Disabled Children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 59–64.
16.
KeoghD.WittmanT.MaxwellS. (1988). Self-instruction versus external instruction: Individual differences and training effectiveness.Cognitive Therapy & Therapy, 12 (6), 591–610.
17.
KistnerJ. A.OsborneM.LeverrierP. (1988). Causal Attributions of Learning Disabled Children. Developmental Patterns and Relation to Academic Progress.Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 46–53.
18.
LichtB. G.KitsnerJ. A. (1986). Motivational Problems of Learning Disabled Children: Individual Differences and Their Implication for Treatment. En TorgesenJ. K.WongB. Y. (Eds.), Psychological and Educational Perspectives on Learning Disabilities (pp. 225–255). New York: Academic Press.
19.
MeichembaumD. H.GoodmanJ. (1971). Training Impulsive Children to Talk to Themselves.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 115–126.
20.
MirandaC. A.LlácerM. D.PeiróR.SilvaF. (1993). Inventario de Problemas Escolares. En SilvaF.MartorellC. (Eds.), Evaluación de la personalidad infantil y juvenil (pp. 59–78). Madrid: MEPSA.
21.
MirandaA.FortesM. C. (1989). Aplicación de las Técnicas Cognitivo-Comportamentales en la Resolución de Problemas de Matemáticas.Revista de Psicología d la Educación, 1 (2), 57–72.
22.
MontagueM. (1992). The Effects of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategy Instruction on the Mathematical Problem Solving of Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25 (4), 230–248.
23.
MontagueM.BosC.DoucetteM. (1991). Affective, Cognitive, and Metacognitive attributes of eighth-grade Mathematical Problem Solvers.Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice, 6, 145–151.
24.
MontagueM.ApplegateB. (1993). Mathematical Problem-Solving Characterics of Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities.The Journal of Special Education, 27 (2), 175–201.
25.
MontagueM.BosC. (1986). The effect of Cognitive Strategy Training on Verbal Math Problem Solving Performance of Learned Disabled Adolescents.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 26–33.
26.
MontagueM.BosC. (1990). Cognitive and Metacognitive characteriscs of eighth-grade Students' Matehmatical Problem-Solving.Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 109–127.
27.
PalincsarA. S.BrownA. (1984). Reciprocal Teaching Comprehension-fostering and Comprehension-monitoring activities.Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
28.
PearlR.BryanT.DonahueM. (1980). Learning Disabled Students Attributions for Success and Failure.Learning Disability Quaterly,3, 3–9.
29.
PintrichP. R.AndermanE. M.KlobucarC. (1994). Intraindividual Differences in Motivation and Cognition in Students With and Without Learning Disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27 (6), 360–370.
30.
PressleyM. (1986). The relevance of the good strategy user model to the teaching of mathematics.Educational Psychologist, 21, 139–161.
31.
PressleyM.BorkouskiJ. G.SchneiderW. (1987). Cognitive strategies. Good Strategy users coordinate metacognition and Knowledge. En VastaR.WhiterhustG. (Eds.), Annals of Child Development, Vol 5 (pp. 89–129). New York: JAI Press.
32.
SawyerR. J.GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (1992). Direct Teaching, Strategy instruction and Strategy Instruction with Explicit Self-Regulation: Effects on the Composition skills and Self-Efficacy of Students with Learning Disabilities.Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 340–352.
33.
SchunckD. H. (1985). Self-Efficacy and Classroom Learning.Psychology in the Schools, 22, 208–223.
34.
SchunkD. H.CoxP. D. (1986). Strategy Training and Atributional Feedback with Learning Disabled Students.Journal of Educational Psychology, 78 (3), 201–209.
35.
SheltonT. L.AnastopoulosA. D.LindenJ. D. (1985). An Attribution Training Program with Learning Disabled Children.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 261–265.
36.
ToroJ.CerveraM. (1984). TALE:Test de Análisis de la lectoescritura.Madrid: Visor.
37.
Van DijkT. A.KintschW. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension.New York: Academic Press.
38.
WillisG. B.FusonK. C. (1988).Teaching Children to use Schematic Drawings to solve Addition and Subtration word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (2),192–201.
39.
WoodD. A.RosembergM. S.CarranD. T. (1993). The Effects of Tape-Recorded Self-Instruction Cues on The Mathematics Performance of Students with Learning Disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26 (4), 250–258.
40.
YusteC. (1985). BADIG-E:Batería de Aptitud Diferernial y General.Madrid: CEPE.
