Acquisition theory should be able to provide an explanation for the complexity of adult grammar, and the stages children go through in their path to attain the abstractness of the adult system. Current debate obscures the problem by failing to explicitly address the complexity of early representations. It is fundamental to offer concrete proposals that can fully characterise the early stages of development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BorerH.WexlerK. (1987). The maturation of syntax. In RoeperT.WilliamsE. (Eds.), Parameter Setting (pp.123–172). Dordrecht: Reidel.
2.
ChomskyN. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax.Cambridge: MIT Press.
3.
ClahsenH.EisenbeissS.PenkeM. (1996). Lexical learning in early syntactic development. In ClahsenH. (Ed.), Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition (pp. 129–159). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
4.
FujimuriC. (2010). Acquisition of recursive possessives in Japanese. Unpublished Manuscript. University of Massachusetts/Amherst.
5.
NaiglesL.HoffE. (2006). Verbs at the very beginning: Parallels between comprehension and input. In Hirsh-PasekK.GolinkoffR. (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs (pp. 336–363). New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
RoeperT. (1992). From the Initial State to V-2: Acquisition Principles in Action. In MeiselJ. (Ed.), The Acquisition of Verb Placement (pp. 333–371). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
7.
RoeperT. (in press). Interfaces, frequency and the primary linguistics data problem. Lingua.
