This paper describes three studies on verb production and argument structure in children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI) using different methodologies. The first is an observational study which uses a spontaneous-talk longitudinal sample. The second uses an experimental sentence naming task as a result of event video observation. The third comprises an experimental sentence naming task with static images that differ in verb argument complexity. Although the specific data vary according to the methodology used, there is clear evidence that Catalan and Spanish speaking children with SLI have special difficulties in producing verbs with a highly complex argument structure and make errors in the specification of obligatory arguments. It is concluded that both processing limitations and deficits in the semantic representation of verbs may play a role in these difficulties.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArapovicD.AndelM. (2003). Morfoloske pogreske u diskursu djece s PJT [Morphological errors in discourse of children with SLI].Hrvatska Revija za Rehabilitacijska Istrazivanja, 39, 11–16.
2.
BatesE.MacwhinneyB. (1987). Competition, variation and language learning. In MacwhinneyB. (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
ClahsenH. (1989). Grammatical characterization of developmental dysphasia.Linguistics, 27, 897–920.
5.
ClahsenH. (1991). Child language and developmental dysphasia.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6.
Conti-RamsdenG.JonesM. (1997). Verb use in specific language impairmentJournal of Speech and Hearing Research, 40, 1298–1313.
7.
De JongJ. (1999). Specific Language impairment in Dutch: Inflectional Morphology and argument structure.Enxchede, NL: Print Partners Ipskamp.
8.
DunnLL.DunnL. M.ArribasD. (2006). PPVT-III Peabody, Test de Vocabulario en Imágenes.Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
9.
Ellis WeismerS. (1994). Factors influencing novel word learning and linguistic processing in children with specific language impairment. Paper presented at the Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders, Madison, WI, June.
10.
Ellis WeismerS.EvansJ.HeskethL. (1999). An examination of verbal working memory capacity in children with specific language impairment.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 42, 1249–1260.
11.
Ellis WeismerS.HeskethL. (1996). Lexical learning by children with specific language impairment: Effects of linguistic input presented at varying speaking rates.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 177–190.
12.
EyerJ.LeonardL. (1995). Functional categories and specific language impairment: A case study.Language Acquisition, 4, 177–203.
13.
FletcherP.GarmanM. (1988). Normal language development and language impairment: syntax and beyong.Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 2, 97–113.
14.
FletcherP.PetersJ. (1984). Characterizing language impairment in children: An exploratory study.Language testing, 1, 33–49.
15.
GopnikM. (1990). Feature-Blind Grammar and Dysphasia.Nature, 344, 715.
16.
GopnikM.CragoM. B. (1991). Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder.Cognition, 39, 1–50.
17.
GrelaB. G. (2003). The omission of subject arguments in children with Specific Language Impairment.Clinical linguistic & phonetics, 17, 2, 153–169.
18.
GrelaB. G.LeonardL. B. (1997). The use of subject arguments by children with SLI.Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 11, 443–453.
19.
GrelaB.LeonardL. B. (2000). The influence of argument structure complexity on the use of auxiliary verbs by children with SLI.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1115–1125.
20.
GrimshawJ. (2005). Semantic structure and semantic content in lexical representation. In J. Grimshaw, Words and Structure (pp. 75–89). Standford: CSLI Publications.
21.
HadleyP.RiceM. (1996). Emergent uses of BE and DO: Evidence from children with specific language impairment.Language Acquisition, 5, 209–243.
22.
HanssonK. (1997). Patterns of verb usage in Swedish children with SLI: An application of recent theories.First Language, 17, 195–217.
23.
IngramD.CarrL. (1994). When morphology ability exceeds syntactic ability: A case study. Paper presented at the Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, New Orleans, November.
24.
JackendoffR. (2002). Foundations of language: brain, meaning, grammar, evolution.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
JohnstonJ. R. (1991). Questions about cognition in children with specific language impairment. In MillerJ. F. (Ed.), Research on child language disorders: A decade of progress (pp. 299–307). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
26.
KaufmanA. S.KaufmanN. L. (2004). KBIT: Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (KBIT, Spanish version).Madrid: TEA Editions.
27.
KellyD. (1997). Patterns in verb use by preschoolers with normal language and specific language impairment.Applied Psycholinguistics, 18 (2), 199–218.
28.
KellyD.RiceM. (1994). Preferences for verb interpretation in children with SLI.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 182–192.
29.
KerschensteinerM.HuberW. (1975). Grammatical impairment in developmental aphasia.Cortex, 11, 264–282.
30.
KingG.FletcherP. (1993). Grammatical problems in school-age children with specific language impairment.Clinical Linguistic and Phonetics, 7, 339–352.
31.
LeonardL. (1995). Functional categories in the grammars of children with specific language impairment.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1270–1283.
32.
LeonardL. (1998). Specific Language Impairment.London: The MIT Press.
33.
LeonardL. (2000). Specific language impairment across languages. In BishopD. V. M.LeonardL. B. (Eds.), Speech and Language Impairments in Children: Causes, Characteristics, Intervention and Outcome (pp. 115–130). Hove: Psychology Press.
34.
LeonardL.EyerJ.BedoreL.GrelaB. (1997). Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English-speaking children with specific language impairment.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 40, 741–753.
35.
LevinB.RappaportH. M. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
MacwhinneyB. (2000). CHILDES Project.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37.
MillerC.KailR.LeonardL.TomblinB. (2001). Speed of processing in children with specific language impairment.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 44 (2), 416–433.
38.
PinkerS. (1989). Language Acquisition. In OshersonD. N.LasnikH. (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science; Volume 1. Language (pp. 199–241). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
RiceM. L.BodeJ. (1993). GAPS in the verb lexicons of children with SLI.First Language, 13, 113–131.
40.
RiceM. L.WexlerK. (1996). Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1239–1257.
41.
RiceM.WexlerK. (1997). Highly specified and long-term grammatical deficits appear in children with language impairments.Cambridge, MA: Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT.
42.
RiceM.WexlerK.CleaveP. (1995). Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitives.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 850–863.
43.
SaboritC.JuliánJ. P. (2005). ELI—L'Avaluació del Llenguatge Infantil.Castelló de la Plana: Universitat Jaume I.
44.
Sanz-TorrentM.AguilarE.SerratE.SerraM. (2001). Verb Type Production in Catalan and Spanish Children with SLI. In AlmgremmM.BarreñaA.EzeizabarrenaM. J.IdiazabalI.MacwhinneyB. (Eds.), Research on Child Language Acquisition (pp. 909–922). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
45.
Sanz-TorrentM.BadiaI.SerraM. (2008). Contributions from the bilingual Specific Language Impairment in Catalan and Spanish to the understanding of the normal and pathological language acquisition. In Pérez-vidalC.Juan-GarauM.BelA. (Eds.), A portrait of the young in the new multilingual spain (pp. 135–158). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
46.
Sanz-TorrentM.SerratE.AndreuLL.SerraM. (2008). Verb morphology in Catalan and Spanish in children with SLI: a developmental study.Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 22 (6), 459–474.
47.
SchelletterC.SinkaI.FletcherP.InghamR. (1999). English speaking SLI children's use of locative/contact and causative alternations. In GarmanM.LettsC.RichardsB.SchelletterC.EdwardsS. (Eds.), Issues in normal and disordered child language: from phonology to narrative (pp. 106–117). Special Issue of The New Bulmershe Papers. Reading: University of Reading.
48.
TalmyL. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems.Cambridge: MIT Press.
49.
ThordardottirWeismerS. E. (2002). Verb argument structure weakness in specific language impairment in relation to age and utterance length.Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 16 (4), 233–250.
50.
VanDERLelyH. (1994). Cannonical linking rules: forward versus reverse linking in normally developing and specifically language-impairment children.Cognition, 51, 29–72.
51.
WatkinsR.RiceM.MoltzC. (1993). Verb use by language-impaired and normally developing children.First Language, 13, 133–143.
52.
WechslerD.CorderoA.DeLACruzM. V. (1993). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Revised (WISC-R, Spanish version).Madrid: TEA Editions.
