Fostering higher-order thinking skills of students is important aim for 21st century education. Teachers, as important elements in a positive learning environment, are the key to high quality education. As for the importance of teacher professional collaboration in teacher development, Hargreaves and Fullan (2012) pointed out that teachers’ professional collaboration will benefit not only students but also the whole school community, and even society at large. In Chinese context, the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (2010) issued a policy in 2010 promoting teacher professional collaboration and development as a background of this study, implying that teachers must be collaborating actively with colleagues in daily professional life to achieve collective growth for the purpose of improving student learning.
Based on the policy reality, this study explored teacher professional collaboration in the Chinese education context. It looked in particular at practices and issues in teacher professional collaboration. This article begins with the definitions of teacher professional collaboration, followed by a detailed exploration of this type of collaboration in Chinese education and issues related to its implementation. This study will provide holistic picture of teacher collaboration in China for contributing to theoretical development and educational practice.
BoyerE.L. (1995) The basic school: A community for learning.Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie.
2.
BoyleB., WhileD., & T. Boyle. (2004) LongitudinalA. Study of Teacher Change: What Makes Professional Development Effective? The Curriculum Journal 15 (1), 45-68. 10.1080/1026716032000189471.
3.
CaoQ. (2017) The landscape of “Leading”. Junior High School Students World, (44), 10–12.
4.
ChenF. (2016). International Experience and Enlightenments on “S-U” Cooperation of Teacher Education: From the Perspective of Teacher Professional Development. Primary & Secondary Schooling Abroad (2), 37-42. (in Chinese).
5.
ChenY. (2012). Based on the practical survey of cooperation of teachers’ professional development. Chinese Journal of Education (5), 84-87. (in Chinese).
6.
CohenS.G., & BaileyD.E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239–290.
7.
CorcoranT.B. (1995). Helping Teachers Teach Well: Transforming Professional Development. Brunswick, NJ: Policy Briefs, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
8.
DatnowA. (2011). Collaboration and contrived collegiality: Revisiting Hargreaves in the age of accountability. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 147–158.
9.
De LimaJ.Á. (2001). Forgetting about friendship: Using conflict in teacher communities as a catalyst for school change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(2), 97–122.
10.
DengT. (2007). A review on the research of teachers professional collaboration in western countries. Studies in Foreign Education, 34(7), 14-18. (in Chinese).
11.
DengT. (2008). An Exploration on Influential Factors of Teacher Professional Collaboration. Studies in Foreign Education, 35(12), 7-12. (in Chinese).
12.
DesimoneL.M. (2011). PrimerA. on Effective Professional Development. Kappan 92 (6), 68-71. 10.1177/003172171109200616.
13.
DongY., LiuY., & HangG. (2012). U-G-S:Design and Implementation of Innovative Teacher Education Model. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) (6), 170-175. (in Chinese).
14.
DufourR. (2004). What is a professional learning community. Educational Leadership, (8), 6–11.
15.
DuFourR., & EakerR. (2010). On common ground: The power of professional learning communities. Solution Tree Press.
16.
EschlerB.H. (2016). Finnish Teacher Collaboration: The Behaviors, Learning, and Formality of Teacher Collaboration. (Doctoral dissertation.). Brigham Young University, Provo, usa.
17.
GaretM.S., PorterA.C., DesimoneL., BirmanB.F., & S.Y. Kwang. (2001). What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results from a National Sample of Teacher. American Educational Research Journal 38 (4): 915-945. 10.3102/00028312038004915. GrossmanP., WineburgS., & WoolworthS. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher comunity. The Teachers College Record, 103, 942–1012.
18.
GuoD. (2007). Mutual help and cooperation: Effective Strategy for the teacher professionalization development. Theory and Practice of Education, 27(11), 28-32. (in Chinese).
19.
HaironS., & C. Dimmock. (2012). Singapore Schools and Professional Learning Communities: Teacher Professional Development and School Leadership in an Asian Hierarchical System. Educational Review64 (4): 405-424. 10.1080/00131911.2011.625111.
20.
HargreavesA., & FullanM. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York: Teachers College Press.
21.
HeC. (2013). The teacher collaboration in teacher studio. Shanghai Education Study (12), 57-58. (in Chinese).
22.
HordS.M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, Texas: sedl, 27.
23.
HuY. (2012). Empirical study on the nature of teaching and research group in secondary schools in china: A case study of secondary schools in the urban area of Beijing. Journal of Education Studies, 8(6), 78-88. (in Chinese).
24.
JamesC., DunningG., ConnollyM., & ElliottT. (2007). Collaborative practice: a model of successful working in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(5), 541–555.
25.
KelchtermansG. (2006). Teacher collaboration and collegiality as workplace conditions. A review. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52(2), 220–237.
26.
LeeP.M., & A.A. Sharicz. (2014). The Unfolding of a Professional Learning Community. Pedagogy and the Human Sciences 1 (4), 39–50.
27.
LiD.W., & LiH.Y. (2014). The organization form and perfect strategy of teacher collaboration. Journal of Educational Institute of Jilin Province, 7(30), 355. (in Chinese).
28.
LiH.X. (2011a). The case study of partenership beteen university and kindergarten to promote the teacher professional development. (Masteral Dissertation). Northwest Normal University, LanZhou, China. (in Chinese) Retrived from cnki database.
29.
LiJ. (2011b). Study on the university teacher professional development under professional learning community. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 9. (in Chinese).
30.
LiM. (2008). Research on construction and operating model of excellent teaching team in university. (Masteral Dissertation). Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nan Jing, China. (in Chinese) Retrieved from cnki database.
31.
LiY. (2016). The analysis of the model of teacher professional collabration in universities and local school research section. The Inservice Education And Training of School Teachers (2), 10-14. (in Chinese).
32.
LinX. (2013). Collaboration of mathematics teachers in primary and secondary school under the new curriculum. Journal of Teaching and Management, 55-57. (in Chinese).
33.
LinY. (2007). The pathological phenomenon dialysis of teacher culture. Educational development research, 12. (in Chinese).
34.
LittleJ.W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536.
35.
LittlerD., LeverickF. & BruceM. (1995). Factors Affecting the Process of Collaborative Product Development:Study A. of UK Manufactures of Information and Communication Technology Products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12, 16–32.
36.
LiuL. (2011). Based on the development of teaching in English teachers’ cooperative team. Journal of Teach, 41-42. (in Chinese).
37.
LiuL.M., & YangN. (2017). The construction of college teachers’ professional learning community based on cooperative culture. Teacher Educational Forum, 30(07), 5–9.
38.
LuY. (2007). A study of teachers’ professional co-operation practice. (Masteral Dissertation). East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. (in Chinese) Retrieved from cnki database.
39.
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2010). On deepening the basic education curriculum reform to further improve the quality of education (in Chinese). Retrieved from http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2010-06/02/content_1619006.htm.
40.
Ministry of Education of The People's Republic of China. (2012). Professional standards for kindergarten teacher, primary teacher, secondary teacher (Trial). Retrieved from http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2012-09/14/content_2224534.htm.
41.
NiuL.H. (2014). The threshold and breakthrough of recognition Some misunderstanding of teacher professional collaboration and its subsequent efforts. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), (1), 175-178. Retrieved from ProQuestD issertations & Theses A&I database.
42.
SargentT.C., & E. Hannum. (2009). Doing More with Less: Teacher Professional Learning Communities in Resource-Constrained Primary Schools in Rural China. Journal of Teacher Education 60 (3), 258-276. doi: 10.1177/0022487109337279.
43.
ShenJ. (2015). Key elements and situation analysis of teacher community. Curriculum, Teaching material and Method, 35(4), 105-109. (in Chinese).
44.
TanC.2013. Learning from Shanghai: Lessons on Achieving Educational Success. Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-4021-87-6.
45.
ThomasG., & WineburgS., & GrossmanP. (1998). In the company of colleagues: An interim report of the development of a community teacher learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, (1), 21–32.
46.
Van MaanenJ., & BarleyS.R. (1984). Occupational communities: culture and control in organizations. La Revue Du Praticien, 15(29), 38–53.
47.
VangriekenK., DochyF., RaesE., & KyndtE. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17–40.
48.
Villegas-ReimersE. (2003). Teacher Professional Development: An International Review of the Literature. Paris: unesco.
49.
WallerW. (1932). The sociology of teaching.UK: Books on Demand.
50.
WangB.Y. (2013). The problem analysis and countermeasure suggestion of university teacher collaboration. Journal of Linyi University, (2), 13–16.
51.
WangH. (2016). The analysis of operating elements based on regional collaboration in teacher education community: A case study of “Outstanding teacher study project” in primay and middle school teachers from Beijing, Suzhou, Guangdong, Zhejinag. The Inservice Education and Training of School Teachers, 363, 6-10. (in Chinese).
52.
WangT. (2014). “Contrived Collegiality versus Genuine Collegiality: Demystifying Professional Learning Communities in Chinese Schools.” Compare, 45 (6), 908-930. doi: 10.1080/03057925.2014.952953.
53.
WeiL.R. (2014). Expert teacher workshop led me to grow. Henan Education (Basic Edition), (12), 27.
54.
WenQ.F. & RenQ.M. (2010). The characteristics, trends, problems and countermeasures of professional development research - Analysis of related literatures from 1999 to 2009 in China. The Journal of Foreign Languages in China, (4), 77–83.
55.
WestheimerG. (2008). Illusions in the spatial sense of the eye: Geometrical-optical illusions and the neural representation of space. Vision Research, 48, 2128-2142. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.05.016.
56.
WuJ. (2009). Based on the cooperation of classroom observation: The perspective of the educational research group. Modern Science of Education (2), 23-27. (in Chinese).
57.
WuW. (2012). An epistemology analysis based on the cooperation between a young professional and fresh teachers. Studies in Preschool Education (2), 44-48. (in Chinese).
58.
XiaB. (2015). The construction of teachers’ professional development community in Chinese-foreign collabration in running schools. Higher Education Exploration (5), 113-116. (in Chinese).
59.
XinX., & WangD. (2011). University-kindergarten partnership: An effective approach to raising preschool education quality in western areas: Refer experiences of school improvement project for early childhood education of the Chinese University of Hong Kong. Early Childhood Education (Educational Sciences) (11), 17-21. (in Chinese).
60.
YangW.M. (2013). Professional learning community: origin, connotation and operation strategy. Higher Education Exploration, (4), 17–21.
61.
YeL., & SiH. (2017). Based on “pet” collabration mode of primary and secondary school teachers’ professional development research and practice. The Inservice Education and Training of School Teachers (2), 09–12.
62.
YuC. (2007). A study of the working style difficult position and relevant strategies for the teacher's cooperation team. (Masteral Dissertation). East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. (in Chinese) Retrieved from cnki database.
63.
ZhangH., & ZhangJ. (2011). On the primary and high school teacher cooperation over the past thirty years. Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science Edition), 13(4), 22-26. (in Chinese).
64.
ZhangZ. (2014). Development and features of teachers’ collaboration in teaching and research abroad. Primary & Secondary Schooling Abroad (8), 48-52. (in Chinese).
65.
ZhangZ., & PengS. (2012). The three implications for teacher education community. Educational Research (11), 93-97. (in Chinese).
66.
ZhangZ., & ZhaoQ. (2012). Teacher education community: Content, meaning and strategy. Journal of Capital Normal University (Social Sciences Edition) (6), 132-135. (in Chinese).
67.
ZhouF., LiangA., & WangL. (2016). The current situation, problems and promotion mechanism for teachers team of primary and secondary school. Theory and Practice of Education, 36(10), 44-47. (in Chinese).
68.
ZhuY. (2014). A research on co-teaching partnership between Chinese and foreign teachers overseas. Language Education and Research (36-44). (in Chinese).
