In the current study, we analyzed 400 essays from 4th and 8th grade students in a city in the northeastern region of the United States on the topic of whether iPads should be used in the classroom setting, especially when students abuse the privilege. Using thematic analyses to code the essays, we found that students from both grades were sophisticated and discerning in their attitudes and views about the potential benefits and limitations of using iPads in schools. We also found that although a majority of 4th and 8th grade students (87.5% 4th grade; 68% 8th grade) generally supported the use of iPads in their classrooms, a larger percentage of 8th grade students (30%) were opposed to the decision. Students from both grades spontaneously justified their attitudes by explaining how iPad might affect individual and collaborative learning.
ApplebeeA. N., LangerJ. A., NystrandM., & GamoranA. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685–730.
2.
AroninS., & FloydK. K. (2013). Using an iPad in inclusive preschool classrooms to introduce stem concepts. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(4), 34–39.
3.
Cardoso LeiteP., GreenC. S., & BavelierD. (2015). On the impact of new technologies on multitasking. Developmental Review, 35, 98–112.
4.
CummingT. M., & RodriguezC. D. (2013). Integrating the iPad into language arts instruction for students with disabilities: Engagement and perspectives. Journal of Special Education Technology, 28(4), 43–52.
5.
DeWittP. (2013). Are schools prepared to let students byod?Education Week.
6.
Duhaysolongsod SnowL., C., SelmanR. L., & DonovanS. (2016) Toward disciplinary literacy: Dilemmas and challenges in designing history curriculum to support middle school students. Harvard Education Review, 12/2015; 85(4): 587–608.
7.
DündarH., & AkçayırM. (2014). Implementing tablet PCs in schools: Students’ attitudes and opinions. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 40–46.
8.
EisenS., & LillardA. S. (2016). Just Google it: Young children's preferences for touch-screens versus books in hypothetical learning tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 7.
9.
FalloonG. (2015). What's the difference? Learning collaboratively using iPads in conventional classrooms. Computers & Education, 84, 62–77.
10.
FalloonG., & KhooE. (2014). Exploring young students’ talk in iPad-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 77, 13–28.
HaßlerB., MajorL., & HennessyS. (2016). Tablet use in schools: a critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(2), 139–156.
13.
HutchisonA., BeschornerB., & Schmidt-CrawfordD. (2012). Exploring the use of the iPad for literacy learning. The Reading Teacher, 66(1), 15–23.
14.
JowettE. L., MooreD. W., & AndersonA. (2012). Using an iPad-based video modelling package to teach numeracy skills to a child with an autism spectrum disorder. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 15(4), 304–312.
15.
KucirkovaN., MesserD., SheehyK., & PanaderoC. F. (2014). Children's engagement with educational iPad apps: Insights from a Spanish classroom. Computers & Education, 71, 175–184.
16.
LorahE. R., TincaniM., DodgeJ., GilroyS., HickeyA., & HantulaD. (2013). Evaluating picture exchange and the iPad™ as a speech generating device to teach communication to young children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 25(6), 637–649.
17.
MangenA., & KuikenD. (2014). Lost in an iPad: Narrative engagement on paper and tablet. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(2), 150–177.
NguyenL., BartonS. M., & NguyenL. T. (2015). iPads in higher educationmdash;Hype and hope. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 190–203.
20.
VibergO., & Grönlund, Å. (2013). Cross-cultural analysis of users’ attitudes toward the use of mobile devices in second and foreign language learning in higher education: A case from Sweden and China. Computers & Education, 69, 169–180.
