While scientific interest in the relationship between psychotherapeutic praxis and spirituality is growing, there is still little knowledge on this topic, especially in an East Central European context. To explore how psychotherapists understand spiritual issues and experiences they encounter in their work and to learn what happens to these issues in the course of psychotherapy, this study analyses semi-structured interviews with 30 Hungarian psychotherapists. Applying a grounded theory analytical strategy, three main topics were identified: the therapist's attitude towards spirituality leaves a discernible trace in the psychoterapeutic treatment; the therapist influences the way spiritual issues are treated; and the therapist may have a shared spiritual experience with the client. We present individual variations of these experiences as they appear in the code tree. Results are interpreted with reference to a systemic view of the psychotherapeutic process, the intersubjective space of patient and therapist, and the notion of the therapists’ mentalizational capacity.
BarnettJ. E. (2016). Are religion and spirituality of relevance in psychotherapy?Spirituality in Clinical Practice, 3(1), 5–9. doi: 10.1037/scp0000093
3.
BatemanA. W., & FonagyP. (2006). Mentalization-based treatment for borderline personality disorder: A practical guide.New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
BenkőA. (2006). Hit, vallás, spiritualitás [Faith, religion, spirituality]. In TőzsérE. (Ed.), Istenhit mint erőforrás [Theism as a resource] (pp. 9–40). Budapest: Új Ember.
5.
BergerP. L., & LuckmannT. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge.Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
6.
BlairL. J. (2015). The influence of therapists’ spirituality on their practice: A grounded theory exploration. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 15(3), 161–170. doi: 10.1002/capr.12015
7.
BögreZs. (2005). Vallásosság és identitás. Élettörténetek a diktatúrában (1948-1964) [Religiosity and identity: Life stories in a dictatorship (1948-1964)]. Budapest, Pécs: Dialóg Campus Kiadó.
8.
BrownO.ElkoninD., & NaickerS. (2013). The use of religion and spirituality in psychotherapy: Enablers and barriers. Journal of Religion and Health, 52(4), 1131–1146. doi: 10.1007/s10943-011-9551-z
9.
BucherA. (2007). Psychologie der Spiritualität. Handbuch [The Psychology of Spirituality: A Handbook]. Weinheim: Beltz.
10.
BucherA. A. (2014). Auf dem Weg zu einer spirituellen Psychologie? [Towards a Spiritual Psychology?]. Zeitschrift für Psychodrama und Soziometrie, 13(1), 125–136. doi: 10.1007/s11620-014-0213-5
11.
BudaB.TomcsányiT.HarmattaJ.Csáky-PallaviciniR., & PanethG. (2009). The psychotherapy in hungary during the Socialist era and the Socialist dictatorship. European Journal of Mental Health, 4(1), 67–99. doi: 10.1556/EJMH.4.2009.1.5
12.
CharmazK. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis.London: Sage.
14.
CharmazK. (2008). Grounded theory. In SmithJ. A. (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 81–110). London: Sage.
15.
CloningerC. R.SvrakicD. M., & PrzybeckT. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50(12), 975–990. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240059008
16.
CorveleynJ.LuytenP., & DezutterJ. (2013). Psychodynamic psychology and religion. In PaloutzianR. F., & ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 94–117). New York, London: The Guilford Press.
17.
CrossleyJ. P., & SalterD. P. (2005). A question of finding harmony: A grounded theory study of clinical psychologists’ experience of addressing spiritual beliefs in therapy. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 78(3), 295–313. doi: 10.1348/147608305X26783
18.
Csáky-PallaviciniR.AsztalosB.FöldváriM.Csáky-PallaviciniZs.IttzésA., & TomcsányiT. (2005). Die gesellschaftliche und religiöse Entwicklung in Ungarn seit 1945 im Spiegel der seelischen Gesundheit der Bevölkerung [Social and Religious Development in Hungary since 1945 in Light of the Population's Mental Health]. International Journal of Practical Theology, 9(2), 217–235. doi: 10.1515/ijpt.2005.9.2.21
19.
CummingsJ. P.IvanM. C.CarsonC. S.StanleyM. A., & PargamentK. I. (2014). A systematic review of relations between psychotherapist religiousness/spirituality and therapy-related variables. Spirituality in Clinical Practice, 1(2), 116–132. doi: 10.1037/scp0000014
20.
DelaneyH. D.MillerW. R., & BisonoA. M. (2007). Religiosity and spirituality among psychologists: A survey of clinician members of the American Psychological Association. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 38(5), 538–546. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.38.5.538
21.
DemlingJ. H.WörthmüllerM., & O'ConnollyT. A. (2001). Psychotherapie und Religion [Psychotherapy and Religion]. PPmP-Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 51(2), 76–82. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-10756
22.
EmmonsR. A. (2003). The psychology of ultimate concern.New York: Guilford.
23.
FonagyP., & TargetM. (2003). Pszichoanalitikus elméletek a fejlődés-pszichopatológia tükrében [Psychoanalytic theories in the light of developmental psychopathology]. Budapest: Gondolat Kiadó.
HampG. (2006). Kölcsönös tudás—kommunikáció és megismerés [Mutual knowledge—communication and cognition]. Budapest: Typotex.
26.
HarmattaJ., & Csáky-PallaviciniR. (2008). Unravelled chapters of our common past. European Journal of Mental Health, 3(1), 63–65. doi: 10.1556/EJMH.3.2008.1.4
27.
HenwoodK., & PidgeonN. (2003). Grounded theory in psychological research. In CamicP. M.RhodesJ. E., & YardleyL. (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 131–156). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28.
HofmannL., & WalachH. (2011). Spirituality and religiosity in psychotherapy: A representative survey among German psychotherapists. Psychotherapy Research, 21(2), 179–192. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2010.536595
29.
HoodR. W.Jr., & BelzenJ. A. (2013). Research methods in the psychology of religion and spirituality. In PaloutzianR. F., & ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 75–93). New York, London: The Guilford Press.
30.
Horváth-SzabóK.HarmattaJ., & TomcsányiT. (2009). Teisztikus és humanisztikus spiritualitás [Theistic and humanistic spirituality]. Pszichoterápia, 18(3), 173–179.
31.
HundtU. (2003). Psychotherapie und Spiritualität [Psychotherapy and Spirituality]. Journal für Psychologie, 11(4), 368–386.
32.
HundtU. (2007). Spirituelle Wirkprinzipien in der Psychotherapie [Working Principles in Spirituality in Psychotherapy]. Berlin: LIT Verlag.
33.
JákiZs.TomcsányiT., & IttzésA. (2016). Spiritualitás, vallás és pszichoterapeutaképzés: Mit, miért, hogyan? [Spirituality, religion, and the training of psychotherapists: What, why, how?]Pszichoterápia, 25(4), 291–300.
34.
JordahlD. (1990). Psychotherapeuten denken religiös: Eine überraschende bilanz [Psychotherapists think religiously: A surprising finding]. Olten: Walter.
MacDonaldD. A., & HollandD. (2002). Examination of the psychometric properties of the temperament and character inventory self-transcendence dimension. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(6), 1013–1027.
37.
Magaldi-DopmanD.Park-TaylorJ., & PonterottoJ. G. (2011). Psychotherapists’ spiritual, religious, atheist or agnostic identity and their practice of psychotherapy: A grounded theory study. Psychotherapy Research, 21(3), 286–303. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2011.565488
38.
Marks-TarlowT. (2011). Merging and emerging: A nonlinear portrait of intersubjectivity during psychotherapy. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 21(1), 110–127. doi: 10.1080/10481885.2011.545333
39.
MotlJ.VaněčkováA.MüllerM., & StudenovskýD. (2015). History of psychotherapy in the Czech lands. European Journal of Mental Health, 10(1), 79–93. doi: 10.5708/EJMH.10.2015.1.5
40.
MuellerD. C. (2009). Reason, religion and democracy.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
PaloutzianR. F., & ParkC. L. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality.New York, London: Guilford Press.
42.
PargamentK. I. (1999). The psychology of religion and spirituality? Yes and no. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 9(1), 3–16. doi: 10.1207/s15327582ijpr0901_2
43.
PargamentK. I.ExlineJ.JonesJ.MahoneyA., & ShafranskeE. (Eds.). (2013). APA handbooks in psychology: APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol. 1). Context, theory, and research.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
44.
PiedmontR. L. (1999). Does spirituality represent the sixth factor of personality? Transcendence and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 67(6), 987–1013. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00080
45.
PonterottoJ. G. (2005). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 126–136. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.126
46.
PonterottoJ. G. (2010). Qualitative research in multicultural psychology: Philosophical underpinnings, popular approaches, and ethical considerations. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16(4), 581–589. doi: 10.1037/a0012051
47.
ŘíčanP. (2003). Spirituality in psychology. The concept and its context. Studia Psychologica, 45, 249–257.
48.
ShafranskeE. P., & CummingsJ. P. (2013). Religious and spiritual beliefs, affiliations, and practices of psychologists. In PargamentK. I.MahoneyA., & ShafranskeE. (Eds.), Handbooks in psychology: APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol. 2). An applied psychology of religion and spirituality (23–42). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
49.
SternD. N. (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life.New York: Norton.
50.
StolorowR. D., & AtwoodG. E. (1996). The intersubjective perspective. Psychoanalytic Review, 83, 181–194.
51.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
SzőnyiG. (2015). A pszichoterápia tankönyve [Psychotherapy: A textbook]. Budapest: Medicina.
53.
TomkaM. (2010). Vallási helyzetkép—2009 [Religious situation—2009]. In RostaG., & TomkaM. (Eds.), Mit értékelnek a magyarok [What do Hungarians value]? (pp. 401–425). Budapest: Ocipe Magyarország—JTMR Faludi Ferenc Akadémia.
54.
TomkaM., & ZulehnerP. (1999). Religion in den Reformländern Ost(Mittel) Europas. [Religion in the East (Central) European Reform Countries]. Ostfildern: Schwabenverlag.
55.
TörökP. (2003). Hungarian church-state relationships: A socio-historical analysis.Budapest: Hungarian Institute for Sociology of Religion.
56.
TudoseC., & TudoseF. (2012). History of psychotherapy in Rumania during the socialist dictatorship of Nicolae Ceauşescu. European Journal of Mental Health, 7(2), 221–235. doi: 10.5708/EJMH.7.2012.2.4
57.
VargaI. (1995). Modernity or pseudo-modernity? Secularization or pseudo-secularization? In RobertsR. H. (Ed.), Religion and the transformations of capitalism (pp. 231–247). London, New York: Routledge.
58.
VergoteA. (1993). What the psychology of religion is and what it is not. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 3(2), 73–86.
59.
WadeN. G.PostB. C.CornishM. A.VogelD. L., & Runyon-WeaverD. (2014). Religion and spirituality in group psychotherapy: Clinical application and case example. Spirituality in Clinical Practice, 1(2), 133–144. doi: 10.1037/scp0000013
60.
ZinnbauerB. J.PargamentK.ColeB.RyeM. S.ButterE. M.BelavichT. G., … KadarJ. L. (1997). Religion and spirituality: Unfuzzying the fuzzy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36(4), 549–564.
