Religious Reflection Scales yield cross-cultural data suggesting that religious traditions have potentials to integrate intellect with faith. This investigation extended analysis of that possibility to Sunni Muslim university students in Malaysia (N = 211) and also examined the hypothesis that Islamic commitments to knowledge (Ilm) promote religious openness. Faith and Intellect Oriented Religious Reflection correlated positively and predicted openness. The Truth of Texts and Teachings factor from the Religious Schema Scales essentially assesses a form of fundamentalism and displayed direct linkages with religious openness as well. Ilm factors from the Ummatic Personality Inventory correlated positively with religious openness and mediated associations of Islamic Religious Reflection with other constructs. Quest as a presumed index of religious openness proved to be incompatible with sincere Muslim commitments. These findings supplemented previous Muslim, Christian, and Hindu data in confirming the potential openness of religious traditions.
Abu-RaiyaH., & HillP. C. (2014). Appraising the state of measurement of Islamic religiousness. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 6, 22–32.
2.
AikenL. S., & WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
3.
AllportG. W., & RossM. J.Jr. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443.
4.
AltemeyerB., & HunsbergerB. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133.
BaronR. M., & KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
7.
BatsonC. D., & SchoenradeP. (1991). Measuring religion as quest: 2) Reliability concerns. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 430–447.
8.
BatsonC. D.SchoenradeP., & VentisW. L. (1993). Religion and the individual.New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
DonahueM. J. (1985). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 400–419.
10.
DoverH.MinerM., & DowsonM. (2007). The nature and structure of Muslim religious reflection. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 2, 189–210.
11.
FrancisL. J.SahinA., & Al-FailakawiF. (2008). Psychometric properties of two Islamic measures among young adults in Kuwait: The Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude toward Islam and the Sahin Index of Islamic Moral Values. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 3, 9–24.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP. J.ChenZ., & DoverH. (2013). Varieties of openness in Tehran and Qom: Psychological and religious parallels of faith and intellect oriented Islamic religious reflection. Mental Health, Religion, & Culture, 16, 123–137.
14.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP. J.GhramalekiA. F.MorrisR. J., & HoodR. W.Jr. (2002). Muslim-Christian religious orientation scales: Distinctions, correlations, and cross-cultural analysis in Iran and the United States. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 12, 69–91.
15.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP. J., & HargisM. B. (2008). Integrative Self-Knowledge Scale: Correlations and incremental validity of a cross-cultural measure developed in Iran and the United States. Journal of Psychology, 142, 395–412.
16.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP. J., & KhanZ. (2007). Theoretical, empirical, and potential ideological dimensions of using Western conceptualizations to measure Muslim religious commitments. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 2, 113–131.
17.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP. J.RezazadehZ., & CunninghamC. J. L. (2011). Dialogical validity of religious measures in Iran: Relationships with integrative self-knowledge and self-control of the “Perfect Man” (Ensān-e Kāmel). Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 33, 93–113.
18.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP. J.SaeediZ.ChenZ., & SilverC. F. (2012). Religious problem-solving and the complexity of religious rationality within an Iranian Muslim ideological surround. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51, 656–675.
19.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP. J.ShamohammadiK., & CunninghamC. J. L. (2009). Post-critical beliefs in Iran: Predicting religious and psychological functioning. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 20, 217–237.
20.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP. J.TavakoliF., & ChenZ. J. (2015). Self-control within a Muslim ideological surround: Empirical translation schemes and the adjustment of Muslim seminarians in Iran. Manuscript submitted for publication.
21.
GoldbergL. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In MervieldeI.DearyI.De FruytF., & OstendorfF. (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
22.
GorsuchR. L., & McPhersonS. E. (1989). Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E revised and single-item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 348–354.
23.
HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
24.
HoodR. W.Jr., & MorrisR. J. (1985). Conceptualization of quest: A critical rejoinder to Batson. Review of Religious Research, 26, 391–397.
25.
KambleS. V.WatsonP. J.MarigoudarS., & ChenZ. (2014a). Varieties of openness and religious commitment in India: Relationships of attitudes toward Hinduism, Hindu religious reflection, and religious schema. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 36, 172–198.
26.
KambleS. V.WatsonP. J.MarigoudarS., & ChenZ. (2014b). Attitude toward Hinduism, religious orientations, and psychological adjustment in India. Mental Health, Religion, and Culture, 17, 161–172.
27.
MacIntyreA. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality?Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
28.
OthmanN. (2011). Exploring the ummatic personality dimensions from the psychospiritual paradigm. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 3(2), 37–47.
29.
RahmanF. (1988). Islamization of knowledge: A response. The American Journal of Islamic Social Science, 5, 3–11.
30.
SahinA., & FrancisL. J. (2002). Assessing attitude toward Islam among Muslim adolescents: The psychometric properties of the Sahin-Francis scale. Muslim Educational Quarterly, 19, 35–47.
31.
SpiegelJ. S. (2014). Open-mindedness and Christian flourishing. Christian Psychology, 8(1), 38–48.
32.
StreibH.HoodR. W.Jr., & KleinC. (2010). The Religious Schema Scale: Construction and initial validation of a quantitative measure for religious styles. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 20(3), 151–172.
33.
TaylorC. (2003). Modern social imaginaries.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
34.
TaylorC. (2007). A secular age.Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
35.
WaniH.AbdullahR., & ChangL. W. (2015). An Islamic perspective on managing religious diversity. Religions, 6.642–656.
36.
WatsonP. J. (1993). Apologetics and ethnocentrism: Psychology and religion within an ideological surround. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 3, 1–20.
37.
WatsonP. J. (2006). Friends of the truth, violence, and the ideological surround: Social science as meetings for clearness. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 28, 123–132.
38.
WatsonP. J. (2011). Whose psychology? Which rationality? Christian psychology within an ideological surround after postmodernism. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 30, 307–316.
39.
WatsonP. J.ChenZ., & GhorbaniN. (2014). Extrinsic cultural religious orientation: Analysis of an Iranian measure in university students in the United States. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 35, 61–78.
40.
WatsonP. J.ChenZ., & HoodR. W.Jr. (2011). Biblical foundationalism and religious reflection: Polarization of faith and intellect oriented epistemologies within a Christian ideological surround. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 39, 111–121.
41.
WatsonP. J.ChenZ.GhorbaniN., & VartanianM. (2015). Religious openness hypothesis: I. Religious reflection, schemas, and orientations within religious fundamentalist and biblical foundationalist ideological surrounds. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 34, 99–113.
42.
WatsonP. J.ChenZ., & MorrisR. J. (2014). Varieties of quest and the religious openness hypothesis within religious fundamentalist and biblical foundationalist ideological surrounds. Religions, 5, 1–20.
43.
WatsonP. J.ChenZ.MorrisR. J., & StephensonE. (2015). Religious Openness Hypothesis: III. Defense against secularism within fundamentalist and biblical foundationalist ideological surrounds. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 34, 125–140.
44.
WatsonP. J.GhorbaniN.VartanianM., & ChenZ. (2015). Religious openness hypothesis: II. Religious reflection and orientations, mystical experience, and psychological openness of Christians in Iran. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 34, 114–124.
45.
WatsonP. J.SawyersP.MorrisR. J.CarpenterM.JimenezR. S.JonasK. A., & RobinsonD. L. (2003). Reanalysis within a Christian ideological surround: Relationships of intrinsic religious orientation with fundamentalism and right-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 31, 315–328.
