The Religious Openness Hypothesis argues that traditional religions have resources for integrating intellect with faith. In a test of this hypothesis, Hindu graduate students in India (N = 320) responded to Hindu religious reflection, attitudes toward Hinduism, religious schema, religious orientation, and psychological openness scales. Faith and intellect oriented religious reflection correlated positively with each other and with the all three religious schemas, which also correlated directly. Linkages with attitudes toward Hinduism and intrinsic and extrinsic personal religious orientations documented the compatibility of religious reflection and schema with Hindu commitments. Associations with greater openness to experience and need for cognition confirmed their psychological openness as well. Interactions between attitudes toward Hinduism and the intrinsic orientation suggested that Hinduism had more positive influences in those who were more sincerely religious. These data from India most importantly supported the Religious Openness Hypothesis.
AikenL. S., & WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
2.
AllportG. W., & RossM. J.Jr. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443.
3.
AltemeyerB., & HunsbergerB. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133.
4.
BaronR. M., & KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
5.
BatsonC. D., & SchoenradeP. (1991a). Measuring religion as quest: 1) Validity concerns. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 416–429.
6.
BatsonC. D., & SchoenradeP. (1991b). Measuring religion as quest: 2) Reliability concerns. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 430–447.
7.
BatsonC. D.SchoenradeP., & VentisW. L. (1993). Religion and the individual.New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.FeinsteinJ. A., & JarvisW. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253.
9.
DonahueM. J. (1985). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 400–419.
10.
DoverH.MinerM., & DowsonM. (2007). The nature and structure of Muslim religious reflection. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 2, 189–210.
11.
FrancisL. J.RobbinsM.SantoshR., & BhanotS. (2008). Religion and mental health among Hindu young people in England. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 11, 341–347.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP. J.ChenZ., & DoverH. (2013). Varieties of openness in Tehran and Qom: Psychological and religious parallels of faith and intellect oriented Islamic religious reflection. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 16, 123–137.
14.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP. J.GeranmayepourS., & ChenZ. (in press). Muslim experiential religiousness: Relationships with attitude toward Islam, religious reflection, and basic needs satisfaction in Iranians. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion.
15.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP. J., & HargisM. B. (2008). Integrative Self-Knowledge Scale: Correlations and incremental validity of a cross-cultural measure developed in Iran and the United States. Journal of Psychology, 142, 395–412.
16.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP. J., & KhanZ. (2007). Theoretical, empirical, and potential ideological dimensions of using Western conceptualizations to measure Muslim religious commitments. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 2, 113–131.
17.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP. J.RezazadehZ., & CunninghamC. J. L. (2011). Dialogical validity of religious measures in Iran: Relationships with integrative self-knowledge and self-control of the “Perfect Man” (Ensān-e Kāmel). Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 33, 93–113.
18.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP. J.ShamohammadiK., & CunninghamC. J. L. (2009). Post-critical beliefs in Iran: Predicting religious and psychological functioning. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 20, 217–237.
19.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP. J.ZarehiJ., & ShamohammadiK. (2010). Muslim extrinsic cultural religious orientation and identity: Relationships with social and personal adjustment in Iran. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 31, 15–28.
20.
GoldbergL. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In MervieldeI.DearyI.De FruytF., & OstendorfF. (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
21.
GorsuchR. L., & McPhersonS. E. (1989). Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E revised and single-item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 348–354.
22.
HoodR. W.Jr.HillP. C., & WilliamsonW. P. (2005). The psychology of religious fundamentalism.New York: Guilford Press.
23.
HoodR. W.Jr., & MorrisR. J. (1985). Conceptualization of quest: A critical rejoinder to Batson. Review of Religious Research, 26, 391–397.
24.
KambleS. V.WatsonP. J.MarigoudarS., & ChenZ. (in press). Attitude toward Hinduism, religious orientations, and psychological adjustment in India. Mental Health, Religion & Culture.
25.
KhanZ.WatsonP. J., & ChenZ. (2013). [Perceptions of parents and Islamic religious reflection in Pakistan.] Unpublished raw data.
26.
LesmanaC. B., & TiliopoulosN. N. (2009). Schizotypal personality traits and attitudes towards Hinduism among Balinese Hindus. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 12, 773–785.
27.
McCraeR. R., & CostaP. T. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(6), 882–888.
28.
SmartN. (1987). Religion and the Western mind.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
29.
StreibH.HoodR. W.Jr., & KleinC. (2010). The Religious Schema Scale: Construction and initial validation of a quantitative measure for religious styles. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 20(3), 151–172.
30.
TiliopoulosN.FrancisL. J., & SlatteryM. (2010). The internal consistency reliability of the Santosh-Francis Scale of Attitude toward Hinduism among Bunts in South India. North American Journal of Psychology, 12, 185–190.
31.
UzielL. (2010). Rethinking social desirability scales: From impression management to interpersonally oriented self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 243–262.
32.
WatsonP. J. (1993). Apologetics and ethnocentrism: Psychology and religion within an ideological surround. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 3, 1–20.
33.
WatsonP. J. (2011). Whose psychology? Which rationality? Christian psychology within an ideological surround after postmodernism. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 30, 307–316.
34.
WatsonP. J.ChenZ., & GhorbaniN.(in press). Extrinsic cultural religious orientation: Analysis of an Iranian measure in university students in the United States. Journal of Beliefs and Values.
35.
WatsonP. J.ChenZ.GhorbaniN., & VartanianM. (2013). Religious openness hypothesis: I. Religious reflection, schemas, and orientations within religious fundamentalist and biblical foundationalist ideological surrounds. Manuscript submitted for publication.
36.
WatsonP. J.ChenZ., & HoodR. W.Jr. (2011). Biblical foundationalism and religious reflection: Polarization of faith and intellect oriented epistemologies within a Christian ideological surround. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 39, 111–121.
37.
WatsonP. J.ChenZ., & MorrisR. J. (in press). Varieties of quest and the religious openness hypothesis within religious fundamentalist and biblical foundationalist ideological surrounds. Religions.
38.
WatsonP. J.GhorbaniN.VartanianM., & ChenZ. (2013). Religious openness hypothesis: II. Religious reflection, mystical experience, and religious orientations of Christians in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Manuscript submitted for publication.
39.
WatsonP. J.MillironJ. T., & MorrisR. J. (1995). Social desirability scales and theories of suicide: Correlations with alienation and self-consciousness. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 701–711.
40.
WatsonP. J., & MorrisR. M. (2008). Self-control within a Christian ideological surround. Edification: Journal of the Society for Christian Psychology, 2(2), 62–72.
41.
WatsonP. J.MorrisR. J.FosterJ. E., & HoodR. W.Jr. (1986). Religiosity and social desirability. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 25, 215–232.
42.
WatsonP. J.MorrisR. J., & HoodR. W.Jr. (1989). Interactional factor correlations with means and end religiousness. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 337–347.
43.
WatsonP. J.MorrisR. J.HoodR. W.Jr.MillironJ. T., & StutzN. L. (1998). Religious orientation, identity, and the quest for meaning in ethics within an ideological surround. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 8, 149–163.
44.
WatsonP. J.SawyersP.MorrisR. J.CarpenterM.JimenezR. S.JonasK. A., & RobinsonD. L. (2003). Reanalysis within a Christian ideological surround: Relationships of intrinsic religious orientation with fundamentalism and right-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 31, 315–328.
