Foundations and Mass Movements: The Case of the World Social Forum1

Abstract

Foundation funding flows to very diverse activities, including welfare programs, the arts, academia, and the media. It has been argued that all such funding, no matter how apparently non-political the activity, has political significance, strengthening the hegemony of the ruling classes. By their very nature, foundation interventions in social movements play a political role.

This includes their involvement with apparently “grassroots” protests such as the World Social Forum, where the individuals, organizations, and institutions assisted by foundations span a wide range, some even espousing radical views. This flexibility and range in fact increase the reach and influence of foundations, allowing them to intervene in rapidly changing social developments. Since foundations are largely created and sustained by the ruling classes and state powers of the imperialist countries, foundation intervention in social movements in the imperialist countries as well as in the third world should be seen as part of imperialism's efforts to prevent the emergence of systemic challenges to its rule at home and its sway abroad.

Keywords

World Social Forum India Ford Foundation Non-governmental organizations ATTAC

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Balakrishnan, S. 2004. “ Six-day WSF event will cost Rs 8.5 crore .” Times of India (January 15). Retrieved 15 January 2004 (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/423829.cms) .

Benjamin, Alan. 2003. “ How Not to Fight Globalization? ” The Organizer. Retrieved 6 November 2003 (http://www.theorganizer.org/to/tond-3.htm).

Cabrera, Luis. 2000. “ A Year Later, Seattle Still Feeling Effects from WTO Protests ” Trade Observatory (November 25). Retrieved 30 July 2003 (http://www.tradeobservatory.org/headlines.cfm?refID=16264)

Callinicos, Alex. 2002. “ Parliament of the People .” Socialist Review (February) Retrieved July 30 2003 (http://www.socialistreview.org.uk/article.php?articlenumber=7836) .

Economist. 2000. “Angry and effective.” (September 23): 85—87.

Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting [FAIR]. 2003. “Media Advisory: Media Missing New Evidence about Genoa Violence.” FAIR (January 10). Retrieved 23 June 2003 (http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1634) .

Ford Foundation. Grants Database. Retrieved 14 November 2004 (http://www.fordfound.org/grantsdb).

Funders Network on Trade and Globalization. 2003. Retrieved 11 August 2003. (http://www.fntg.org).

George, Susan. 1988. A Fate Worse Than Debt. London : Penguin .

10.

Grzybowski, Candido. 1997. “ IBASE and New Funding Arrangements .” ECDPM Anniversary Seminar, Maastricht, (12—13 May). Retrieved 1 August 2003. (http://www.oneworld.org/ecdpm/anniv/fingrz.html).

11.

Hivos. 2002. Annual Report 2002. Retrieved 14 November 2004 (http://www.hivos.nl/english/abouthivos/index.html).

12.

Hoge, Warren. 2001. “ G-8 too apologetic: Blair .” New York Times Service. In Asian Age (July 19). Retrieved 23 June 2003 (http://asianage.com ).

13.

Jordan, Lisa. 2004. “ The Ford Foundation and the World Social Forum .” Open Democracy (January 15). Retrieved 14 November 2004 (http://www.opendemocracy.net/debates/article-6-91-1678.jsp).

14.

Karat, Prakash. 1988. Foreign Funding and the Philosophy of Voluntary Organisations . New Delhi: National Book Centre

15.

Klein, Naomi. 2001. “ A Fete for the End of History .” The Nation (March 19): 19—23.

16.

Krishnakumar, R. 2003. “ Derailing decentralisation .” Frontline (August 11). Retrieved 20 March 2004 (http://india.eu.org/240.html).

17.

Maxwell, Kenneth. 2003. “ Lula's surprise .” New York Review of Books (July 3): 27—29 .

18.

Menon, Meena , 2004. “ Resisting when Bush comes to shove .” Humanscape (February). Retrieved 22 November 2004 (http://www.humanscape.org/Humanscape/new/feb04/resisting.htm ).

19.

Mumbai Resistance (MR). 2003. “ Introducing MR 2004.” Retrieved 30 December 2003 (http://www.mumbairesistance.org).

20.

Muralidharan, Sukumar. 2004. “ Globalised Struggle .” Frontline (February 13). Retrieved 20 March 2004 ( http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2103/stories/20040213007100400.htm ).

21.

Parker, Jim. 2000. “ World Economic Forum unrest showcases new divide .” Times of India Retrieved 23 June 2003 (September 14). (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com ).

22.

Novib. 2002. Annual Report 2002 . Retrieved: 14 November 2004 (http://www.novib.nl/media/download/jaarverslag/verkortjaarverslag2002_engels.pdf).

23.

Organizer, The. 2003. “ Report on World Social Forum 2 of Porto Alegre, Brazil.” Retrieved 11 June 2003. (http://www.theorganizer.org/ilc/wsf2-report.htm ).

24.

Oxfam UK. 2003. Annual Report 2002—03. Retrieved 14 November 2004 ( http://www.oxfam.org.uk).

25.

People against Imperialism. 2004. “ Smash Imperialism! Expose WSF! Alternative is Socialist World!” (January). Retrieved 2 March 2004 (http://india.indymedia.org/en/2004/01/208487.shtml).

26.

Petras, James. 2002. “Porto Alegre 2002: A tale of two forums .” Rebelión . Retrieved 17 June 2003. ( http://www.rebelion.org).

27.

Prashad, Vijay. 2003. “ Politics at the Venue: The WSF in Mumbai .” Znet Daily Commentaries (December 30). Retrieved 14 January 2004 (http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2003-12/30prashad.cfm ).

28.

———. 2004. “ The WSF Process and Its Understanding .” The People's Movement (January-February). Retrieved 6 October 2006 (http://www.demokratiafoorumi.fi/wsf-towards_mumbai_2.html).

29.

Research Unit for Political Economy (RUPE). 2003. “ The Economics and Politics of the World Social Forum: Lessons for the Struggle against `Globalization.'” Aspects of India's Economy 35 (September). Retrieved 6 October 2006 (http://www.rupe-india.org/35/howandwhy.html).

30.

Roelofs, Joan. 2003. Foundations and Public Policy: The Mask of Pluralism . Albany, NY: State University of New York Press .

31.

Rohter, Larry. 2005. “Success Brings Brazilian Workers' Party a Surprise: Disarray.” New York Times (reproduced in Asian Age, March 5). Retrieved: 6 October 2006 ( http://www.hinduonnet.com/2005/03/01/stories/2005030100961000.htm ).

32.

Roy, Arundhati. 2004. “ Do Turkeys Enjoy Thanksgiving? ” Speech at the opening plenary session of the World Social Forum (January 16). Retrieved: 2 February 2004 (http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=4873 ).

33.

Saunders, Frances Stonor. 1999. Who Paid the Piper? The CIA and the Cultural Cold War. London: Granta .

34.

“ Second World Social Forum in Porto Alegre: Is another world possible?” 2002. Retrieved: 2 February 2004 (http://www.marxist.com/Globalization/wsf2_porto_alegre.html ). Translated from the Austrian Marxist magazine Der Funke (February).

35.

Teivainen, Teivo. 2003. “World Social Forum: What should it be when it grows up?” Retrieved 1 September 2003 ( http://www.opendemocracy.net/debates/article-3-31-1342.jsp).

36.

La Verité, no. 32, Spring 2003, theoretical magazine of the Fourth International.

37.

Workers Power Global. 2002. “ European social forum: ATTAC pulls movement to the right.” (November 3) Retrieved August 3 2003 (http://www.fifthinternational.org ).

38.

World Social Forum. (WSF) 2003a. India Policy Guidelines. Retrieved 26 August 2003 (http://www.wsfindia.org/backend/doc_files/IndiaPolicyGuideline.doc ).

39.

———. 2003b. “World Social Forum Charter of Principles . Retrieved 14 August 2003 (http://www.wsfindia.org/charter.htm ).

40.

———. 2004. “Another World Is Possible: Schedule.” Retrieved 2 February 2004 (http://www.wsfindia.org ).

41.

World Social Forum Secretariat. 2003. “Project World Social Forum 2004.” “WSF 2004 in Mumbai, India” “WSF internationalization process.” Retrieved 14 August 2003 (http://www.wsfindia.org ).

42.

“WSF Demonstrates Its Potential.” 2004. “Editorial.” People's Democracy (January 25): 1.