A review of the funding strategies and priorities of the Carnegie, Rockefeller, and Ford Foundations over the past twenty-five years indicates that although these major philanthropies have adjusted to changing international and national contexts, they continued to engage in the same activities identified by Arnove (1980) in Philanthropy and Cultural Imperialism. These foundations claim to attack the roots causes of the ills of humanity; however they essentially engage in ameliorative practices to maintain social and economics systems that generate the very inequality and injustices they wish to correct.
Arnove, Robert F., ed. 1980. Philanthropy and Cultural Imperialism: The Foundations at Home and Abroad . Boston, MA: G.K. Hall.
2.
Becker, Elizabeth.2004. “Number of Hungry Rising, U.N. Says.” New York Times Dec. 8:A3.
3.
Bendaña, Alejandro.1998. “Which Way for NGOs?” Interhemispheric Resource CenterBulletin, October.
4.
Berman, Edward H.1983. The Influence of the Carnegie, Ford, and Rockefeller Foundations on American Foreign Policy: Ideology of Philanthropy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
5.
Berresford, Susan V.1997. “President's Message,” Ford Foundation 1997 Annual Report. New York: Ford Foundation.
6.
———. 1998. “President's Message,” Ford Foundation 1998 Annual Report. New York: Ford Foundation.
7.
———. (2004). Statement of Susan V. Berresford in response to the announcement by the American Civil Liberties Union ( http://www.fordfound.org).
8.
Carnegie Foundation.1998 . Annual Report. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
———. 2004. Statement by Gordon Conway Regarding the ACLU's Grant Decision, November 29 (http://www.rockfound.org ).
14.
Coon, Horace. [1938] 1990. Money to Burn. New Brunswick: Transaction.
15.
Council on Foundations.2003. “ Comments to the Internal Revenue Service on International Grantmaking,” August. (http://www.cof.org/Content/General/Display.cfm?contentID=791 ).
16.
Cullather, Nick.2004. “Miracles of Modernization: The Green Revolution and the Apotheosis of Technology.” Diplomatic History28(2):227—254.
17.
Despeignes, Peronet.2004. “Census: Poverty rose by million.” USA Today, August 27: A1.
18.
Fisher, Donald.1980. “American Philanthropy and the Social Sciences: Reproduction of a Conservative Ideology.” Pp. 233—268 in Philanthropy and Cultural Imperialism: The Foundations at Home and Abroad , edited Robert F. Arnove.Boston, MA: G.K. Hall.
19.
———. 1993. Development of the Social Sciences: Rockefeller Philanthropy and the United States Social Sciences Research Council. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press .
20.
Ford Foundation.1979. Annual Report. New York: Ford Foundation . Available: http://www.fordfound.org.
21.
———. 1985. Annual Report. New York: Ford Foundation. Available: http://www.fordfound.org .
22.
———. 1989. Annual Report. New York: Ford Foundation. Available: http://www.fordfound.org .
23.
———. 1991. Annual Report. New York: Ford Foundation. Available: http://www.fordfound.org .
24.
———. 1993. Annual Report. New York: Ford Foundation. Available: http://www.fordfound.org .
25.
———. 1996. Annual Report. New York: Ford Foundation. Available: http://www.fordfound.org .
26.
———. 1997. Annual Report. New York: Ford Foundation. Available: http://www.fordfound.org .
27.
Foundation Center.2004. International Grantmaking: An Update on US Foundation Trends. Prepared in cooperation with the Council on Foundations (http://www.fdncenter.org/research).
28.
Frank, Thomas.2004. “American Psyche.” New York Times (Sunday Book Review), November 28. Retrieved 1 December 2006 (http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/28/books/review/28FRANKL.html).
29.
Friedman, Lawrence J.2003. “Philanthropy in American: Historicism and its Discontents .” In Lawrence J. Friedman and Mark D. McGarvie, eds., Charity, Philanthropy, and Civility in American History. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press, 1—21.
———. 1998. “President's Letter.” 1997 Annual Report . New York: Rockefeller Foundation .
32.
Gregorian, Vartan.1998. “Libraries and Andrew Carnegie's Challenge .” In 1998 Annual Report. New York : Carnegie Corporation.
33.
———. “ New Directions for Carnegie Corporation of New York: A Report to the Board .” February 2, 1999 (http://www.carnegie.org/sub/programs/nedcontentss.html ).
34.
Hamburg, David.1997. Perspective on Carnegie Corporation's Program 1983—1997. 1996 Annual Report. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
35.
Hart, Jeffrey.1973. “Foundations and Social Activism: A Critical View .” In Fritz F. Heinmann, ed., The Future of Foundations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 53.
36.
Herbert, Bob.2004a. “Working For A Pittance.” New York Times, October 8: A27.
37.
———. 2004b. “Shhh, Don't Say Poverty.” New York Times, November 22: A31.
38.
Howe, Barbara.1980. “The Emergence of Scientific Philanthropy .” In Robert F. Arnove, ed., Philanthropy and Cultural Imperialism: The Foundations at Home and Abroad . Boston, MA: G.K. Hall, 25—54.
39.
Hudson Institute Bradley Center for Philanthropy and Civic Renewal.2004. “What Is Philanthropy's Responsibility to the American Regime?” Invitation to attend November 30, 12:00—2:00 p.m. talk by senior fellow John Fonte.
40.
Laski, Harold.1930. “Foundations, Universities, and Research” In Harold Laski, Dangers of Obedience and Other Essays . New York: Harper & Brothers .
41.
Lenkowsky, Leslie.1999. “Reinventing Philanthropy” In Charles T. Clotfelter and Thomas Ehrlich, eds., Philanthropy and the Nonprofit Sector in a Changing America. Bloomington, IN : Indiana University Press, 122—130.
42.
Leonhardt, David.2004. “More Americans Were Uninsured and Poor in 2003, Census Find.” New York Times, August 27: A1.
Mills, C. Wright.1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York : Oxford University Press.
45.
Pifer, Alan.1984. Philanthropy in an Age of Transition: The Essays of Alan Pifer. New York: Foundation Center .
46.
Porterfield, Amanda.2003. “Protestant Missionaries: Pioneers of American Philanthropy .” In Lawrence J. Friedman and Mark D. McGarvie, eds., Charity, Philanthropy, and Civility in American History. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press, 49—69.
47.
“ Relief Agency Criticizes Rich Lands.” 2004. New York Times, December 6: A12.
48.
Research Unit for Political Economy, Mumbai.2003. “The Economics and Politics of the World Social Forum.” Aspects of India's Economy35 (September).
49.
Roberts, Sam.2004. Who We Are Now: The Changing Face of America in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Times Books/ Henry Holt & Company.
Roelofs, Joan.2003. Foundations and Public Policy: The Mask of Pluralism . Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
57.
Sealander, Judith.2003. “Curing Evils at their Source: The Arrival of Scientific Giving,” In Lawrence J. Friedman and Mark D. McGarvie, eds., Charity, Philanthropy, and Civility in American History. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press, 217—239.
58.
Shiva, Vananda.1991. The Violence of the Green Revolution: Third World Agriculture, Ecology, and Politics. London: Zed Books.
59.
Strom, Stephanie.2004a. “Charitable Giving Holds Steady, Report Finds.” New York Times, June 23: A10.
60.
———. 2004b. “Charities Face Increased Reviews by I.R.S. as Senate Considers Strengthening Oversight.” New York Times, June 23: A12.
61.
———. 2004c. “A.C.L.U. Rejects Foundation Grants Over Terror Language.” New York Times, October 19: A17.
62.
Thomas, Franklin A.1979. President's Review. In Ford Foundation 1979 Annual Report. New York: Ford Foundation.
63.
Unicef.2004. The State of the World's Children in 2005: Children Under Threat. Retrieved 10 December 2004 (http://www.unicef.org).
64.
Walsh. Frank.1989. “The Great Foundations.” N.D. unpublished manuscript. Cited in James Weinstein, The Corporate Ideal in the Liberal State. Boston, MA: Beacon Press .
65.
World Bank.2003. World Development Indicators. New York: World Bank .
