This article presents selected features of a theoretical schema we term the distributional model of class analysis which views large organizations, organizationally-based resources, and distributional processes as central to the US class structure. We first review what we term production models of class analysis and illustrate how some features of these models may be linked to insights from studies of class involving large organizations and distributional processes. Building on this foundation, we introduce the main ideas of our model and focus on two central features: generative capital and the distributive order . We identify four forms of generative capital as the basis of class membership: consumption, investment, credentialed skill, and social. Classes are viewed as consisting of individuals and families who possess, over time, similar levels of these resources. The class structure is illustrated with a figure divided into the privileged (top 20 percent) and new working classes (bottom 80 percent) which are posited as having oppositional class interests. We then identify four elements of the distributive order and discuss how each influences the distribution of generative capital forms to individuals and families. We conclude with a discussion of the merits of our model and with illustrations of new lines of inquiry in class analysis the model could stimulate.
Abrahamson, Mark. 1973. “ Functionalism and the Functional Theory of Stratification: An Empirical Assessment .” American Journal of Sociology78(5):1236—1246.
2.
———. 1979. “A Functional Theory of Organizational Stratification .” Social Forces58(1): 128—145.
3.
Baron, James N. and William T Bielby .1980. “Bringing the Firms Back In: Stratification, Segmentation, and the Organization of Work.” American Sociological Review45(5):737—765.
4.
Berman, Jay M.2004. “Industry Output and Employment Projections to 2012 .” Monthly Labor Review127(February):58—79.
5.
Bernhardt, Annette, Martina Morris, Mark S. Handcock, and Marc A. Scott .2001. Divergent Paths: Economic Mobility in the New American Labor Market. New York: Russell Sage.
6.
Bernstein, Aaron.2001. “Back on the Edge.” Business Week, April 23:42—43.
7.
———. 2003. “Waking Up from the American Dream.” Business Week, December 1:54—58.
8.
Blau, Peter and Otis D. Duncan .1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9.
Bourdieu, Pierre.1984. Distinction. Translated by Richard Nice. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
10.
Breiger, Ronald L.1995. “Social Structure and the Phenomenology of Attainment .” Annual Review of Sociology21:115—36.
11.
Clark, Terry N. and Seymour M. Lipset .1991. “Are Social Classes Dying?” International Sociology6(4):397—410.
12.
Collins, Chuck and Felice Yeskel.2000. Economic Apartheid in America. New York: The New Press.
13.
Congressional Budget Office.2001. “ Historical Effective Tax Rates, 1979—1997.” Congress of the United States. Washington, DC.
14.
Conley, Dalton.2001. “Capital for College: Parental Assets and Postsecondary Schooling.” Sociology of Education74(1):59—72.
15.
Crompton, Rosemary, Fiona Devine, Mike Savage, and John Scott (eds.). 2000. Renewing Class Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
16.
Dahrendorf, Ralf.1959. Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
17.
Davies, Scott and Neil Guppy.1997. “Fields of Study, College Selectivity, and Student Inequalities in Higher Education.” Social Forces75(4):1417—1438.
18.
Davis, Kingsley.1948. Human Societies. New York: Macmillan.
19.
Davis, Kingsley and Wilbert Moore.1945. “Some Principles of Stratification .” American Sociological Review10(2):242—249.
20.
Domhoff, G. William.2006. Who Rules America: Power, Politics, and Social Change . Fifth Edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
21.
Erickson, Bonnie H.1996. “Culture, Class, and Connections.” American Journal of Sociology102(1):217—251.
22.
Erikson, Robert and John H. Goldthorpe .1992. The Constant Flux. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
23.
Fernandez, Roberto M., Emilio Castilla, and Paul Moore.2000. “Social Capital at Work: Networks and Employment at a Phone Center.” American Journal of Sociology105(5):1288—1356.
24.
Gilbert, Dennis.2003. The American Class Structure in an Age of Growing Inequality . Sixth Edition. Belmont : Wadsworth.
25.
Goldthorpe, John H.1987. Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain . Oxford: Clarendon Press.
26.
———. 2002. “Globalisation and Social Class.” West European Politics25(3):1—28.
27.
Granfield, Robert and Thomas Koenig.1992. “Pathways into Elite Law Firms: Professional Stratification and Social Networks.” Research in Politics and Society: The Political Consequences of Social Networks4:325—351.
28.
Grusky, David B. and Jesper B. Sorensen .1998. “Can Class Analysis Be Salvaged?” American Journal of Sociology103(5):1187—1234.
29.
Hagedorn, John.1998. People and Folks: Gangs, Crime and the Underclass in a Rustbelt City. Second Edition. Chicago: Lake View Press.
30.
Hall, Richard H.1994. The Sociology of Work. Thousand Oaks : Pine Forge Press.
31.
Hearn, James.1991. “Academic and Nonacademic Influences on the College Destinations of 1980 High School Graduates.” Sociology of Education64(3):158—171.
32.
Hecker, Daniel E.2001. “Occupational Employment.” Monthly Labor Review124 (November): 57—84.
33.
Hirschberg, David.2002. “The Anatomy of the Job-Generation Issue and Its Impact on Health Insurance Policy.” International Journal of Health Services32(1):107—23.
34.
Hodson, Randy and Teresa A. Sullivan.2002. The Social Organization of Work. Third Edition. Belmont: Wadsworth- Thompson.
35.
Kalleberg, Arne L., David Knoke, Peter V. Marsden, and Joe L. Spaeth .1996. Organizations in America: Analyzing Their Structures and Human Resource Practices. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
36.
Kerbo, Harold R.2006. Social Stratification and Inequality. Sixth Edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
37.
Kingston, Paul W.1994. “Are There Classes in the United States? ” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility13:3—41.
38.
———. 2000. The Classless Society. Stanford : Stanford University Press.
39.
Light, Ivan.2004. “Social Capital for What?” Pp. 19—33 in Community-Based Organizations: The Intersection of Social Capital and Local Context in Contemporary Urban Society, edited by Robert M. Silverman.Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
40.
Lin, Nan.1999. “Building a Network Theory of Social Capital ,” Connections22(1):28—51.
41.
Marger, Martin M.2005. Social Inequality: Patterns and Processes. Third Edition. Boston: McGraw Hill.
42.
Messner, Steven F., Eric P. Baumer, and Richard Rosenfeld .2004. “Dimensions of Social Capital and Rates of Criminal Homicide.” American Sociological Review69(6):882—903.
43.
Miliband, Ralph.1989. Divided Societies: Class Struggle in Contemporary Capitalism . Oxford: Clarendon Press .
44.
Mills, C. Wright.1956. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
Mishel, Lawrence, Jared Bernstein, and Sylvia Allegretto .2005. The State of Working America 2004—2005. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
46.
Navarro, Vicente.2002. “A Critique of Social Capital.” International Journal of Health Services32(3):423—432.
47.
Parsons, Talcott.1951. The Social System. New York : Free Press.
48.
Perrow, Charles.1991. “A Society of Organizations.” Theory and Society20(6):725—762.
49.
———. 2000. “An Organizational Analysis of Organizational Theory .” Contemporary Sociology29(3):469—76.
50.
Perrucci, Robert and Earl Wysong.1999. The New Class Society. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
51.
———. 2003. The New Class Society: Goodbye American Dream? . Second Edition. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield .
52.
———. 2008. The New Class Society: Goodbye American Dream? Third edition. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield .
53.
Phillips, Kevin.2004. American Dynasty. New York: Penguin Books.
54.
Phillips, Peter.2004. Censored 2005: The Top 25 Censored Stories. New York: Seven Stories Press.
55.
Reid, Lesley W. and Beth A. Rubin .2003. “Integrating Economic Dualism and Labor Market Segmentation: The Effects of Race, Gender, and Structural Location on Earnings, 1974—2000.” Sociological Quarterly44(3):405—432.
56.
Ritzer, George.1992. Sociological Theory. Third Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
57.
Scott, Janny and David Leonhardt .2005. “Class in America: Shadowy Lines That Still Divide .” New York Times, May 15:A1, A16-A18.
58.
Simon, David R. and D. Stanley Eitzen .1993. Elite Deviance. Fourth Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
59.
Sorensen, Aage B.2000a. “Toward a Sounder Basis for Class Analysis .” American Journal of Sociology105(6):1523—1558.
60.
———. 2000b. “Employment Relations and Class Structure .” Pp. 16—42 in Renewing Class Analysis, edited by Rosemary Crompton, Fiona Devine, Mike Savage, and John Scott.Malden: Blackwell.
61.
Stinchcombe, Arthur.1989. “Education, Exploitation, and Class Consciousness .” Pp. 168—72 in The Debate on Classes, edited by Eric O. Wright.New York: Verso.
62.
Strobel, Frederick R. and Wallace C. Peterson .1999. The Coming Class War and How to Avoid It. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe .
63.
US Census Bureau.2005. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2004—2005. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office.
64.
Weeden, Kim A. and David B. Grusky .2005. “The Case for a New Class Map.” American Journal of Sociology111(1):141—212.
65.
Westergaard, John.1995. Who Gets What? The Hardening of Class Inequality in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Polity Press.
66.
Wooldridge, Adrian.2005. “Ever Higher Society, Ever Harder to Ascend: Whatever Happened to the Belief that Any American Could Get to the Top?” The Economist January 1:22—24.
67.
Wright, Erik Olin.1979. Class Structure and Income Determination. New York: Academic Press.
68.
———. 1985. Classes. New York: Verso.
69.
———. 1997. Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70.
———. 2000. “Class, Exploitation, and Economic Rents: Reflections on Sorensen's `Sounder Basis.'” American Journal of Sociology105(6):1559—1571.
71.
Wysong, Earl.1992. High Risk and High Stakes: Health Professionals, Politics, and Policy. Westport: Greenwood Press.
72.
Wysong, Earl and David W. Wright .2003a. “Are the Kids Alright?: Recent Trends in Intergenerational Mobility.” Paper presented at the Midwest Sociological Society Meetings, Chicago, Illinois.
73.
———. 2003b. “Family Friendly Workplace Benefits: The U.S., Canada, and Europe.” Critical Sociology29(3):337—367.
74.
Zachary, G. Pascal and Bob Ortega.1993. “Age of Angst: Workplace Productivity Boosts Productivity at Cost of Job Security.” Wall Street Journal, March 10:A1, A8.
75.
Zey, Mary and Tami Swenson.1999. “The Transformation of the Dominant Corporate Form From Multidivisional to Multisubsidiary: The Role of the 1986 Tax Reform Act.” Sociological Quarterly40(2):241—267.
