The article pursues three main objectives. First, I review and clarify the core philosophical foundations of Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of practice and Patricia H. Collins’s intersectional theory. Second, I examine the proximity of these two epistemological frameworks by comparing them with concrete references and practical examples. Finally, I investigate the synergistic possibilities of integrating the two political theories, highlighting conceptual and methodological gaps that further integration could address. This comparative analysis provides the groundwork for effectively developing an intersectional theory of practice.
AhmedAli M.AnderssonLinaHammarstedtMats. 2013. “Are Gay Men and Lesbians Discriminated against in the Hiring Process?”Southern Economic Association79(3):565–85. doi:10.4284/0038-4038-2011.317.
AnagnostAnn. 2004. “The Corporeal Politics of Quality (Suzhi).”Public Culture16(2):189–208. doi:10.1215/08992363-16-2-189.
4.
BaileyApril H.LaFranceMarianneDovidioJohn F.2019. “Is Man the Measure of All Things? A Social Cognitive Account of Androcentrism.”Personality and Social Psychology Review23(4):307–31. doi:10.1177/1088868318782848.
5.
BenjaminWalter. [1935] 1969. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Pp. 1–26 in Illuminations, edited by HArendt. New York, NY: Schocken Books.
6.
BourdieuPierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” Pp. 241–58 in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by J.Richardson. New York, NY: Greenwood.
7.
BourdieuPierre. 1987. “What Makes a Social Class? On the Theoretical and Practical Existence of Groups.”Berkeley Journal of Sociology32:1–17.
8.
BourdieuPierre. 1991. “Genesis and Structure of the Religious Field.”Comparative Social Research13:1–44.
9.
BourdieuPierre. 1997. Razones Prácticas. Sobre la teoría de la acción. Barcelona, Spain: Anagrama.
BourdieuPierre. 2000b. La Dominación Masculina. Barcelona, Spain: Anagrama.
12.
BourdieuPierre. 2000c. Pascalian Meditations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
BourdieuPierre. 2008. El Sentido Práctico. Madrid, Spain: Siglo Veintiuno.
14.
BourdieuPierreDarbelAlainRivetJean-PaulSeibelClaud. 1964. Travail et travailleurs en Algérie. Paris: Mouton.
15.
BourdieuPierreWacquantLoïc D.1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: Polity Press.
16.
BuckleyThomasGottliebAlma. 1988. Blood Magic: The Anthropology of Menstruation. Berkley: University of California Press.
17.
Carrasco-CarpioConcepción. 2017. “Immigration and Economic Crisis: An Analysis of the Impact in Spain, 2007–2013.”Critical Sociology43(7–8):1161–77. doi:10.1177/0896920515624746.
18.
CarverTerrell. 2022. “Engels Theorizes Gender Hierarchy in the Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State.” Pp. 211–27 in Friedrich Engels for the 21st Century. Marx, Engels, and Marxisms, edited by T.CarverRapicS.Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
19.
ChoSumiCrenshawKimberlé W.McCallLeslie. 2013. “Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis.”Signs38(4):785–810. doi:10.1086/669608.
20.
CollinsPatricia H.1986. “Learning from the Outsider within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought.”Social Problems33(6):s14–32. doi:10.2307/800672.
21.
CollinsPatricia H.2000. Black Feminist Thought. Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
CrenshawKimberlé. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.”Stanford Law Review43(6):1241–99.
24.
DavisAngela. 2016. Freedom Is a Constant Struggle. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
25.
DiamondAshiagbor. 2021. “Race and Colonialism in the Construction of Labour Markets and Precarity.”Industrial Law Journal50(4):506–31. doi:10.1093/indlaw/dwab020.
26.
DouglasMary. 1996. Thought Styles: Critical Essays on Good Taste. London: Sage.
27.
Fernández-GarcíaMercedesMolinero-GerbeauYoanSajirZakaria. 2023. “‘They Think You Belong to Them’: Migrant Workers’ Perspectives on Labour Exploitation in Spain.”Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies49(15):3976–95. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2023.2235896.
GBD 2019 Police Violence U.S. Subnational Collaborators. 2021. “Fatal Police Violence by Race and State in the USA, 1980–2019: A Network Meta-regression.”The Lancet398(10307):1239–55. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01609-3.
HarawayDonna J.1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.”Feminist Studies14(3):575–99.
33.
HarrelStevan. 2023. An Ecological History of Modern China. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
34.
HeideggerMartin. [1927] 1962. Being and Time. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
35.
JamesSelma. 2012. Sex, Race and Class. The Perspective of Winning. A Selection of Writings 1952-2011. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
36.
JohnsonPaul. 2011. “Challenging the Heteronormativity of Marriage: The Role of Judicial Interpretation and Authority.”Social & Legal Studies20(3):349–67. doi:10.1177/0964663911406314.
37.
LeachEdmund. 1976. Culture & Communication: The Logic by Which Symbols Are Connected. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
LiuLidia H.KarlRebecca E.KoDorothy. 2013. The Birth of Chinese Feminism: Essential Texts in Transnational Theory. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
40.
LobelOrly. 2003. “Family Geographies: Global Care Chains, Transnational Parenthood, and New Legal Challenges in an Era of Labour Globalization.” Pp. 383–400 in Law and Geography, Current Legal Issues, edited by JHolderHarrisonC.Oxford, UK: Oxford Academic.
41.
LovellTerry. 2004. “Bourdieu, Class and Gender: ‘The Return of the Living Dead’?”The Sociological Review52(2):37–56. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00523.x.
42.
MarxKarl. [1867] 1976. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. I. London: Penguin Books.
43.
MayesRobyn M.KoshyPaul. 2018. “Transnational Labour Migration and the Place of Reproductive Labour: Trailing Wives and Community Support in Boddington.”Work, Employment & Society32(4):670–86. doi:10.1177/0950017017702602.
44.
Merleau-PontyMaurice. [1945] 2002. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.
45.
MorenoIsidoro. 2011. “Los papeles posibles de la antropología en tiempos de golcalización.”Revista Andaluza de Antropología1:2–25. doi:10.12795/RAA.2011.i01.01.
46.
MorganKathryn P.1996. “Describing the Emperor’s New Clothes: Three Myths of Educational (In-)Equality.” Pp. 105–21 in The Gender Question in Education: Theory, Pedagogy, & Politics, edited by A.DillerHoustonB.MorganK.AyimM.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
47.
ReiterRayna R.1975. Toward an Anthropology of Women. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
48.
RodgersWilliam M.III. 2019. “Race in the Labor Market: The Role of Equal Employment Opportunity and Other Policies.”RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences5(5):198–220. doi:10.7758/RSF.2019.5.5.10.
49.
SapolskyRobert. 2018. Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst. London: Vintage.
50.
SeimJoshMcCarthyMichael A.2023. “Classes without Labor: Three Critiques of Bourdieu.”Critical Sociology. doi:10.1177/08969205231200898.
51.
SpivakGayatri C.2012. In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. New York, NY: Routledge.
52.
StollerSilvia. 2017. “What Is Feminist Phenomenology: Looking Backward and into the Future.” Pp. 328–55 in Feminist Phenomenology Futures, edited by H. A.FieldingOkowskiD. E.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
53.
TatliAhuÖzbilginMustafa. 2012. “An Emic Approach to Intersectional Study of Diversity at Work: A Bourdieuan Framing.”International Journal of Management Reviews14:180–200. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00326.x.
54.
WeberMax. [1930] 1950. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Butler & Tanner.
55.
YepGust A.2016. “Toward Thick(er) Intersectionalities: Theorizing, Researching, and Activating the Complexities of Communication and Identities.” Pp. 86–94 in Globalizing Intercultural Communication: A Reader, edited by K.SorrellsSekimotoS.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
