This paper argues that Marxian class analysis and critical poststructuralism are not merely compatible theoretical approaches, but different trajectories of the same general method; where post-structuralistism takes apart cultural products to illustrate their contradictions, biases and silences, class analysis seeks to deconstruct economic arrangements in order to identify their social construction, concrete power implications and potential rupture. The theoretical questions are explored in the context of particular historical and political challenges: the impact of Soviet orthodoxy, the challenge of new social movements, and the ongoing crisis of the Left despite the re-emergence of a diverse and vibrant anti-capitalist movement.
Bannerji, Himani.1995. Thinking Through: Essays on Feminism, Marxism and Anti-Racism . Toronto: Women's Press .
2.
Butler, Judith.1998. “Merely Cultural.” New Left Review227(January—February): 33—44.
3.
Cleaver, Harry.1993. “Interview with Massimo de Angelis.” Vis-a-vis1(Autumn): 79—100.
4.
——. 2000. Reading `Capital' Politically. Edinburgh : AK Press.
5.
Clement, Wallace and John Myles.1994. Relations of Ruling: Class and Gender in Post-Industrial Societies. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
6.
Dalla Costa, Mariarosa and Selma James.1973. The Power of Women and the Subversion of the Community. Bristol: Falling Wall Press.
7.
Dunk, Thomas W.1991. It's a Working Man's Town. Montréal : McGill University Press.
8.
Foucault, Michel.1978. The History of Sexuality, vol. 1. New York: Pantheon.
9.
Fraser, Nancy.1995. “From Redistribution to Recognition: Dilemmas of Justice in a `Post-Socialist' Age.” New Left Review212( July—August):68—93.
10.
——. 2000. “Why Overcoming Prejudice is Not Enough.” Critical Horizons1(1):21—28.
11.
Hardt, Micheal and Antonio Negri.1994. Labor of Dionysus: A Critique of the State-Form. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
12.
Hennessy, Rosemary.1996. “Queer Theory, Left Politics.” Pp. 214—242 in Marxism beyond Marxism, edited by Saree Makdisi , Cesare Casarino, and Rebecca E. Karl.London and New York. NY: Routledge .
13.
Hill Collins, Patricia.1998. “Toward a New Vision: Race, Class and Gender as Categories of Analysis and Connection.” Pp. 231—247 in Social Class and Stratification: Classic Statements and Theoretical Debates , edited by Rhonda Levine.Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
14.
Hooks, Bell.1993. “Postmodern Blackness.” Pp. 510—518 in A Postmodern Reader, edited by Joseph Natoli and Linda Hutcheon.New York. NY: SUNY Press.
15.
Huntington, Samuel P.1975. “The United States.” Pp. 59—118 in The Crisis of Democracy, edited by Michel Crozier, Samuel P. Huntington, and Joji Watnuki.New York. NY: New York University Press.
16.
Ingraham, Chrys.1994. “The Heterosexual Imaginary: Feminist Sociology and Theories of Gender.” Sociological Theory12(2):203—219.
17.
James, C.L.R.1992. The CLR James Reader. Oxford : Blackwell Publishers.
18.
Joppke, Christian.1987. “The Crisis of the Welfare State, Collective Consumption, and the Rise of New Social Actors.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology32:237—260.
19.
Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe.1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
20.
Midnight Notes Collective.1990. The New Enclosures. Jamaica Plain: Midnight Notes.
21.
Negri, Antonio.1991. Marx Beyond Marx. New York. NY: Autonomedia.
22.
O'Connor, James.1973. The Fiscal Crisis of the State. New York. NY: St. Martins Press.
23.
Phillips, Ron.1985. “The Failure of Keynesianism and the Collapse of Bretton Woods.” Research in Political Economy8:1—25
24.
Plotke, David.1990. “What's So New About `New Social Movements' ?” Socialist Review20(1):81—102.
25.
Rorty, Richard.2000. “Is `Cultural Recognition' a Useful Concept for Leftist Politics?” Critical Horizons1(1):7—20.
26.
Teeple.2000. Globalization and the Decline of Social Reform. Toronto : Garamond Press.
27.
Tronti, Mario.1972. “Workers and Capital” in Telos14(Winter):25—62.
