Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article challenges longstanding trends in the British sociology of class by drawing on insights drawn from class composition analysis and applying them to Luton, UK, the site of the original affluent worker study. Class composition has received little attention from sociologists, though neo-Weberian and cultural approaches struggle to grapple with the relationship between deindustrialisation, social reproduction, migration and class. This is because both approaches are (1) methodologically nationalist; (2) concerned primarily with subjective identification with a class, and (3) ahistorical in their theory building. Class composition offers a means of mediating between the objective and subjective dimensions of class. This demonstrates how class has changed in response to the demands for continued surplus-value creation through waged and unwaged work. Finally, the article will take a historical view of Luton’s class composition as a way to demonstrate how the approach can offer an alternative to the sociology of class.

Keywords

sociology class deindustrialisation Marxism cultural class analysis autonomism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

Rose

Hinden

(1960) Must Labour Lose? Penguin.

Alcoff

(2015) Autonomism in theory and practice. Science & Society 79(2): 221–242.

Bell

(1988) The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties. Harvard University Press.

Bergman

Joye

(2005) Comparing social stratification schemata: CAMSIS, CSP-CH, Goldthorpe, ISCO-08, Treiman, and Wright. Cambridge Studies in Social Research 10: 1–35.

Braverman

(1998 [1973]) Labour and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. Monthly Review Press.

Bourdieu

(1987) What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 32: 1–17.

Burawoy

(1982) Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism. Chicago University Press.

Calhoun

(1993) Habitus, field, and capital: the question of historical specificity. In: Calhoun

LiPuma

Postone

(eds) Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives. Polity Press, pp.61–88.

Cebula

Collingwood

Earwaker

, et al. (2023) UK Poverty 2023. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Available at: https://files.localgov.co.uk/jrf_638103267396801742.pdf

10.

Chan

Goldthorpe

(2007) Class and status: the conceptual distinction and its empirical relevance. American Sociological Review 72: 512–532.

11.

Crouch

(1999) Social Change in Western Europe. Oxford University Press.

12.

Devine

(1992) Affluent Workers Revisited: Privatism and the Working Class. Edinburgh University Press.

13.

Devine

Savage

(2015) BBC Great British Class Survey 2011–2013. UK Data Service. Available at: https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/studies/study?id=7616 (accessed 13 January 2023).

14.

DiMaggio

(1979) Review essay: on Pierre Bourdieu. American Journal of Sociology 84(6): 1460–1474.

15.

Durou

(2020) Class is what capitalism makes of it: challenging the lure of “realism” in mainstream class analysis. Critical Sociology 46(2): 207–223.

16.

Dyer

Stygall

Dony

(1966) The Story of Luton. White Crescent Press.

17.

Edwards

(1990) Understanding conflict in the labour process: the logic and autonomy of struggle. In: Knights

Willmott

(eds) Labour Process Theory. Macmillan, pp.125–152.

18.

Elster

(2016) Sour Grapes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Erikson

Goldthorpe

(1992) The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Clarendon Press.

20.

Evans

Mills

(1998) Identifying class structure: a latent class analysis of the criterion-related and construct validity of the Goldthorpe class schema. European Sociological Review 14(1): 87–106.

21.

Federici

(2014) The reproduction of labour power in the global economy and the unfinished feminist revolution. In: Atzeni

(ed.) Workers and Labour in a Globalised Capitalism: Contemporary Themes and Theoretical Issues. Palgrave Macmillan, pp.85–110.

22.

Giddens

(1986) The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies. Hutchinson.

23.

Goldthorpe

Lockwood

(1963) Affluence and the British class structure. The Sociological Review 11(2): 133–163.

24.

Goldthorpe

Lockwood

Bechhofer

, et al. (1969) The Affluent Worker in the Class Structure. Cambridge University Press.

25.

Gray

(2022) Rethinking Italian autonomist Marxism: spatial composition, urban contestation, and the material geographies of social reproduction. Antipode 54(3): 800–824.

26.

Hoctor

Almeida

(2025) Reproduction, the care sector and the question of unproductive labour in Braverman’s Labour and Monopoly Capital. New Proposals: Journal of Marxism and Interdisciplinary Inquiry 14(1): 1–24.

27.

Holden

(2003) Vauxhall Motors and the Luton Economy 1900–2002. Bedfordshire Historical Record Society.

28.

Holmes

(2022) Employment and Earnings in Luton. Luton Borough Council. Available at: https://www.luton.gov.uk/Community_and_living/Lists/LutonDocuments/PDF/observatory/employment-earnings-report.pdf (accessed 25 July 2022).

29.

Hughes

(2023) Luton MP warns of “Dickensian” conditions for families living in poverty. Luton Today. 3 January. Available at: https://www.lutontoday.co.uk/news/people/luton-mp-warns-of-dickensian-conditions-for-families-living-in-poverty-3972508 (accessed 15 March 2023).

30.

International Labour Organization (2019) The Global Labour Income Share and Distribution: Data Production and Analysis Unit. July. Geneva: International Labour Organization. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/ilostat-files/Documents/Labour%20income%20share%20and%20distribution.pdf (accessed 5 September 2022).

31.

Jelin

(1974) The concept of working-class embourgeoisement. Comparative International Development 9(1): 1–19.

32.

Jones

Muldoon

(2022) Rise and Grind: Microwork and Hustle Culture in the UK. Autonomy. Available at: https://autonomy.work/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/riseandgrind11.pdf (accessed 01 October 2025).

33.

Lipset

(1964) The changing class structure and contemporary European politics. Daedalus 93(1): 271–303.

34.

Littler

(1990) The labour process debate: a theoretical review. In: Knights

Willmott

(eds) Labour Process Theory. Macmillan, pp.46–94.

35.

Lonergan

(2015) Migrant women and social reproduction under austerity. Feminist Review 109(1): 124–145.

36.

Mail Online (2004) Luton voted most awful place in Britain. Mail Online. 26 September. Available at: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-319288/Luton-voted-awful-place-Britain.html (accessed 25 May 2022).

37.

Marčeta

(2021) Platform capitalism-towards the neo-commodification of labour? In: Haidar

Keune

(eds) Work and Labour Relations in Global Platform Capitalism. Edward Elgar, pp.69–92.

38.

Mark-Lawson

(1988) Occupational segregation and women’s politics. In: Walby

(ed.) Gender Segregation at Work. Open University Press, pp.157–173.

39.

Marmot

Alexander

Allen

, et al. (2022) Reducing Health Inequalities in Luton: A Marmot Town. Institute of Health Equity.

40.

McDowell

(2009) Working Bodies: Interactive Service Employment and Workplace Identities. Wiley-Blackwell.

41.

McDowell

Rootham

Hardgrove

(2014) Precarious work, protest masculinity and communal regulation: South Asian young men in Luton, UK. Work, Employment and Society 28(6): 847–864.

42.

Mills

(2014) The Great British Class Fiasco: a comment on Savage et al. Sociology 48(3): 437–444.

43.

Mohandesi

(2013) Class consciousness or class composition? Science & Society 77(1): 72–97.

44.

Mondon

Winter

(2020) Reactionary Democracy: How Racism and the Populist Far Right Became Mainstream. Verso.

45.

Neilson

Rossiter

(2008) Precarity as a political concept, or, Fordism as exception. Theory, Culture & Society 25(7–8): 51–72.

46.

Nichols

(1999) Industrial sociology and the labour process. In: Beynon

Glavanis

(eds) Patterns of Social Inequality. Longman, pp.109–119.

47.

Notes from Below Collective (2018) The Workers’ Inquiry and Social Composition. Notes From Below. Available at: https://notesfrombelow.org/article/workers-inquiry-and-social-composition (accessed 3 December 2024).

48.

Office for National Statistics (2023) How Life Has Changed in Luton: Census 2021. 19 January. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/visualisations/censusareachanges/E06000032/ (accessed 15 March 2021).

49.

Panzieri

(1976) Surplus value and planning: notes on the reading of capital. The Labour Process and Class Strategies: Conference of Socialist Economists Pamphlet 1: 4–25.

50.

Pietrykowksi

(2019) Work. Polity Press.

51.

Pike

(2022) Coping with deindustrialization in the global North and South. International Journal of Urban Sciences 26(1): 1–22.

52.

Pitts

(2024) Contemporary class composition analysis: the politics of production and the autonomy of the political. Capital & Class 48(1): 23–48.

53.

Robertson

(2016) “Town at the end of humanity”: Luton named as worst place in the UK on an internet forum…. Mail Online. 18 January. Available at: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3404822/Reddit-users-Luton-worst-place-live-UK.html (accessed 25 May 2022).

54.

Rye

(2019) Transnational spaces of class: international migrants’ multilocal, inconsistent and instable class positions. Current Sociology 67(1): 27–46.

55.

Savage

(2016) The fall and rise of class analysis in British sociology 1950–2016. Tempo Social 28: 57–72.

56.

Savage

Mouncey

(2015) Social Class in the 21st Century. Pelican.

57.

Savage

Devine

Cunningham

, et al. (2013) A new model of social class? Findings from the BBC’s Great British Class Survey experiment. Sociology 47(2): 219–250.

58.

Savage

Warde

Devine

(2005) Capitals, assets and resources: some critical issues. British Journal of Sociology 56(1): 31–48.

59.

Seim

McCarthy

(2023) Classes without labor: three critiques of Bourdieu. Critical Sociology. Epub ahead of print 25 September 2023. DOI: 10.1177/089692052312008.

60.

Smith

(2015) Continuity and change in labor process analysis forty years after. Labor and Monopoly Capital. Labor Studies Journal 40(3): 222–242.

61.

Toscano

(2004) Factory, territory, metropolis, empire. Angelaki 9(2): 197–216.

62.

Toscano

Woodcock

(2015) Specters of Marxism: a comment on Savage’s market model of class difference. The Sociological Review 63: 512–523.

63.

Tregenna

(2018) Deindustrialization and premature deindustrialization. In: Reinert

Ghosh

Kattel

(eds) Elgar Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Development. Edward Elgar, pp.710–729.

64.

Tronti

(2013) Factory and Society. Operaismo in English. Available at: https://operaismoinenglish.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/factory-and-society.pdf (accessed 19 June 2025).

65.

Tronti

(2019) Workers and Capital. Verso.

66.

Tronti

(2020) The Autonomy of the Political. Viewpoint. Available at: https://viewpointmag.com/2020/02/26/the-autonomy-of-the-political/ (accessed 17 June 2025).

67.

Vauxhall Motors (2012) About Vauxhall. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20120806025240/http://www.vauxhall.co.uk/about-vauxhall/company-information/about-us.html (accessed 14 March 2023).

68.

Venture Residential (2022) The Future of the Luton Buy-To-Let Market in 2022. Venture Residential. Available at: https://www.venture-residential.co.uk/blog/132-the-future-of-the-luton-buy-to-let-market-in-2022 (accessed 19 January 2022).

69.

Winant

(2021) The Next Shift: The Fall of Industry and the Rise of Health Care in Rust Belt America. Harvard University Press.

70.

Woodcock

(2014) The workers’ inquiry from Trotskyism to Operaismo: a political methodology for investigating the workplace. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 14(3): 493–513.

71.

Wright

(2002) Storming Heaven: Class Composition and Struggle in Italian Autonomist Marxism. Pluto.

72.

Zweig

(1961) The Worker in an Affluent Society: Family Life And Industry. Heinemann.

Whatever happened to the affluent worker? Deindustrialisation,the British sociology of class and class composition in Luton,UK

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References