Society, government, and the economy have a direct impact on the condition and availability of facilities at public colleges and universities across the country. This article explores the factors that have led to the current state of facilities and specific attention is given campus recreation facilities. Strategies for addressing the backlog of deferred maintenance are included. Stakeholders need to work collaboratively to ensure an institution has the recreation facilities needed for the campus.
GumportP. J., & SpornB. (1998). The organizational dynamics of privatization in public research universities: When privatization hits the (garbage) can. In: Institutional adaptation: Demands for management reform and university administration.
5.
HigniteK. (2006). Sweat equity. [Electronic version]. Business Officer Magazine, 39(6).
6.
JennyH., HughesG.C., & WynnG.R. (1982). Taking capital requirements into account. FrancesC. (Ed.) Successful responses to financial difficulty.New Directions for Higher Education, 38, 39–44.
7.
JohnstoneD.B. (2006). Financing higher education: Cost-sharing in an international perspective.Boston: Boston College and Sense Publishers.
8.
KaiserH.H. (1979). Mortgaging the future: The cost of deferring maintenance.Washington, DC: Association of Physical Plant Administrators.
9.
KaiserH.H. (1980). Deferred maintenance. KaiserH. H. (Ed.) Managing facilities more effectively. New Directions for Higher Education, 30(2), 41–54.
10.
KaiserH.H. (1984). Crumbling academe: Solving the capital renewal and replacement dilemma.Washington, DC: Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges.
11.
KaiserH.H. (1993). The facilities audit: A process for improving facilities conditions.Alexandria, VA: Association of Higher Education Facilities Officers.
12.
KaiserH.H. (2004). Reviewing the state of deferred maintenance. Facilities Manager, 6, 14–21.
13.
KaiserH.H., & KleinE. (2000). Facilities management. In National Association of College and University Business Officers (Ed.), College & university business administration (6th ed.) (pp. 131–1390). Washington, DC: National Association of College and University Business Officers.
14.
KennedyM. (2007). The good life. American School & University, 2, 34–36.
15.
KleinE., & AugustineJ.H. (2000). Debt financing and management. In National Association of College and University Business Officers (Ed.), College & university business administration (6th ed.) (pp. 101–1080). Washington, DC: National Association of College and University Business Officers.
16.
KocherE. (2003). Phase won [Electronic version]. Athletic Business, April 2003.
17.
LayzellD.T., & LyddonJ.W. (1990). Budgeting for higher education at the state level: Enigma, paradox, and ritual. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4.Washington D.C.: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
18.
LeeJ., & CleryS. (2004). Key trends in higher education. American Academic, 1(1), 21–36.
19.
LidskyA.J. (2002). A perspective on campus planning. New Directions for Higher Education, 119, 69–76.
20.
McKeown-MoakM.P. (2001). Financing higher education in the new century: The third Annual report from the states. State Higher Education Executive Officers Project of SHEEO and MGT of America.
21.
MillettJ.D. (1955). Recent developments in financing higher education. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 301, 205–210.
22.
NoyesB. (2003). Internal revenue [Electronic version]. Athletic Business, October 2003.
23.
RhoadsG., & SlaughterS. (2006). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Privatization and shifting the target of public subsidy in higher education. In RhoadsG., & TorresC.A. (Eds.), The university, state, and market: The political economy of globalization in the Americas.CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
SaundersL.E. (1989). The politics of budgeting for deferred maintenance. KaiserH. H. (Ed.) Planning and managing higher education facilities.New Directions for Institutional Research, 61, 77-88.
25.
SchawW.A. (1989). The time bomb continues to tick. Educational Record, 70(1), 8–11.
26.
TaylorH., CanningW. F., BrailsfordP., & RokoszF. (2003). Financial issues in campus recreation. New Directions for Student Services, 103, 73–86.
27.
ThelinJ.R. (2004). A history of American higher education.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28.
WeertsD.J. (2002). State governments and research universities: A framework for a renewed partnership.New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
29.
ZumetaW. (2004). State higher education financing: Demand imperatives meet structural, cyclical, and political constraints. St. JohnE. P., & ParsonsM. D. (Eds.) Public funding of higher education: Changing contexts and new rationales.Baltimore, MD.: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 79–107.
