This case study examines the impact of an unexpected recreational facility closure. The university studied is a small Division I school, located in a rural area. Semi-structured interviews were used to elicit data from 22 people representing various groups around campus. Using grounded theory, the researchers coded statements and categories, resulting in six themes: socialization, performance, adaptability, management, communication and perception, and student satisfaction. The study includes an overview of the university and recreational culture, a description of the fieldhouse roof collapse, interview methods and study limitations, an analysis of stakeholder interviews, and suggestions for how to best handle a similar scenario.
AllenderS., CowburnG., & FosterC. (2006). Understanding participation in sport and physical activity among children and adults: A review of qualitative studies. Health Education Research, 21, 826–835. PubMed ID: 16857780 doi:10.1093/her/cyl063
2.
AndrewD.P.S., PedersonP.M., & McEvoyC.D. (2011). Research methods and design in sport management. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
3.
ArtingerL., ClaphamL., HuntC., MeigsM., MilordN., SampsonB., & ForresterS. (2006). The social benefits of intramural sports. National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (NASPA) Journal, 43, 69–86.
4.
AstinA.W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297–308.
5.
BelchH.A., GebelM., & MaasG.M. (2001). Relationship between student recreation complex use, academic performance, and persistence of first-time freshmen. National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (NASPA) Journal, 38, 254–268.
6.
BrockM., Wallace CarrJ., & Kent ToddM. (2015). An examination of campus recreation usage, academic performance, and selected health indices of college freshmen. Recreational Sports Journal, 39, 27–36. doi:10.1123/rsj.2014-0061
7.
CharmazK. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In DenzinN.K. & LincolnY.S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 507–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
EisenhardtK.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
9.
EllisG.D., ComptonD.M., TysonB., & BohligM. (2002). Campus recreation participation health, and quality of life. Recreational Sports Journal, 26, 51–60. doi:10.1123/rsj.26.2.51
10.
ForresterS., & BeggsB. (2005). Gender and self-esteem in intramural sports. Physical and Health Education Journal, 70, 12–19.
11.
GibbertM., & RuigrokW. (2010). The “what” and “how” of case study rigor: Three strategies based on published work. Organizational Research Methods, 13(4), 710–737. doi:10.1177/1094428109351319
12.
GibbisonG.A., HenryT.L., & Perkins-BrownJ. (2011). The chicken soup effect: The role of recreation and intramural participation in boosting freshman grade point average. Economics of Education Review, 30, 247–257. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.09.003
13.
GrattonC., & JonesI. (2004). Research methods for sport studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
HenchyA. (2011). The influence of campus recreation beyond the gym. Recreational Sports Journal, 35, 174–181. doi:10.1123/rsj.35.2.174
15.
HenchyA. (2013). The perceived benefits of participating in campus recreation programs and facilities: A comparison between undergraduate and graduate students. Recreational Sports Journal, 37, 97–105. doi:10.1123/rsj.37.2.97
16.
KaiserH.H., & KleinE. (2000). Facilities management. In National Association of College and University Business Officers (Ed.), College & university business administration (6th ed., pp. 131–1390). Washington, DC: National Association of College and University Business Officers.
KantersM.A., & ForresterS. (1997a). Leisure motivation and self-concept: A comparison of campus recreation participants and non-participants. NIRSA Journal, 22, 29–33.
19.
KantersM.A., & ForresterS. (1997b). The motivations and self-esteem of intramural sports participants. NIRSA Journal, 21, 3–7.
20.
KennedyM. (2007). The good life. American School & University, 2, 34–36.
21.
LowerL., TurnerB.A., & PetersonJ.C. (2013). A comparative analysis of perceived benefits of participation between recreational sport programs. Recreational Sports Journal, 37(2), 66–83. doi:10.1123/rsj.37.1.66
22.
MillerJ.J. (2011). Impact of a university recreation center on social belonging and student retention. Recreational Sports Journal, 35, 117–129. doi:10.1123/rsj.35.2.117
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
ToddM., CzyszczonG., Wallace CarJ., & PrattC. (2009). Comparison of health and academic indices between campus recreation facility users and nonusers. Recreational Sports Journal, 33, 43–53. doi:10.1123/rsj.33.1.43
27.
WebbE., & ForresterS. (2015). Affective outcomes of intramural sport participation. Recreational Sports Journal, 39, 69–81.
