Parkour, an extreme recreational activity in which one overcomes obstacles in the most quick, efficient, and flowing way, encompasses running, jumping, vaulting, and climbing. The activity is gaining popularity on college campuses. The purposes of this study were to survey campus recreation administrators' views and policies on parkour and explore the potential legal liability higher education institutions face with the rise in participation in this potentially dangerous activity. The results showed little sanctioned parkour activity on college campuses and that recreation administrators do not appear to be worried. The legal analysis indicated that currently colleges and universities would not likely face legal liability for students who are injured while participating. However, prudent college recreational professionals must remain aware of new activities on campus and may want to take additional steps to insulate themselves from risks of legal liability.
BaneC. (2008, January 13). Jump first, ask questions later: Imported from France, a growing sport known as parkour is driving people up walls. Washington Post. Retrieved July 15, 2011 from: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-15094861.html
8.
BezansonR., & FinkelmanA. (2010). Trespassory art. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform. University of Michigan. Law School, 43, 245–322.
9.
Bradshaw v. Rawlings, 612 F.2d 135 (3d Cir., 1979)
10.
Breheny v. Catholic University of America, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14029 (D.D.C., 1989)
11.
CottenD.J. (2010). Negligence theory. In CottenD.J., & WolohanJ.T. (Eds.), Law for recreation and sport managers (5th ed., pp. 40–52). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
12.
DallJ.A. (2003). Determining duty in collegiate tort litigation: Shifting paradigms of the college-student relationship. The Journal of College and University Law, 29, 485.
13.
Davidson v. Univ. of N.C. at Chapel Hill, 543 S.E.2d 920 (N.C. Ct. App., 2001).
14.
DennerK. (2004). Taking one for the team: the role of assumption of the risk in sports torts cases. Seton Hall Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law, 14, 209–238.
FieldsS.K., & YoungS. (2010). Learning from the past: An analysis of case law impacting campus recreational sport programs. Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport, 20, 75–94.
18.
FuggleS. (2008). Discourses of subversion: The ethics and aesthetics of capoeira and parkour. Dance Research, 26(2), 204–222. doi:10.3366/E0264287508000194
19.
Furek v. University of Delaware, 594 A.2d 506 (Del. 1991).
20.
Gilbert v. Seton Hall University, 332 F.3d 105 (2d Cir. 2003).
21.
GussN. (2011). Parkour and the multitude: Politics of a dangerous art. French Cultural Studies, 22(1), 73–85. doi:10.1177/0957155810386675
22.
HefferanJ.J. (2002). Taking one for the team: Davidson v. University of North Carolina and the duty of care owed by universities to their student-athletes. Wake Forest Law Review, 37, 589–619.
23.
Henig v. Hofstra University, 553 N.Y.S.2d 479 (1990)
JohnsonM.V.M., & EasterB.A. (2007). Liability for cheerleading injuries: implications for universities and coaches. Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport, 17, 213–247.
26.
KatzM., & SeifriedC. (2012). A lawsuit in the waiting: special relationship within campus recreation. Recreational Sports Journal, 36, 45–59.
27.
Kleinecht v. Gettysburg College, 989 F.2d 1360, (3d Cir. 1993).
28.
Kyriazis v. Univ. of West Virginia, 450 S.E.2d 649 (W. Va., 1994)
29.
LakeP.L. (1999). The rise of duty and the fall of in loco parentis and other protective tort doctrines in higher education law. Missouri Law Review, 64, 1–28.
LawrenceH.J., KaburakisA., & MerckxC. (2008). NCAA Division I recruiting: identifying and mitigating institutional risk associated with the official visit. Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport, 18, 89–119.
MullR.F., BaylessK.G., & JamiesonL.M. (2005). Recreational sport management (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Nganga v. College of Wooster, 557 N.E.2d 152 (Ohio App., 1989)
36.
Ochoa v. State University, Sacramento, 72 Cal. App. 4th 1300 (1999)
37.
OrtuzarJ. (2009). Parkour or l'art du déplacement: A kinetic urban utopia. TDR: The Drama Review, 53(3), 54–66. doi:10.1162/dram.2009.53.3.54
38.
PetersK. (2007). Protecting the millennial college student. Southern California Review of Law and Social Justice, 16, 431–468.
Swanson v. Wabash, 504 N.E.2d 327 (Ind. Ct. App. 1987)
43.
van der SmissenB. (2007). Elements of negligence. In CottenD.J., & WolohanJ.T. (Eds.), Law for recreation and sport managers (4th ed., pp. 36–45). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
44.
WhiteN. (2005). Taking one for the team: should colleges be liable for injuries occurring during student participation in club sports?Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment Law & Practice, 7, 193–207.
