Few studies have examined muscular activation levels during commonly prescribed range of motion (ROM) exercises in a post-surgical superior labral tear anterior to posterior (SLAP) repair patient group. The present cross-sectional study compared shoulder musculature activation levels between postoperative SLAP repair patients with those of a healthy control cohort performing commonly prescribed postoperative shoulder exercises. The maximal ROM (MAX ROM) achieved during exercises was also studied.
Methods
Ten healthy volunteers and nine postoperative patients (post-SLAP) performed 10 rehabilitative exercises during the recording of electromyogram (EMG) activity from six shoulder muscles. Root mean squared amplitudes normalized to a submaximal reference voluntary contraction (RVC) were analyzed to compare exercises. A two-dimensional video of humeral-trunk angle captured the shoulder ROM for each exercise.
Results
One significant difference was found between groups; the anterior deltoid mean activity across all exercises was found to be higher in the post-SLAP group 53% RVC [95% confidence interval (CI) = 48% to 57% RVC] compared to the healthy group 46% RVC (95% CI = 42% to 50% RVC) (p = 0.02). Post-SLAP patients generated the least MAX ROM performing the Pendulum exercise 97°(95% CI = 88° to 107°) and the greatest during Forward Bow 131° (95% CI = 121° to 142°), (p = 0.002).
Conclusions
The present study identifies the shoulder muscle EMG and MAX ROM obtained during rehabilitation exercise in patients’ after SLAP repair. Knowledge of these parameters will help clinicians match the appropriate exercise to meet the desired objective for the particular rehabilitation goal.
NoyesFR.Functional properties of knee ligaments and alterations induced by immobilization: a correlative biomechanical and histological study in primates. Clin Orthop Relat Res1977; 123: 210–43.
5.
SchollmeierG, UhthoffHK, SarkarK, FukuharaK.Effects of immobilization on the capsule of the canine glenohumeral joint. A structural functional study. Clin Orthop Relat Res1994; 304: 37–42.
6.
WooSL, GomezMA, SitesTJ.The biomechanical and morphological changes in the medial collateral ligament of the rabbit after immobilization and remobilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am1987; 69: 1200–11.
7.
WilkKE, ReinoldMM, DugasJR.Current concepts in the recognition and treatment of superior labral (SLAP) lesions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2005; 35: 273–91.
8.
McCannPD, WoottenME, KadabaMP, BiglianiLU.A kinematic and electromyographic study of shoulder rehabilitation exercises. Clin Orthop Relat Res1993; 288: 179–88.
9.
BurdenA.How should we normalize electromyograms obtained from healthy participants? What we have learned from over 25 years of research. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2010; 20: 1023–35.
10.
WiseMB, UhlTL, MattacolaCG, NitzAJ, KiblerWB.The effect of limb support on muscle activation during shoulder exercises. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2004; 13: 614–20.
11.
HintermeisterRA, LangeGW, SchultheisJM, BeyMJ, HawkinsRJ.Electromyographic activity and applied load during shoulder rehabilitation exercises using elastic resistance. Am J Sports Med1998; 26: 210–20.
12.
MoseleyJB, JobeFW, PinkM, PerryJ, TiboneJ.EMG analysis of the scapular muscles during a shoulder rehabilitation program. Am J Sports Med1992; 20: 128–34.
13.
ReinoldMM, WilkKE, FleisigGS.Electromyographic analysis of the rotator cuff and deltoid musculature during common shoulder external rotation exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2004; 34: 385–94.
TownsendH, JobeFW, PinkM, PerryJ.Electromyographic analysis of the glenohumeral muscles during a baseball rehabilitation program. Am J Sports Med1991; 19: 264–72.
16.
DeckerMJ, HintermeisterRA, FaberKJ, HawkinsRJ.Serratus anterior muscle activity during selected rehabilitation exercises. Am J Sports Med1999; 27: 784–91.
17.
DeckerMJ, TokishJM, EllisHB, TorryMR, HawkinsRJ.Subscapularis muscle activity during selected rehabilitation exercises. Am J Sports Med2003; 31: 126–34.
18.
MyersJB, PasqualeMR, LaudnerKG.On-the-field resistance-tubing exercises for throwers: an electromyographic analysis. J Athl Train2005; 40: 15–22.
19.
DockeryML, WrightTW, LaStayoPC.Electromyography of the shoulder: an analysis of passive modes of exercise. Orthopaedics1998; 21: 1181–4.
20.
LongJL, Ruberte ThieleRA, SkendzelJG.Activation of the shoulder musculature during pendulum exercises and light activities. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2010; 40: 230–7.
21.
UhlTL, MuirTA, LawsonL.Electromyographical assessment of passive, active assistive, and active shoulder rehabilitation exercises. Phys Med Rehab2010; 2: 132–41.
22.
ReddyAS, MohrKJ, PinkMM, JobeFW.Electromyographic analysis of the deltoid and rotator cuff muscles in persons with subacromial impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2000; 9: 519–23.
23.
CoolsA, WitvrouwE, DeclerqG, DaneelsL, CambierD.Scapular muscle recruitment patterns: trapezius muscle latency with and without impingement symptoms. Am J Sports Med2003; 31: 542–9.
24.
CoolsAM, WitvrouwE, DeclercqGA, VanderstraetenGG, CambierDC.Evaluation of isokinetic force production and associated muscle activity in the scapular rotators during a protraction-retraction movement in overhead athletes with impingement symptoms. Br J Sports Med2004; 38: 64–8.
25.
GlousmanR, JobeFW, TiboneJE.Dynamic electromyographic analysis of the throwing shoulder with glenohumeral instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am1988; 70A: 220–6.
26.
SnyderSJ, KarzelRP, Del PizzoW, FerkelRD, FriedmanMJ.SLAP lesions of the shoulder. Arthroscopy1990; 6: 274–9.
27.
PaytonCJ. In: PaytonCJ, BartlettRM, eds. Biomechanical evaluation of movement in sport and exercise: the British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences guidelines.Padstow: Routledge, 2008.
28.
BasmajianJV, De LucaCJ, ButlerJP.Apparatus, detection, and recording techniques. Muscle alive, their functions revealed by electromyography.Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1985: 19–64.
29.
ZippP.Recommendations for the standardization of lead positions in surface electromyography. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol1982; 50: 41–54.
DelagiEF, IazzettiJ, PerottoA, MorrisonD. In PerottaAO ed. Anatomical guide for the electromyographer, the limbs and trunk.3rd ed.Charles C Thomas, Springfield, 1994.
32.
EkstromRA, DonatelliRA, SoderbergGL.Surface electromyographic analysis of exercises for the trapezius and serratus anterior muscles. J Orthop Sports Phy Ther2003; 33: 247–58.
33.
KellyBT, KadrmasWR, KirkendallDT, SpeerKP.Optimal normalization tests for shoulder muscle activation: an electromyographic study. J Orthop Res1996; 14: 647–53.
34.
KellyBT, CooperLW, KirkendallDT, SpeerKP.Technical considerations for electromyographic research on the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res1997; 335: 140–51.
35.
PoppenNK, WalkerPS.Normal and abnormal motion of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am1976; 58A: 195–201.
36.
YangJF, WinterDA.Electromyography reliability in maximal and submaximal isometric contractions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1983; 64: 417–20.
37.
WilkKE, ArrigoCA.Current concepts in the rehabilitation of the athletic shoulder. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther1993; 18: 365–77.
38.
EllenbeckerTS.Guest editorial. Postsurgical rehabilitation protocols when the ‘evidence’ is limited. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2002; 32: 246–7.
39.
KiblerWB, McMullenJ, UhlT.Shoulder rehabilitation strategies, guidelines, and practice. Orthop Clin North Am2001; 32: 527–38.
40.
BirdSB, DicksonEW.Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med2001; 38: 639–43.
HeckathorneCW, ChildressDS.Relationships of the surface electromyogram to the force, length, velocity, and contraction rate of the cineplastic human biceps. Am J Phys Med1981; 60: 1–19.
43.
SoderbergGL.Selected topics in surface electromyography for use in the occupational setting:expert perspectives.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1992.
44.
MeltonC, MullineauxD, MattacolaC, MairS, UhlT.Reliability of video motion-analysis systems to measure amplitude and velocity of shoulder elevation. J Sport Rehabil2011; 20: 393–405.
45.
KronbergM, GunnarN, BrostromL.Muscle activity and coordination in the normal shoulder, an electromyographic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res1990; 257: 76–85.
46.
YanagawaT, GoodwinCJ, ShelburneKB.Contributions of the individual muscles of the shoulder to glenohumeral joint stability during abduction. J Biomech Eng2008; 130: 021024.
ChesterR, SmithTO, HooperL, DixonJ.The impact of subacromial impingement syndrome on muscle activity patterns of the shoulder complex: a systematic review of electromyographic studies. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2010; 11: 45.
49.
LudewigPM, CookTM.Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement. Phys Ther2000; 80: 276–91.
50.
CoolsAM, DeclercqGA, CambierDC, MahieuNN, WitvrouwEE.Trapezius activity and intramuscular balance during isokinetic exercise in overhead athletes with impingement symptoms. Scand J Med Sci Sports2007; 17: 25–33.
51.
AlpertSW, PinkMM, JobeFW, McMahonPJ, MathiyakomW.Electromyographic analysis of deltoid and rotator cuff function under varying loads and speeds. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2000; 9: 47–57.
52.
BlackburnTA, GuidoJA.Rehabilitation after ligamentous and labral surgery of the shoulder: guiding concepts. J Athl Train2000; 35: 373–81.
53.
BasmajianJV, De LucaCJ, ButlerJP.Description and analysis of the EMG signal. Muscle alive, their functions revealed by electromyography.Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1985: 65–100.
54.
DeLucaCJ, MerlettiR.Surface myoelectric signal cross-talk among muscles of the leg. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1988; 69: 568–75.
55.
VinkP, DaanenH, VerboutA.Specificity of surface-EMG on the intrinsic lumbar back. Hum Mov Sci1989; 8: 67–78.
56.
DodsonCC, AltchekDW.SLAP lesions: an update on recognition and treatment. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2009; 39: 71–80.
