A simple phrase takes its meaning from a given context, and already makes its appeal to another one in which it will be understood; but, of course, to be understood it has to transform the context in which it is inscribed. As a result, this appeal, this promise of the future, will necessarily open up the production of a new context, wherever it may happen. The future is not present, but there is an opening onto it; and because there is a future, a context is always open. What we call opening of the context is another name for what is still to come. (Derrida and Ferraris, 2001: 19–20)
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtkinsonP., (1990), The Ethnographic Imagination: Textual Constructions of Reality, London: Routledge.
2.
BackL., (2007), The Art of Listening, Oxford: Berg.
3.
BaradK., (2007), Meeting the Universe Halfway, Durham and London: Duke University Press.
4.
BrahA. and PhoenixA., (2004), ‘Revisiting Intersectionality’, Journal Of International Women's Studies, 5 (3): 75–86.
5.
BellV., (2007), Culture and Performance: The Challenge of Ethics, Politics and Feminist Theory, Oxford: Berg.
6.
BeynonH., (1975), Working for Ford, London: EP Publishing.
7.
BlackmanL., (2008), ‘Affect, Relationality and the Problem of Personality’, Theory, Culture and Society, 25 (1): 27–51.
8.
BourdieuP., (1991), The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.
9.
ButlerJ., (1990), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, London: Routledge.
10.
DeleuzeJ., (1994), Difference and Repetition, New York: Columbia University Press.
11.
DelphyC., (1984), Close to Home: a Materialist Analysis of Women's Oppression, London: Hutchinson.
12.
DerridaJ., (1982), Margins of Philosophy, translated by BassA., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
DerridaJ. and FathyS., (1999), Derrida Elswehere, Gloria Films.
14.
DerridaJ. and FerrarisM., (2001) A Taste for the Secret, translated by DonisG., Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
DiproseR., (2002), Corporeal Generosity: On Giving with Nietzsche, Merleau-Ponty and Levinas, Albany: State University of New York Press.
16.
DouglasM., (2003 [1966]), Purity and Danger. An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo, London: Routledge.
17.
EvansM., (2004), Killing Thinking: the Death of the Universities, London: Continuum.
18.
FoucaultM., (2003 [1973]), The Birth of the Clinic. An Archeology of Medical Perception, translated by SmithA. Sheridan, London: Routledge.
19.
FoucaultM., (1993), ‘Dream, Imagination and Existence’, translated by WilliamsF., in HoellerKeith (ed.), Dream and Existence, HPI: New Jersey.
20.
FoucaultM., (1996[1980]),‘The Masked Philosopher’, in SylvèreL. (ed.), Foucault Live (Interviews, 1961–1984), translated by HochrothL. and JohnstonJ., 2nd edition, New York: Semiotext(e).
21.
FoucaultM., (1998), ‘Afterword to the Temptation of Saint Anthony’, in FaubionJ. (ed.), Michel Foucault: Aesthetics, The Essential WorksVol. 2. London: Allen Lane, 103–122
22.
FoucaultM., (2000), My body, this paper, this fire, in Michel Foucault: Aesthetics. The Essential Works, Vol. 2. London: Penguin Books: 393–418.
23.
FrankT., (2001), One Market Under God: Extreme Capitalism, Market Populism, and the End of Economic Development, New York: Doubleday.
24.
GatensM., (1996), Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality, London and New York: Routledge.
GrindonG., (2007),‘The Breath of the Possible’, in ShukaitisS.GraeberD. and BiddleE. (eds), Constituent Imagination: Militant Investigations // Collective Theorization. Oakland, CA: AK Press, 94–107.
27.
GuattariF., (1996), Soft Subversions, New York: Semiotext(e).
28.
HarawayD., (2007), When Species Meet, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
29.
HeideggerM., (1962), Being and Time, translated by MacquarrieJ. and RobinsonE., Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
30.
HeideggerM., (1996), The Question Concerning Technology, in KrellD.F. (ed.), Martin Heidegger. Basic Writings, revised and expanded edition, London: Routledge.
31.
KenwayJ. and FaheyJ. (eds), (2008), Imagining Research Otherwise. Globalising the Research Imagination, London and New York: Routledge.
32.
KuhnT., (1981), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
LatimerJ., (2009), Unsettling Bodies: Frida Kahlo's Self-Portraits and Dividuality, in LatimerJ. and SchillmeierM. (eds), Un/knowing Bodies. The Sociological Review Monograph Series, Oxford: Blackwell, 46–62.
34.
LatimerJ. and MunroR., (2009), ‘Keeping and Dwelling: Relational Extension, the Idea of Home and Otherness’, Space and Culture, 12 (3): 317–331.
35.
LatimerJ. and de la BellacasaM. Puig, (in press), ‘The motility of the ethical in bioscience: The case of care in anti-ageing science’,Law Ethics and Society, V.
36.
LohmannP. and SteyaertC., (2006), ‘In the mean time: Vitalism, Affects, and Metamorphosis in Organizational Change’, in FuglsangM. and SorensonB.M. (eds), Deleuze and the Social, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
37.
MunroR., (2005), Partial Organisation: Marilyn Strathern and the Elicitation of Relations, in JonesC. and MunroR. (eds), Contemporary Organisation Theory. The Sociological Review Monograph Series, Oxford: Blackwell, 245–267.
38.
MunroR., (2010), ‘Not for Turning? Power, Institutional Ethos and the Ethics of Irreversibility’, Business Ethics: A European Review, 19 (3): 292–307.
39.
MunroR., (2011), Unfolding Social Construction, in BensonM. and MunroR. (eds), Sociological Routes and Political Roots, The Sociological Review Monograph Series.
40.
de la BellacasaM. Puig, (in press), ‘Thinking with Care’, The Sociological Review.
SkeggsB., (2008), ‘The Dirty History of Feminism and Sociology: Or the War of Conceptual Attrition’, The Sociological Review, 56 (4): 670–689.
43.
StrathernM., (1991), Partial Connections, Savage, Maryland: Rowman and Little.
44.
StrathernM., (1994), Parts and Wholes: Refiguring Relationships, in BorofskyR. (ed.), Assessing Cultural Anthropology. New York: McGraw Hill, 204–217.
45.
StrathernM., (1995), The Relation: Issues in Complexity and Scale, Cambridge, UK: Prickly Pear Press.
46.
StrathernM., (1997), ‘“Improving Ratings”: Audit in the British Univesity System’, European Review, 5 (3): 305–321.
47.
StrathernM., (1999), Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things [collected essays], London: Athlone Press.
48.
ThoburnN., (2007), ‘Patterns of Production: Cultural Studies after Hegemony’, Theory, Culture and Society, 24 (79): 79–94.
49.
ThompsonE.P., (1971), Warwick University PLC, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
50.
VerranH., (1998), ‘Re-imagining Land Title in Australia’, Postcolonial Studies, 1 (2): 237–254.
51.
VeyneP., (1988), Did the Greeks Believe in Their Myths? An Essay on the Constitutive Imagination, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
52.
VirnoP., (1996), The Ambivalence of Disenchantment, in VirnoP. and HardtM. (eds), Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics, London: University of Minnesota Press.
53.
WalkerdineV., (2003), ‘Reclassifying Upward Mobility: Femininity and the Neo-Liberal Subject’, Gender and Education, 15 (3): 237–248.
54.
WeberS., (1996), Mass Mediaurus: Form, Technics, Media, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
55.
WeissG., (1999), Body Images: Embodiment as Intercorporeality, London and New York: Routledge.
56.
WillisP., (2000), The Ethnographic Imagination, Cambridge: Polity Press.
57.
Wright-MillsC., (1959), The Sociological Imagination, New York: Oxford University Press.
