AlwayJ. (2000) “No Body There: Habermas and Feminism,”Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 19, 117–41.
2.
ArantesO. B. F. and ArantasP. E. (2001) “The Neo-Enlightenment Aesthetics of Jürgen Habermas,”Cultural Critique49, 43–57.
3.
AsenR. (2000) “Seeking the “Counter” in Counterpublics,”Communication Theory10, 4, Nov., 424–446.
4.
AsenR. and BrouwerD. C. (2001) “Introduction: Reconfigurations of the Public Sphere,” in AsenR. and BrouwerD. C. (eds), Counterpublics and the State. Albany, State University of New York Press, 1–32.
5.
BakhtinM. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by BakhtinM. M.HolquistM. (ed.). Austin: Texas University Press.
6.
BakhtinM. (1990) Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Essays by M. M. Bakhtin, HolquistM. and LiapunovV. (eds). Austin: Texas University Press.
7.
BakhtinM. (1984a) Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics, EmersonC. (ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
8.
BakhtinM. (1984b) Rabelais and His World. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press.
9.
BakhtinM. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, EmersonC. and HolquistM. (eds), Austin: Texas University Press.
10.
BakhtinM. (1993) Toward a Philosophy of the Act. Austin: Texas University Press.
11.
BenhabibS. (1992) Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. London and New York: Routledge.
12.
BenhabibS. (1995) “The Debate Over Women and Moral Theory Revisited,” in MeehanJ. (ed.), Feminists Read Habermas. London and New York: Routledge, 181–204.
13.
de CerteauM. (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
14.
CrookS. (1998) “Minotaurs and Other Monsters: “Everyday Life” in Recent Social Theory,”Sociology32, 3, 523–40.
15.
CrossleyN. (1996) “Corporeality and Communicative Action: Embodying the Renewal of Critical Theory,”Body and Society3, 1, 17–46.
16.
FeatherstoneM. (1992) “The Heroic Life and Everyday Life,”Theory, Culture and Society9, 159–82.
17.
FoucaultM. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Writings 1972–77, GordonC. (ed.). New York: Pantheon Books.
FraserN. (1992) “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy,” in CalhounC. (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press, 109–42.
20.
GardinerM. (1992) The Dialogics of Critique: M. M. Bakhtin and the Theory of Ideology. London: Routledge.
21.
GardinerM. (1993) “Bakhtin's Carnival: Utopia as Critique,” in ShepherdD. (ed.), Bakhtin: Carnival and Other Subjects. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 20–47.
22.
GardinerM. (1996) “Foucault, Ethics and Dialogue,”History of the Human Sciences9, 3, 27–46.
23.
GardinerM. (2000) Critiques of Everyday Life. London and New York: Routledge.
24.
GardinerM. (2002) “Bakhtin and Prosaics: A Critical Interrogation,” in ZylkoB. (ed.), Bakhtin and His Intellectual Ambience. Gdansk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdanskiego, 2002: 109–19.
25.
GardinerM. (2003) “Introduction,”Mikhail Bakhtin: Masters of Modern Thought, Four Volumes. London and Thousand Oaks: Sage Ltd, ix–xxx.
26.
GarveyT. G. (2000) “The Value of Opacity: A Bakhtinian Analysis of Habermas's Discourse Ethics,”Philosophy and Rhetoric33, 4: 370–90.
27.
GiddensA. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, Stanford University Press.
28.
GouldnerA. (1975) “Sociology and the Everyday Life,” in CoserL. A. (ed.), The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 417–32.
29.
HabermasJ. (1978) Knowledge and Human Interests. 2nd edition, trans. ShapiroJ., London: Heinemann.
30.
HabermasJ. (1979) Communication and the Evolution of Society. London: Heinemann.
31.
HabermasJ. (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol. II. Boston: Beacon Press.
32.
HabermasJ. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press.
33.
HabermasJ. (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press.
34.
HabermasJ. (1992a) “Further Reflections on the Public Sphere,” in CalhounC. (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press, 421–61.
35.
HabermasJ. (1992b) Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews with Jürgen Habermas, rev. edn.DewsP. (ed.). London: Verso.
36.
HellerA. (1982) “Habermas and Marxism,” in ThompsonJ. and HeldD. (eds), Habermas: Critical Debates. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press, 21–41.
37.
HillM., and MontagW. (2000) “Introduction: What Was, What Is, the Public Sphere? Post-Cold War Reflections,” in HillM. and MontagW. (eds), Masses, Classes and the Public Sphere. London and New York: Verso, 1–10.
38.
HirschkopK. (1999) Mikhail Bakhtin: An Aesthetic for Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
HirschkopK. (2000) “It's Too Good To Talk: Myths of Dialogue in Bakhtin and Habermas,”New Formations41, 83–93.
40.
JungH. J. (1990) “Mikhail Bakhtin's Body Politic: A Phenomenological Dialogics,”Man and World23, 85–99.
41.
KosíkK. (1976) Dialectics of the Concrete: A Study on Problems of Man and World. Boston and Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
42.
LyotardJ.-F. (1984) The Post-Modern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
43.
McCarthyT. (1981) The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge (Mass.) and London: The MIT Press.
44.
MaffesoliM. (1989) “The Sociology of Everyday Life (Epistemological Elements),”Current Sociology37, 1, 1–16.
45.
MelucciA. (1988) “Social Movements and the Democratization of Everyday Life,” in KeaneJ. (ed.), Civil Society and the State: New European Perspectives. London: Verso, 245–60.
46.
MontagW. (2000) “The Pressure of the Street: Habermas' Fear of the Masses,”HillM. and MontagW. (eds), Masses, Classes and the Public Sphere. London and New York: Verso, 132–45.
47.
MorsonG. S. and EmersonC. (1990) Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
48.
NielsenG. (1995) “Bakhtin and Habermas: Towards a Transcultural Ethics,”Theory and Society24, 6, 803–35.
49.
NielsenG. (2002) The Norms of Answerability: Social Theory Between Bakhtin and Habermas. Albany: State University of New York Press.
50.
OuthwaiteW. (1994) Habermas: A Critical Introduction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
51.
RobbinsB. (1993) “Introduction: The Public as Phantom,” in RobbinsB. (ed.), The Phantom Public Sphere. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, vii–xxvi.
52.
StolzeT. (2000) “A Misplaced Transition: Habermas on the Public Sphere,” in HillM. and MontagW. (eds), Masses, Classes and the Public Sphere, London and New York: Verso, 146–57.
53.
ThorntonW. H. (1994) “Cultural Prosaics as Counterdiscourse: A Direction for Cultural Studies After Bakhtin,”Prose Studies17, 2, 74–93.
54.
WarnerM. (2002) Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.
55.
YoungM. I. (1987) “Impartiality and the Civic Public: Some Implications of Feminist Critiques of Moral and Political Theory,” in BenhabibS. and CornellD. (eds), Feminism as Critique: On the Politics of Gender In Late Capitalist Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press, 57–76.